Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

AI-Assisted Anaerobic Threshold Interpretation in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (PACE-Reader)

16 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

A Randomized Two-Period Crossover Reader Study of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Anaerobic Threshold Interpretation in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

This prospective randomized two-period crossover reader study will evaluate whether assistance from a frozen artificial intelligence model improves physicians' interpretation of the anaerobic threshold (AT) in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Sixteen physicians, including 8 senior and 8 junior readers, will each interpret 150 de-identified CPET examinations once without AI assistance and once with AI assistance. The primary outcome is the within-physician difference in absolute AT localization error between the assisted and unassisted conditions. Secondary outcomes include signed timing error, agreement on whether AT is present, estimates within 15 and 30 seconds of the reference, inter-reader reliability, interpretation time, and whether the effect of AI assistance differs by physician seniority.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

The 150 de-identified CPET examinations will be divided into two non-overlapping case libraries, X and Y, with 75 examinations in each library. The libraries will be balanced, as far as feasible, by clinical severity and acquisition characteristics. None of the reader-study examinations will be used for model training, hyperparameter selection, or checkpoint selection.

Within each seniority stratum, physicians will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Sequence A or Sequence B. In period 1, Sequence A will interpret library X without AI assistance and library Y with AI assistance; Sequence B will receive the opposite conditions. Following a 14 ± 3 day washout, the assistance conditions will be reversed in period 2. Case order will be randomized within each period, and new blinded task identifiers will be assigned in period 2. Thus, every physician will interpret every examination once without AI assistance and once with AI assistance, yielding 4,800 interpretations.

In the assisted condition, the interface will display the frozen model's predicted AT time. In the unassisted condition, no model output will be shown. Readers will be masked to case source, routine-report and reference-standard labels, other readers' annotations, and their own annotations from the previous period. For each examination, the reader will classify AT as confirmed, not reached, or unable to confirm. When AT is confirmed, the reader will record the AT time and the interpretive method used. Interpretation time will also be recorded.

The reference standard will be prespecified from unassisted senior-physician annotations. AT will be considered present when at least 6 of 8 senior physicians confirm it, and the reference AT time will be the median of the confirming senior estimates. AT will be considered not reached when at least 6 of 8 senior physicians make that classification. Discordant cases will undergo adjudication by an additional senior physician who is masked to model output and reader identity. For analyses of senior readers, a leave-one-reader-out reference will be used.

The primary analysis will compare absolute AT localization error between assisted and unassisted interpretations using a crossed mixed-effects model. Fixed effects will include assistance condition, physician seniority, the assistance-by-seniority interaction, period, randomized sequence, and case library. Random intercepts will be included for physician and examination. Estimates will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. No simulated or pilot-result data will be included in the prospective study analysis.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

16

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Locais de estudo

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200032
        • Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Licensed physician or physician enrolled in a recognized postgraduate clinical training program at the study institution.
  • Eligible for one of the two prespecified seniority strata: senior physicians are attending physicians or above with at least 5 years of independent CPET interpretation experience; junior physicians are residents or specialty trainees with less than 5 years of independent CPET interpretation experience.
  • Able to interpret CPET examinations and use the study interface after standardized orientation.
  • Willing and able to complete both study periods and the prespecified washout interval.
  • Provides written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Direct involvement in development, training, hyperparameter selection, or checkpoint selection of the PACE-Former model.
  • Prior access to the study case libraries, reference-standard annotations, or model outputs for the study examinations.
  • Unable to complete the required interpretation tasks or the 14 ± 3 day washout interval.
  • Withdrawal of consent before completion of study procedures.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Diagnóstico
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Sequence A

Period 1: library X interpreted without AI assistance and library Y interpreted with AI assistance. Period 2, after a 14 ± 3 day washout: library X interpreted with AI assistance and library Y interpreted without AI assistance.

A frozen PACE-Former model provides a predicted anaerobic threshold time within the CPET review interface. Physicians retain responsibility for the final classification and AT time annotation. No other model output or reference label is displayed.

The physician reviews the same de-identified CPET data using the study interface without display of any model prediction or AI-generated suggestion and independently classifies AT status and records the AT time when confirmed.

Experimental: Sequence B

Period 1: library X interpreted with AI assistance and library Y interpreted without AI assistance. Period 2, after a 14 ± 3 day washout: library X interpreted without AI assistance and library Y interpreted with AI assistance.

A frozen PACE-Former model provides a predicted anaerobic threshold time within the CPET review interface. Physicians retain responsibility for the final classification and AT time annotation. No other model output or reference label is displayed.

The physician reviews the same de-identified CPET data using the study interface without display of any model prediction or AI-generated suggestion and independently classifies AT status and records the AT time when confirmed.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Difference in Absolute Anaerobic Threshold Localization Error
Prazo: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Absolute difference, in seconds, between the physician-selected AT time and the prespecified expert reference AT time. The primary estimand is the within-physician difference between AI-assisted and unassisted interpretations, analyzed across the same examinations using a crossed mixed-effects model.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Signed Anaerobic Threshold Localization Error
Prazo: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Signed difference, in seconds, between the physician-selected AT time and the prespecified expert reference AT time. Negative values indicate earlier placement and positive values indicate later placement relative to the reference.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Proportion of Anaerobic Threshold Estimates Within 15 Seconds of the Reference
Prazo: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Proportion of interpretable examinations for which the physician-selected AT time is within 15 seconds, in either direction, of the prespecified expert reference AT time.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Proportion of Anaerobic Threshold Estimates Within 30 Seconds of the Reference
Prazo: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Proportion of interpretable examinations for which the physician-selected AT time is within 30 seconds, in either direction, of the prespecified expert reference AT time.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Agreement With the Reference Anaerobic Threshold Status
Prazo: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Agreement between the physician classification (AT confirmed, AT not reached, or unable to confirm) and the prespecified expert reference classification. Results will be summarized as overall agreement and condition-specific classification performance.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Inter-Reader Reliability
Prazo: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Reliability among physicians for AT timing and AT-status classification under AI-assisted and unassisted conditions, summarized using appropriate intraclass correlation and chance-corrected agreement statistics with 95% confidence intervals.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Interpretation Time per Examination
Prazo: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Elapsed time, in seconds, from opening the blinded CPET task to submission of the physician's AT classification and, when applicable, the selected AT time.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months
Interaction Between AI Assistance and Physician Seniority
Prazo: Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Difference in the effect of AI assistance between senior and junior physicians, estimated from the prespecified assistance-by-seniority interaction term in the crossed mixed-effects model for absolute AT localization error.

Recorded immediately after each case interpretation and analyzed after completion of both study periods, up to 2 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Cong Wang, MD, PhD, Fudan University

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

25 de setembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

25 de novembro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

25 de novembro de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

16 de setembro de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

16 de setembro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

22 de setembro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

22 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

16 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever