Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Healing Gardens: Leveraging Serious Games to Deliver Accessible Pain-CBT and Pharmacologic Support for Patients With Advanced Cancer Managing Pain

14 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Desiree R. Azizoddin PsyD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
This study is being done to determine the feasibility and acceptability of Healing Gardens, a standalone mobile health serious game designed to deliver pain-CBT and cancer pain education to help patients with advanced cancer manage chronic pain.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This is a single-site, interventional feasibility/pilot study evaluating Healing Gardens, a technology-based serious game intervention designed to deliver pain-CBT and cancer pain education for patients with advanced cancer and chronic pain. The study is intended to refine the intervention and establish its initial feasibility, acceptability, and usability through Cohort A content refinement/user acceptability testing and Cohort B pre-pilot testing.

Study procedures include screening and recruitment from DFCI outpatient oncology and palliative care clinics and DFCI satellite clinics at South Shore Health; baseline assessments; medical record abstraction; qualitative interviews and optional focus group/community advisory board activities for Cohort A; usability and acceptability surveys for both cohorts; and, for Cohort B, at-home use of the Healing Gardens game for up to 12 weeks with study contacts to address technical issues and complete end-of-study assessments. Study procedures may be conducted in person, by phone, or through secure HIPAA-compliant video platforms.

It is expected that up to 46 participants will take part in this study, including up to 25 participants in Cohort A and up to 21 participants in Cohort B.

Participation length varies by cohort. Cohort A participants will complete a 30-60 minute interview/user acceptability testing session and may optionally participate in community advisory board meetings up to twice monthly during Year 1. Cohort B participants will test the game at home for up to 12 weeks and complete baseline and end-of-study assessments and a 30-60 minute semi-structured interview. Overall subject accrual and participation are expected to occur over approximately 29 months. There is no long-term follow-up for this study.

This is a DF/HCC PI-sponsored study with funding/support listed from Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center and the National Cancer Institute/NIH/DHHS (R34CA308746, pending).

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

46

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02215
      • Weymouth, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02190

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient is diagnosed with a locally advanced or metastatic solid tumor malignancy, either undergoing active treatment or receiving treatment for an advanced cancer or are receiving supportive/palliative care at DFCI
  • Chronic pain related to cancer or treatment (> pain score of 4 on a 0-10 scale on average over the past two weeks, Numeric Rating Scale)
  • Own/use a compatible device (e.g., smartphone, laptop)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in survivorship: patients who have completed their treatment regimens, are not actively receiving curative or palliative treatment for an advanced cancer, or have a cancer that is in remission
  • Cognitive impairment that would interfere with study participation, as judged by the treating clinician (e.g. delirium, dementia)
  • Inability to speak English (the intervention has not yet been translated to other languages)
  • Enrolled in hospice
  • Currently hospitalized
  • Pain primarily related to a recent surgery (within the last 2 weeks)
  • Conditions that hinder device use (e.g., vision impairment)
  • We will exclude adults who are unable to consent, individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers), pregnant women, and prisoners.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Content Development and Refinement
Participants complete a baseline assessment, a semi-structured interview for content development and refinement and/or optional focus groups, and usability/acceptability surveys.
Participant feedback activities used to optimize the Healing Gardens serious game and related patient-facing content.
Expérimental: Pre-pilot User Acceptability Testing
Participants complete a baseline assessment, at-home testing of the Healing Gardens game for up to 12 weeks, a semi-structured debriefing interview, and end-of-intervention surveys.
A story-led mHealth serious game delivering pain-CBT and cancer pain education, including pain psychoeducation, pain coping skills, cognitive restructuring, and safe/effective opioid use content.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Mean Score of Acceptability E-Scale
Délai: At completion of the participant's game testing period (up to 12 weeks)
Acceptability E-scale is a 6-item self-reported measure of participant acceptability of the intervention. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, yielding a total score ranging from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the intervention. The intervention will be considered acceptable if the mean score exceeds 24 out of 30. (Tariman et al., Appl Nurs Res 2011)
At completion of the participant's game testing period (up to 12 weeks)
Mean Score of System Usability Survey (SUS)
Délai: At completion of the participant's game testing period (up to 12 weeks)
SUS is a 10-item questionnaire used to assess the usability of the intervention. SUS is scored on a scale 0-100 with higher scores representing better acceptability. A score of 75 or higher is deemed acceptable.
At completion of the participant's game testing period (up to 12 weeks)
Module Completion Rate
Délai: At completion of the participant's game testing period (up to 12 weeks)
Module completion rate is defined as the proportion of participants who complete at least 75% of intervention modules (4 of 5 modules).
At completion of the participant's game testing period (up to 12 weeks)
Recruitment Success Rate
Délai: During the 12-month enrollment period beginning in Year 2 of the study.
Recruitment success rate is defined as the proportion of months during the enrollment period in which at least 8 participants provided informed consent.
During the 12-month enrollment period beginning in Year 2 of the study.
Retention Rate
Délai: At completion of the participant's game testing period (up to 12 weeks after enrollment, with enrollment beginning in Year 2).
Retention rate is defined as the proportion of participants who complete the follow-up assessments and provide study data.
At completion of the participant's game testing period (up to 12 weeks after enrollment, with enrollment beginning in Year 2).

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Desiree Azizoddin, PsyD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

13 février 2027

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 juin 2030

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juin 2030

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

14 septembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

17 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

17 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 26-075
  • R34CA308746 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

The Harvard Cancer Consortium encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Délai de partage IPD

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Contact the Belfer office for Dana -Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovations@dfci.harvard.edu

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner