Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Home-Based Supportive Care Program for NMIBC Patients Receiving Intravesical Perfusion: Construction and Preliminary Application (NMIBC-HSC)

20 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Construction and Preliminary Application of Home-Based Supportive Care Program for Patients With Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Intravesical Perfusion Therapy

This study focuses on patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who receive intravesical perfusion therapy. Outpatient perfusion treatment is usually short-term and procedure-oriented, so patients often lack continuous, comprehensive support after returning home, and may face physical discomfort, psychological stress and unmet self-management needs during home recovery. This study aims to identify real-world difficulties and needs of patients in home-based recovery, construct a personalized home supportive care program covering physical symptom relief, psychological support and disease management education, and test its preliminary application effect. It is expected to reduce patients' treatment-related discomfort, improve treatment adherence, and enhance their quality of life.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

(1)Identification of Supportive Care Needs for Patients Receiving Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (Qualitative Study): Employing a descriptive qualitative research approach based on the Supportive Care Needs Framework, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with patients undergoing postoperative intravesical chemotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This systematically explored the authentic care needs of patients across multiple dimensions including physiological, psychological, social, emotional, spiritual, informational, and practical aspects, providing precise evidence for subsequent scheme development.

(2) Summary of Best Evidence for Supportive Care of NMIBC Patients Undergoing Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy (Evidence-Based Research): Centered on the core needs identified through qualitative research, an evidence-based nursing research methodology was utilized. Systematic retrieval of domestic and international databases, guideline websites, and evidence-based resource libraries was performed. The retrieved clinical guidelines, expert consensus statements, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and quasi-experimental studies underwent rigorous quality assessment and evidence extraction to formulate a comprehensive summary of best supportive care evidence for this population.

(3) Development of a Supportive Care Scheme for NMIBC Patients Undergoing Postoperative Intravesical Chemotherapy (Delphi Method): Integrating patient needs derived from qualitative research with best evidence from evidence-based research, a draft supportive care scheme was formulated. The Delphi expert consultation method was employed, inviting experts from urology medicine, nursing, and rehabilitation fields to participate in two rounds of consultations. Through calculation of expert positive coefficient, authority coefficient, and Kendall's harmony coefficient, items were screened and revised, ultimately constructing a scientific, systematic, and operable supportive care scheme.

(4) Evaluation of the Feasibility of the Supportive Care Scheme: Following scheme formulation, feasibility evaluation was conducted using NMIBC patients receiving postoperative intravesical chemotherapy attending the outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Nanjing. Participants were divided into an intervention group (receiving the newly developed supportive care scheme) and a control group (receiving routine outpatient care). During the study, patient recruitment and retention rates, intervention implementation processes, and compliance were observed and recorded. Post-intervention, acceptability of the scheme and perceived implementation burden by both patients and staff were collected to evaluate its feasibility in clinical practice.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

40

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Chunhua Zheng, Bachelor
  • Número de teléfono: +8613584042177
  • Correo electrónico: 303618002@qq.com

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, Porcelana, 210001
        • Nanjing First Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients pathologically diagnosed with NMIBC, who have undergone TURBT and are receiving intravesical perfusion therapy; Aged 18 years old or above; Clear consciousness with basic literacy and communication skills; Expected survival time ≥ 6 months; Voluntary participation with signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients complicated with severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, hepatic or renal dysfunction, or mental disorders; Patients combined with other malignant tumors; Patients with a history of severe allergic reactions or contraindications to intravesical perfusion therapy.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Supportive care program
Establishing a Dedicated Nursing Team: The team consists of one urology specialty nurse (team leader), one attending physician, one rehabilitation therapist, one dietitian, one psychological counselor, and the researchers of this study. All members received uniform protocol training prior to intervention to ensure homogeneity in intervention delivery. This comprehensive supportive care program is implemented for patients undergoing post-operative intravesical therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, encompassing physiological/practical support, informational support, psychological/emotional support, and social/spiritual support, with the aim of enhancing treatment adherence and quality of life.
Establishing a Dedicated Nursing Team: The team consists of one urology specialty nurse (team leader), one attending physician, one rehabilitation therapist, one dietitian, one psychological counselor, and the researchers of this study. All members received uniform protocol training prior to intervention to ensure homogeneity in intervention delivery. This comprehensive supportive care program is implemented for patients undergoing post-operative intravesical therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, encompassing physiological/practical support, informational support, psychological/emotional support, and social/spiritual support, with the aim of enhancing treatment adherence and quality of life.
Comparador activo: Implementing routine urology outpatient infusion nursing
Includes: routine medical history inquiry and verification prior to infusion; monitoring of the patient's vital signs and clinical condition changes during infusion; routine verbal instructions on post-infusion precautions (such as increased water intake and frequent urination) after infusion; distribution of standard outpatient paper educational materials; and simple telephone follow-up in accordance with departmental routine procedures.
Includes: Routine medical history inquiry and verification before infusion; Monitoring of the patient's vital signs and changes in condition during infusion; Routine verbal instructions on precautions after infusion (such as drinking plenty of water and urinating frequently); Distribution of routine outpatient paper educational leaflets; Conducting simple telephone follow-ups in accordance with the department's routine procedures.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Clinical Treatment Adherence
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months after intervention
Treatment adherence will be evaluated by infusion completion rate,calculated as (actual number of infusions received / total planned infusions prescribed) × 100%.
6 months after intervention

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Bladder-cancer-specific quality of life
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline、3 months、6 months after intervention
This outcome will evaluate bladder-cancer-specific quality of life using the validated Chinese version of the EORTC-QLQ-NMIBC24 scale. Higher scores correspond to greater symptom burden and worse quality-of-life status.
Baseline、3 months、6 months after intervention
Recruitment rate and infoermed consent rate
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
Calculate the proportion of eligible patients who sign informed consent and formally enroll into the study among all screened eligible subjects.
Baseline
Patient Satisfaction and Acceptance
Periodo de tiempo: 3months after intervention
A self-designed questionnaire with 5 items using 5-point Likert scale is adopted to score patients'satisfaction and acceptance of the supportive care program
3months after intervention
Satisfaction of supportive care needs
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3 months after intervention, 6 months after intervention
The Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34) is administered at three time points to evaluate changes in patients' supportive care needs between two groups.
Baseline, 3 months after intervention, 6 months after intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de septiembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

20 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de agosto de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

24 de agosto de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

24 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir