Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

AI-Assisted Anaerobic Threshold Interpretation in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (PACE-Reader)

16 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

A Randomized Two-Period Crossover Reader Study of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Anaerobic Threshold Interpretation in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

This prospective randomized two-period crossover reader study will evaluate whether assistance from a frozen artificial intelligence model improves physicians' interpretation of the anaerobic threshold (AT) in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Sixteen physicians, including 8 senior and 8 junior readers, will each interpret 150 de-identified CPET examinations once without AI assistance and once with AI assistance. The primary outcome is the within-physician difference in absolute AT localization error between the assisted and unassisted conditions. Secondary outcomes include signed timing error, agreement on whether AT is present, estimates within 15 and 30 seconds of the reference, inter-reader reliability, interpretation time, and whether the effect of AI assistance differs by physician seniority.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

The 150 de-identified CPET examinations will be divided into two non-overlapping case libraries, X and Y, with 75 examinations in each library. The libraries will be balanced, as far as feasible, by clinical severity and acquisition characteristics. None of the reader-study examinations will be used for model training, hyperparameter selection, or checkpoint selection.

Within each seniority stratum, physicians will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Sequence A or Sequence B. In period 1, Sequence A will interpret library X without AI assistance and library Y with AI assistance; Sequence B will receive the opposite conditions. Following a 14 ± 3 day washout, the assistance conditions will be reversed in period 2. Case order will be randomized within each period, and new blinded task identifiers will be assigned in period 2. Thus, every physician will interpret every examination once without AI assistance and once with AI assistance, yielding 4,800 interpretations.

In the assisted condition, the interface will display the frozen model's predicted AT time. In the unassisted condition, no model output will be shown. Readers will be masked to case source, routine-report and reference-standard labels, other readers' annotations, and their own annotations from the previous period. For each examination, the reader will classify AT as confirmed, not reached, or unable to confirm. When AT is confirmed, the reader will record the AT time and the interpretive method used. Interpretation time will also be recorded.

The reference standard will be prespecified from unassisted senior-physician annotations. AT will be considered present when at least 6 of 8 senior physicians confirm it, and the reference AT time will be the median of the confirming senior estimates. AT will be considered not reached when at least 6 of 8 senior physicians make that classification. Discordant cases will undergo adjudication by an additional senior physician who is masked to model output and reader identity. For analyses of senior readers, a leave-one-reader-out reference will be used.

The primary analysis will compare absolute AT localization error between assisted and unassisted interpretations using a crossed mixed-effects model. Fixed effects will include assistance condition, physician seniority, the assistance-by-seniority interaction, period, randomized sequence, and case library. Random intercepts will be included for physician and examination. Estimates will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. No simulated or pilot-result data will be included in the prospective study analysis.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

16

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Chine, 200032
        • Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Licensed physician or physician enrolled in a recognized postgraduate clinical training program at the study institution.
  • Eligible for one of the two prespecified seniority strata: senior physicians are attending physicians or above with at least 5 years of independent CPET interpretation experience; junior physicians are residents or specialty trainees with less than 5 years of independent CPET interpretation experience.
  • Able to interpret CPET examinations and use the study interface after standardized orientation.
  • Willing and able to complete both study periods and the prespecified washout interval.
  • Provides written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Direct involvement in development, training, hyperparameter selection, or checkpoint selection of the PACE-Former model.
  • Prior access to the study case libraries, reference-standard annotations, or model outputs for the study examinations.
  • Unable to complete the required interpretation tasks or the 14 ± 3 day washout interval.
  • Withdrawal of consent before completion of study procedures.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Diagnostique
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Sequence A

Period 1: library X interpreted without AI assistance and library Y interpreted with AI assistance. Period 2, after a 14 ± 3 day washout: library X interpreted with AI assistance and library Y interpreted without AI assistance.

A frozen PACE-Former model provides a predicted anaerobic threshold time within the CPET review interface. Physicians retain responsibility for the final classification and AT time annotation. No other model output or reference label is displayed.

The physician reviews the same de-identified CPET data using the study interface without display of any model prediction or AI-generated suggestion and independently classifies AT status and records the AT time when confirmed.

Expérimental: Sequence B

Period 1: library X interpreted with AI assistance and library Y interpreted without AI assistance. Period 2, after a 14 ± 3 day washout: library X interpreted without AI assistance and library Y interpreted with AI assistance.

A frozen PACE-Former model provides a predicted anaerobic threshold time within the CPET review interface. Physicians retain responsibility for the final classification and AT time annotation. No other model output or reference label is displayed.

The physician reviews the same de-identified CPET data using the study interface without display of any model prediction or AI-generated suggestion and independently classifies AT status and records the AT time when confirmed.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Difference in Absolute Anaerobic Threshold Localization Error
Délai: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Absolute difference, in seconds, between the physician-selected AT time and the prespecified expert reference AT time. The primary estimand is the within-physician difference between AI-assisted and unassisted interpretations, analyzed across the same examinations using a crossed mixed-effects model.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Signed Anaerobic Threshold Localization Error
Délai: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Signed difference, in seconds, between the physician-selected AT time and the prespecified expert reference AT time. Negative values indicate earlier placement and positive values indicate later placement relative to the reference.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Proportion of Anaerobic Threshold Estimates Within 15 Seconds of the Reference
Délai: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Proportion of interpretable examinations for which the physician-selected AT time is within 15 seconds, in either direction, of the prespecified expert reference AT time.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Proportion of Anaerobic Threshold Estimates Within 30 Seconds of the Reference
Délai: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Proportion of interpretable examinations for which the physician-selected AT time is within 30 seconds, in either direction, of the prespecified expert reference AT time.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Agreement With the Reference Anaerobic Threshold Status
Délai: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Agreement between the physician classification (AT confirmed, AT not reached, or unable to confirm) and the prespecified expert reference classification. Results will be summarized as overall agreement and condition-specific classification performance.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Inter-Reader Reliability
Délai: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Reliability among physicians for AT timing and AT-status classification under AI-assisted and unassisted conditions, summarized using appropriate intraclass correlation and chance-corrected agreement statistics with 95% confidence intervals.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Interpretation Time per Examination
Délai: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Elapsed time, in seconds, from opening the blinded CPET task to submission of the physician's AT classification and, when applicable, the selected AT time.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Interaction Between AI Assistance and Physician Seniority
Délai: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Difference in the effect of AI assistance between senior and junior physicians, estimated from the prespecified assistance-by-seniority interaction term in the crossed mixed-effects model for absolute AT localization error.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Cong Wang, MD, PhD, Fudan University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

25 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

25 novembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

25 novembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

16 septembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

22 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

22 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner