Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Indonesian Version of Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus Test in Stroke Patient (OCS-Plus)

9 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Universitas Padjadjaran

Validity and Reliability Test of the Indonesian Version of Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus in Stroke Patient

The incidence of stroke increases every year throughout the world. Neuropsychological assessment is the best way to identify post-stroke cognitive dysfunction. The importance of cognitive function in the post stroke rehabilitation program process requires a tool that can detect cognitive disorders more specifically and more sensitively. The investigator aim in this study was to develop Indonesian version of the OCS - Plus among stroke patient in Indonesia.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Stroke causes not only motor deficits, but also cognitive dysfunction, which is frequently observed among stroke survivors. Most patients in the acute phase demonstrate impairment in at least one cognitive domain. The global burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is substantial and may affect more than half of all stroke survivors. Cognitive impairment is also reported in approximately one-third to nearly one-half of patients within the first year after stroke. The clinical presentation of PSCI reflects the involvement of multiple brain networks as well as interaction with pre-existing neurodegenerative processes. PSCI has important clinical consequences, including reduced independence, limitations in activities of daily living, and poorer quality of life. This burden makes PSCI a major concern in the management and rehabilitation of stroke survivors.

Early evaluation of cognitive function is an essential component of clinical assessment after stroke. Clinical practice guidelines emphasize cognitive screening as a foundation for rehabilitation planning and patient follow-up.

Commonly used tools such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) primarily focus on global cognitive deficits and demonstrate limited sensitivity in identifying domain-specific impairments, particularly in the subacute and chronic phases of stroke. Several domains that are commonly affected after stroke, including language, visuospatial processing, and praxis, are not adequately assessed by these instruments. Interpretation of test performance may also be biased by aphasia or neglect, both of which can influence the patient's responses.

Therefore, the OCS-Plus was designed to detect more subtle cognitive deficits, especially in executive function and memory, which are often overlooked by standard screening tools.

The Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus (OCS-Plus) was developed as a digital cognitive screening tool designed to improve the sensitivity of cognitive impairment detection. Its assessment approach allows a more detailed evaluation of memory and executive function than conventional screening instruments. The OCS-Plus consists of multiple subtasks intended to identify differences across cognitive domains with greater specificity. Tablet-based administration offers advantages in the form of standardized procedures and reduced scoring error.

The digital format also enables more detailed response capture and automated reporting of results. Previous studies have shown that the OCS-Plus has good validity and greater sensitivity for detecting subtle cognitive impairment than other screening tools.

The development of the OCS-Plus has largely been conducted in Western populations, where linguistic and cultural contexts differ from those in Southeast Asia. These differences may influence test comprehension and performance, potentially affecting the validity of cognitive assessment. Despite the high burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment in this region, there is a lack of culturally adapted and validated domain-specific cognitive screening tools, limiting accurate diagnosis and optimal rehabilitation planning. This gap underscores the need to validate advanced screening tools such as the OCS-Plus in non-Western populations. This study is the first to culturally adapt and validate the OCS-Plus for use in an Indonesian population, addressing the lack of domain-specific cognitive screening tools in Southeast Asia. Therefore, this study aims to validate normative values for the the OCS-Plus in an Indonesian stroke population.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

75

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Muhammad Luthfi Dharmawan, Subspecialist Degree
  • Numéro de téléphone: +6281122220052
  • E-mail: m.luthfi@unpad.ac.id

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

  • Nom: Nofri Yandri, Medical Doctor
  • Numéro de téléphone: +6281267271717
  • E-mail: nofriy14@gmail.com

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon de probabilité

Population étudiée

The target population consists of stroke patients in West Java. The accessible population includes stroke patients undergoing treatment at the medical rehabilitation clinic and neurology clinic at RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female18 years of age or older
  • Subacute and chronic stroke patients
  • Able to understand instructions
  • Able to read
  • Can speak Indonesian well
  • Willing to take part in research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have uncorrected severe visual and hearing impairments
  • Have cognitive rehabilitation before research
  • Inability to maintain concentration for approximately 30 minutes

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
Validity/Reliability Group
This group contain post stroke patient that will be given task to work on OCS Plus in accordance with the procedure from the aplication
Subject is going to carry out Indonesian OCS Plus assessment in accordance with the procedure given by the application.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Validity and Reliability of Indonesian OCS Plus
Délai: T0 - Baseline assessment (Day 1) -. Informed consent and Demographic -. MoCA-Ina -. Indonesian OCS-Plus T1 - Retest (48 hours after T0) -.Indonesian OCS-Plus repeated under standardized conditions -.No cognitive rehabilitation intervention between T0-T1

Task-specific OCS-Plus convergent and divergent validity was examined against task-matched validated MoCA tests in a pre-registered Spearman's Rho correlation analyses. Investigator's aimed for correlations >0.30 to demarcate convergence.

The reliability coefficient calculation technique used here is to use the Alpha Reliability Coefficient.

T0 - Baseline assessment (Day 1) -. Informed consent and Demographic -. MoCA-Ina -. Indonesian OCS-Plus T1 - Retest (48 hours after T0) -.Indonesian OCS-Plus repeated under standardized conditions -.No cognitive rehabilitation intervention between T0-T1

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Collaborateurs

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Vitriana Biben, Doctoral, Universitas Padjadjaran

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 octobre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

20 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

14 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

14 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • IKFR-202604.02

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner