- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07811336
Optimized AFO Care For Children With Cerebral Palsy. (OPTI-CARE)
Effectiveness And Costeffectiveness Of Optimized Ankle Foot Orthosis Care For Children With Cerebral Palsy.
Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are widely prescribed in children with cerebral palsy (CP) to improve their gait, enhance mobility and prevent secondary complications during growth. However, in the Netherlands there is considerable variation in how AFO treatment is provided, and AFOs are not always optimally effective.
In adults with neuromuscular disorders, it has been proven that optimized orthotic care delivered according to a standardized protocol reduces practice variation and is more effective in achieving individual treatment goals and improving patient satisfaction than usual orthotic care. For children with CP, it is expected that orthotic care based on a similarly standardized and optimized approach, will support better decision-making regarding the most appropriate orthosis and improve the overall AFO care process. In addition, such an approach may reduce healthcare costs compared to current AFO care, for example by reducing the need for consultations with other healthcare professionals.
The aim of this study is to develop a new approach to AFO treatment in children with CP. This will be done by developing a standardized protocol that provides guidelines and instructions for healthcare professionals on key aspects of AFO selection, user training and evaluation. First, the effects of current AFO care will be evaluated in a group of 43 children with CP. After development of the new optimized protocol, the effects of optimized AFO care will be evaluated in a second group of 43 children with CP. The investigators will compare the attaining of personal treatment goals at 3 months follow-up between optimized AFO care and usal AFO care, and assess the cost-effectiveness of both interventions.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Dr. Merel-Anne Brehm, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: 020 566 9111
- E-mail: m.a.brehm@amsterdamumc.nl
Lieux d'étude
-
-
North Holland
-
Amsterdam, North Holland, Pays-Bas, 1105 AZ
- Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
-
Contact:
- Dr. Merel-Anne Brehm, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: 020 566 3345
- E-mail: m.a.brehm@amsterdamumc.nl
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
- Adulte
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of cerebral palsy
- Age range from independent walking onset up to 18 years
- Ability to walk independently with or without a walking aid (e.g., a walker)
- Indication for a first or repeated prescription of AFO for daytime use to improve gait function
Exclusion Criteria:
- Orthopaedic or neurosurgical surgery within the past 6 months (e.g., SDR)
- Child and parent do not speak Dutch
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Non randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation séquentielle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Aucune intervention: Usual AFO care
Usual AFO care, is the current AFO care given in the different participating rehabilitation centres according to their own approach.
|
|
|
Expérimental: Optimized AFO care
Optimized AFO care, this group receives optimized AFO care following the new standardized protocol that will be developed during this study.
|
Standardized protocol for decision making in AFO care
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline to 3 months follow-up in attainment of individual treatment goals
Délai: Individual treatment goals will be established at baseline, and at 3 months and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
The individual treatment goals will be set and evaluated using goal attainment scaling (GAS).
Goals will be defined at the activity and/or participation level and are rated on a scale ranging from -3 to +2. (where the current situation is defined as -2 and the desired attainment goal as 0).
Attainment of the goals at 3 and 6 months follow-up will be scored as -3 for worsened, -2 for unchanged, -1 for somewhat less than expected, 0 for expected outcome, +1 for somewhat more than expected, and +2 for much more than expected.
|
Individual treatment goals will be established at baseline, and at 3 months and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline to 3 months follow-up in gait function
Délai: At baseline, and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
Gait function will be evaluated with a 10-meter walking test and simultaneous video assessment.
Besides walking speed, the following outcomes will be assessed: foot contact at initial contact, knee angle during midstance, foot contact during midstance, minimal knee angle during late stance, clearance at early swing, and clearance at late swing
|
At baseline, and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
|
Orthosis satisfaction at 3 months follow-up, assessed with the Dutch version of the client satisfaction with device (D-CSD) module of the OPUS questionnaire
Délai: At baseline (only for participants who already wear an AFO), and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
The D-CSD contains 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0; 'strongly disagree' to 4; 'strongly agree', with a total score ranging from 0-40.
|
At baseline (only for participants who already wear an AFO), and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
|
Experiences of participants with the provided AFO treatment at 3 months follow-up
Délai: 3 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
Experiences of participants with the AFO treatment will be explored with a semi-structured interview.
|
3 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
|
Orthosis satisfaction at 3 months follow-up, assessed with the Dutch version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (D-Quest) questionnaire
Délai: At baseline (only for participants who already wear an AFO), and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
The D-Quest assesses the satisfaction with aspects related to the orthotic device and the provided services.
The questionnaire consists of 9 questions about characteristics of the orthotic device, all scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'not satisfied at all' to 'very satisfied'.
Total scores for the device component range from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
|
At baseline (only for participants who already wear an AFO), and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
|
Change from baseline to 3 months follow-up in quality of life on the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L)
Délai: At baseline, and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
The EQ-5D-5L contains five questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety and depression scored on a 5-point scale indicating the degree of problems with each dimension and one question about experienced health scored on a 0-100 visual analogue scale.
|
At baseline, and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
|
Change from baseline to 3 months follow-up in perceived pain and stability, assessed with a questionnaire
Délai: At baseline, and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
A 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) where for pain 0 is 'no pain at all' and 10 is 'unbearable pain', and for stability 0 is 'not stable at all' and 10 is 'extremely stable'.
|
At baseline, and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
|
AFO usage at 3 months follow-up, assessed with a questionnaire
Délai: At baseline (only for participants who already wear an AFO), and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
A questionnaire containing items about how often the child wears the AFO inside and outside the house and for how many hours per day and how many days per week.
|
At baseline (only for participants who already wear an AFO), and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
|
Adverse events with the AFO
Délai: Up to 6 months follow-up
|
The following adverse events reported by the participant or observed by the investigator or orthotist will be recorded; pressure sores, abrasions, pain due to the AFO, and material damage of the AFO
|
Up to 6 months follow-up
|
|
Health care costs and societal costs assessed with a cost-questionnaire
Délai: Directly post-intervention when the AFO is delivered, and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
The parents and children fill out a cost questionnaire to record health care costs related to AFO care, as well as societal costs.
|
Directly post-intervention when the AFO is delivered, and 3 and 6 months after the AFO has been delivered.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Les enquêteurs
- Directeur d'études: Prof. dr. Annemieke Buizer, MD PhD, Amsterdam UMC, location Vumc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081 HV
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Wingstrand M, Hagglund G, Rodby-Bousquet E. Ankle-foot orthoses in children with cerebral palsy: a cross sectional population based study of 2200 children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Oct 2;15:327. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-327.
- VAN Duijnhoven E, Koopman FS, Tuijtelaars J, Altmann V, VAN Dongen JM, Janse M, Nollet F, Brehm MA. Specialized orthotic care to improve functioning in adults with neuromuscular disorders: results of an open-label blinded end-point randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Jun;61(3):496-508. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08770-2.
- Brehm MA, Harlaar J, Schwartz M. Effect of ankle-foot orthoses on walking efficiency and gait in children with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Jul;40(7):529-34. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0209.
- Morris C, Newdick H, Johnson A. Variations in the orthotic management of cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2002 Mar;28(2):139-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00259.x.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2026.0135
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .