Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Myo-Reps Versus Traditional Sets for Muscle Strength, Fat-Free Mass, and Time Efficiency

30 octobre 2026 mis à jour par: Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Myo-Reps Versus Traditional Sets for Muscle Strength, Fat-Free Mass, and Time Efficiency: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study compared two ways of doing strength training in healthy adults. The first, called Myo-Reps, is a time-saving method: one hard first set of 8-15 repetitions, followed by three short "mini-sets" of 3-5 repetitions with only 10-20 seconds of rest in between. The second is traditional training: three sets of 8-15 repetitions with 1-3 minutes of rest between sets.

Thirty-four adults were randomly assigned, by chance, to one of the two groups. For nine weeks everyone trained twice a week, under supervision, doing full-body workouts on 10 gym machines. The researchers measured how much stronger people became on each exercise, how much their fat-free mass (muscle and other lean tissue) changed, how hard the sessions felt, how much weight and how many repetitions were lifted, and how long the sessions took.

The aim was to find out whether the shorter Myo-Reps workouts can build strength and fat-free mass as well as traditional training.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Rationale: Lack of time is a common barrier to resistance training. The study tested two competing predictions. If total volume load (load × repetitions) is the main driver of adaptation, traditional three-set training should give greater improvements. If repetitions performed close to failure matter more, Myo-Reps could give similar or greater improvements despite less volume and shorter sessions.

Design: Parallel-group randomized trial in healthy adults, 1:1 allocation, stratified by gender and age, using a central web-based randomization system run by an independent trial unit; allocation was concealed until enrolment. All sessions were directly supervised, and load progression rules were identical in both groups. Week 1: familiarization and baseline body composition. Week 2: baseline strength testing. Weeks 3-11: training. Week 12: repeat testing.

Analysis: No sample-size calculation was performed (convenience sample). Strength comparisons are exploratory and analysed separately for each exercise.

Registration note: This record was registered retrospectively, after data collection was completed. Outcomes are described as defined in the manuscript submitted for publication.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

34

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Trøndelag
      • Trondheim, Trøndelag, Norvège, 7030
        • Sit Trening HelgasetrSit

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 65 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years
  • Generally good health
  • No medical contraindications for heavy resistance training

Exclusion Criteria:

  • highly advanced trainees
  • pregnancy

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Myo-Rep

Nine weeks (weeks 3-11) of two supervised full-body sessions per week on 10 resistance-training machines. For each exercise: one activation set of 8-15 repetitions close to failure, followed by three mini-sets of 3-5 repetitions with the same load, separated by 10-20 seconds of rest. Load progression criteria were identical to the traditional training group.

Supervised full-body machine-based resistance training, twice weekly for nine weeks. Each exercise: one activation set of 8-15 repetitions close to failure, then three mini-sets of 3-5 repetitions with the same load and 10-20 seconds of rest between sets.

Comparateur actif: Traditional three-set training

Nine weeks (weeks 3-11) of two supervised full-body sessions per week on the same 10 resistance-training machines. For each exercise: three sets of 8-15 repetitions separated by 1-3 minutes of rest. Load progression criteria were identical to the Myo-Reps group.

Supervised full-body machine-based resistance training, twice weekly for nine weeks, using the same 10 exercises. Each exercise: three sets of 8-15 repetitions with 1-3 minutes of rest between sets.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in exercise-specific muscular strength (estimated one-repetition maximum, e1RM) across 10 machine exercises
Délai: Baseline (week 2) to post-intervention (week 12)

e1RM was derived from 3-10 repetition-maximum tests (Epley equation) for each of the 10 trained machine exercises. Each exercise was analysed separately, and the between-group difference in change from baseline to post-intervention is the outcome.

Baseline (week 2) to post-intervention (week 12)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in fat-free mass
Délai: Baseline (week 1) to post-intervention (week 12)

Measured by bioelectrical impedance (InBody 770).

Baseline (week 1) to post-intervention (week 12)
Session duration
Délai: Training weeks 3-11

Time taken to complete a training session, averaged per participant.

Training weeks 3-11
Weekly volume load
Délai: Training weeks 3-11

Load × repetitions, summed across exercises and averaged per week.

Training weeks 3-11
Repetitions close to failure
Délai: raining weeks 3-11

Estimated number of repetitions performed close to muscular failure during training.

raining weeks 3-11
Session rating of perceived exertion (session RPE)
Délai: Training weeks 3-11

Participant-rated exertion for each training session.

Training weeks 3-11

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Marius S Fimland, Phd, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

26 août 2025

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

3 décembre 2025

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

3 décembre 2025

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 octobre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 octobre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

3 novembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

3 novembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 octobre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 octobre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request to the corresponding author, after publication of the main article. Requests should include a brief research proposal.

Délai de partage IPD

Data will be available beginning after publication of the main article and for at least 5 years thereafter.

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

De-identified individual participant data will be shared with qualified researchers on reasonable request to the corresponding author (Philip Meisterl, NTNU), who will review each request. Requesters should provide a short research proposal. Data are shared only for scientific research purposes, consistent with participants' consent and Norwegian data protection regulations (GDPR). Data will be sent securely by email or a secure file-transfer link.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner