Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

MOVE-HIP: Ceramic Hip Resurfacing Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Activity Monitoring (MOVE-HIP)

21 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Olof Skoldenberg, Danderyd Hospital

A Pragmatic, Multicenter, Patient-Blinded, Preference-Tolerant Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Ceramic Hip Resurfacing With Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Activity Monitoring

MOVE-HIP is a pragmatic, multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty with contemporary total hip arthroplasty in adults with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis who are considered clinically eligible for both procedures. Participants in the randomized cohort are allocated 1:1 to either ceramic hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty and are kept blinded to treatment allocation where feasible through the 24-month primary follow-up.

The primary objective is to determine whether ceramic hip resurfacing results in greater objectively measured mean daily walking distance over the postoperative period from 3 to 24 months. Activity is assessed during standardized 7-day wearable monitoring periods at 3, 12, and 24 months. The primary estimand is the adjusted overall between-group difference across these postoperative time points. A parallel observational preference cohort may include otherwise eligible patients who decline randomization; this cohort is analyzed separately and does not contribute to the primary randomized inference.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

The trial is designed to test whether a contemporary ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing strategy provides a clinically meaningful advantage over modern total hip arthroplasty in real-world physical activity. Randomization is stratified by study site and sex. All participants undergo baseline assessment including patient-reported outcomes, radiographs, clinical data, and 7-day wearable activity monitoring before surgery.

The randomized cohort includes 220 participants, 110 per treatment group. Follow-up is planned at 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years. Secondary outcomes include walking distance at 24 months, daily step count, patient-reported outcomes, radiographic outcomes, perioperative outcomes, complications, reoperations, revisions, implant survival, and health-economic outcomes. The study is academically led, and the observational preference cohort follows the same assessment schedule but is analyzed separately.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

220

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

      • Danderyd, Suède, 182 88
        • Recrutement
        • Danderyd Hospital
        • Chercheur principal:
          • Olof Sköldenberg, MD, PhD

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Symptomatic hip osteoarthritis for which primary hip arthroplasty is indicated according to routine clinical practice.
  • Considered suitable for both ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty and uncemented total hip arthroplasty by the treating surgeon.
  • Ability and willingness to comply with study procedures, including patient-reported outcome measures, radiographs, registry linkage, and repeated wearable monitoring.
  • Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anatomical or pathological conditions that clearly preclude hip resurfacing arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty, including severe deformity requiring non-standard implants or techniques.
  • Insufficient femoral head or acetabular bone quality, including large or multiple cysts, advanced femoral head necrosis, severe osteopenia, or osteoporosis where this would contraindicate hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
  • Body mass index greater than 40 kg/m^2.
  • Requirement for specialized implants outside routine study procedures.
  • Medical comorbidity rendering the patient unfit for surgery.
  • Cognitive impairment, severe psychiatric disease, alcohol or substance abuse, language barrier, or other reason judged to prevent informed consent or compliance with follow-up.
  • Inability to complete patient-reported outcome measures or to participate in wearable monitoring.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Ceramic Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Participants undergo cementless ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty using the selected study system according to manufacturer instructions, surgeon training requirements, and local surgical routines.

Cementless ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The currently planned study implant is H1, or a subsequent equivalent generation if applicable. Procedures are performed by surgeons with documented arthroplasty experience and system-specific training.

Autres noms:
  • H1 ceramic hip resurfacing
Comparateur actif: Total Hip Arthroplasty

Participants undergo contemporary standard primary total hip arthroplasty using established implants and bearing combinations according to local routine and individual clinical assessment. Cementless fixation is expected in most cases where clinically appropriate.

Contemporary standard primary total hip arthroplasty using established implants and bearing combinations according to local routine and individual clinical assessment. Implant choice remains clinically appropriate for the individual participant.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Mean Daily Walking Distance Over the Postoperative Period From 3 to 24 Months
Délai: 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Mean daily walking distance is assessed during standardized 7-day wearable monitoring periods at each postoperative time point. The primary estimand is the adjusted overall between-group difference in mean daily walking distance across 3, 12, and 24 months, with adjustment for preoperative walking distance and prespecified covariates.

3, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Mean Daily Walking Distance at 24 Months
Délai: 24 months after surgery

Mean daily walking distance derived from a standardized 7-day wearable monitoring period at 24 months.

24 months after surgery
Mean Daily Step Count Over the Postoperative Period From 3 to 24 Months
Délai: 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Mean daily step count derived from standardized 7-day wearable monitoring periods at 3, 12, and 24 months.

3, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) at 24 Months
Délai: 24 months after surgery

Joint awareness assessed using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less awareness of the operated joint during everyday activities and a better outcome.

24 months after surgery
Proportion of Participants With FJS-12 Score of 80 or Higher
Délai: 24 months after surgery

Proportion of participants achieving a Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) of at least 80. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less awareness of the operated joint during everyday activities and a better outcome.

24 months after surgery
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) Subscales
Délai: 24 months after surgery

HOOS Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sport/Recreation, and Quality of Life subscales at 24 months. Each subscale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better status.

24 months after surgery
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score
Délai: 24 months after surgery

Self-reported habitual physical activity level assessed using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score. Scores range from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating a higher level of physical activity and a better activity-related outcome.

24 months after surgery
High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS)
Délai: 24 months after surgery

Self-reported functional ability assessed using the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS), covering walking, running, stair climbing, and activity level. Total scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater functional ability and a better outcome.

24 months after surgery
EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L Index)
Délai: 24 months after surgery

Health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Responses are converted into an index using the Swedish experience-based time trade-off value set (Burström et al., 2020). Index values range from approximately 0.243 to 0.975, with higher values indicating better health-related quality of life.

24 months after surgery
EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS)
Délai: 24 months after surgery

Self-rated overall health assessed using the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). Scores range from 0 (the worst health imaginable) to 100 (the best health imaginable), with higher scores indicating better perceived health.

24 months after surgery
Radiographic Implant and Hip Biomechanics Outcomes
Délai: 24 months after surgery

Radiographic assessment includes component orientation and fixation, radiolucent lines, migration or loosening, heterotopic ossification, leg length and offset where feasible. In the hip resurfacing group, femoral neck integrity, notching, narrowing, fracture, femoral head movement or crushing, and component alignment are additionally assessed.

24 months after surgery
Adverse Events and Postoperative Complications
Délai: From surgery through 24 months

Incidence and type of adverse events and complications, including infection, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, femoral neck fracture, implant fracture, thromboembolic events, nerve injury, wound complications, persistent pain, and other procedure- or implant-related events.

From surgery through 24 months
Reoperations and Revisions of the Index Hip
Délai: From surgery through 24 months

Number and proportion of participants undergoing reoperation or revision of the index hip, including reason and components exchanged or removed.

From surgery through 24 months
Health-Economic Outcomes
Délai: From surgery through 24 months

Quality-adjusted life years derived from EQ-5D and incremental cost-effectiveness comparing ceramic hip resurfacing with total hip arthroplasty over 24 months, using available direct and indirect cost data.

From surgery through 24 months
Long-Term Implant Survival
Délai: 5 and 10 years after surgery

Revision-free implant survival assessed using study follow-up and registry data at 5 and 10 years.

5 and 10 years after surgery

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Olof Sköldenberg, MD, PhD, Danderyd Hospital, Region Stockholm / Karolinska Institutet

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

25 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 décembre 2031

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 décembre 2039

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

16 septembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

24 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

24 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Description du régime IPD

Undecided as of yet pending IRB approval.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner