Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Electrical Brain Stimulation for College Students With Short-Form Video Addiction: Effects and Mechanisms

6 novembre 2026 mis à jour par: Beijing Normal University

Effects and Mechanisms of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) Intervention on Short-Form Video Addiction

The researchers will test whether high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) combined with real-time short-form video cue exposure can reduce addiction severity and daily usage time in college students with problematic short-form video use. By modulating the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, this study aims to explore whether the treatment improves executive function (such as self-control and risk decision-making) and emotional-cognitive processes (such as craving and attentional bias). Assessments will be conducted before, immediately after the 2-week intervention, and at a 4-week follow-up, using both subjective surveys and objective computer cognitive tasks. Results could pave the way for a low-cost, non-invasive, and scalable intervention strategy to address the growing public health concern of short-form video addiction among young adults.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Over the past few years, problematic short-form video use has emerged as a significant public health concern among college students, associated with impaired executive function, academic decline, and emotional distress. Neuroimaging studies suggest that excessive short-form video consumption is linked to hypoactivity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which disrupts the balance between cognitive control and reward-driven habits. However, evidence-based non-pharmacological interventions for short-form video addiction remain scarce.

This study builds upon the dual-pathway model of internet addiction and utilizes a high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) protocol with a 4x1 ring configuration targeting the right dlPFC (center anode with 4 surrounding return electrodes) to restore prefrontal control. Participants will receive 10 daily HD-tDCS sessions over 2 consecutive weeks. Crucially, to enhance the targeted therapeutic effect, participants will undergo concurrent cue exposure-watching short-form videos on their personal mobile phones for 12 minutes during each 15-minute active or sham HD-tDCS session.

This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial (N=82) employs a longitudinal design with three assessment time points (baseline, post-intervention at week 2, and a 4-week follow-up). We hypothesize that active HD-tDCS will significantly reduce addiction symptoms and usage duration compared to sham. Furthermore, we propose a parallel mediation model to explore the underlying mechanisms: specifically, whether the intervention effect is mediated by improvements in executive function (response inhibition and risk decision-making) and emotional-cognitive pathways (reductions in craving and attentional bias). Results may inform the development of scalable, neuroplasticity-based interventions to mitigate digital addiction and promote mental well-being in young adults.

The sample size was determined a priori using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7). Based on the effect size (Cohen's f = 0.35) derived from previous meta-analytic findings regarding multiple-session tDCS interventions, assuming an alpha error probability of 0.05, a statistical power of 0.80, 2 groups, and 3 repeated measurements (i.e., pre-test, post-test, and 4-week follow-up), a minimum total sample size of 82 participants is required.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

82

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • Chine
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 100088
        • Department of Psychology, Beijing Normal University
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 30 ans (Adulte)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 30 years.
  • Currently enrolled as a university student.
  • Right-handed.
  • Meets the threshold for problematic short-form video use, as assessed by the Short-form Video Addiction Scale.
  • Primary use: The participant's primary problematic internet use is short-form videos, rather than other behaviors such as online gaming.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed psychiatric disorders.
  • History of neurological disease or traumatic brain injury.
  • History of epilepsy or a family history of epilepsy.
  • Presence of medical implants (e.g., cardiac pacemakers, cochlear implants).
  • Currently receiving pharmacological or psychological treatment.
  • History of receiving any non-invasive brain stimulation (e.g., tDCS, TMS, or tACS) within the past year.
  • Any other contraindications to HD-tDCS (e.g., history of skin lesions/scalp conditions at the electrode sites) or severe physical diseases identified during safety screening.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Active HD-tDCS Group

Participants receive active high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) using a NeuroConn stimulator. A 4x1 ring electrode configuration is applied: the center anodal (positive) electrode is placed over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F4), surrounded by four cathodal (negative) return electrodes. The stimulation is delivered at 1.5 mA for 15 minutes. Participants receive one session per day, 5 days per week, for 2 consecutive weeks.
Dispositif: Active High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Active HD-tDCS)

Description: Active HD-tDCS is delivered using a NeuroConn device with a 4x1 ring configuration (center anodal electrode over the right dlPFC, surrounded by 4 cathodal returns). The stimulation is delivered at 1.5 mA for 15 minutes. Participants receive 10 sessions over 2 consecutive weeks (5 days/week). Concurrently during the stimulation, participants watch short-form videos on their mobile phones for approximately 14-15 minutes (using the same platform identified at baseline). A pre-programmed active code ensures strict double-blinding.
Comparateur factice: Sham HD-tDCS Group

Participants receive sham HD-tDCS using the identical NeuroConn device, 4x1 ring electrode configuration, and procedure as the active group. The device delivers a brief current (ramped up and down over 30 seconds) at the beginning of the 15-minute session to mimic the initial skin sensation, but the current is turned off for the remainder of the session. Participants receive one session per day, 5 days per week, for 2 consecutive weeks.
Dispositif: Sham High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Sham HD-tDCS)

Description: Sham HD-tDCS uses the identical NeuroConn device and 4x1 ring configuration as the active group. The current is ramped up for 30 seconds and then turned off for the remainder of the 15-minute session to mimic the initial skin sensation. Participants receive 10 sessions over 2 consecutive weeks (5 days/week). Concurrently during the sham stimulation, participants watch short-form videos on their mobile phones for approximately 14-15 minutes (using the same platform identified at baseline). A pre-programmed sham code ensures strict double-blinding.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Short-form Video Addiction Scale Score
Délai: Baseline (Pre-test), Week 2 (Post-test), and Follow-up at 4 weeks after the intervention

Assessed using the 25-item Short-form Video Addiction Scale, which includes two dimensions: Addictive Dependence and Negative Consequence. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). The total score ranges from 25 to 175. A higher score indicates a more severe level of short-form video addiction.
Baseline (Pre-test), Week 2 (Post-test), and Follow-up at 4 weeks after the intervention
Change in Average Daily Short-form Video Use Duration
Délai: Baseline (Pre-test), Week 2 (Post-test), and Follow-up at 4 weeks after the intervention

Self-reported average time (in minutes) spent watching short-form videos per day over the past week. A higher duration indicates more excessive use.
Baseline (Pre-test), Week 2 (Post-test), and Follow-up at 4 weeks after the intervention

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Executive Function Composite Score (SSRT & BART)
Délai: Baseline (Pre-test), Week 2 (Post-test), and Follow-up at 4 weeks after the intervention

A composite executive function score will be derived using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) from two tasks: (1) Stop-Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) from the Stop-Signal Task, and (2) Adjusted Average Pumps (AAP) from the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). The factor score extracted from the EFA will serve as the composite indicator, accounting for the relative weighting of each measure. Factor scores will be oriented such that higher values indicate better overall executive function.
Baseline (Pre-test), Week 2 (Post-test), and Follow-up at 4 weeks after the intervention
Change in Emotion-Cognition Composite Score (Craving, ABS, ER)
Délai: Baseline (Pre-test), Week 2 (Post-test), and Follow-up at 4 weeks after the intervention

A composite emotion-cognition score will be derived using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) from three measures: (1) Craving Score, (2) Attentional Bias Score (ABS) from the dot-probe task, and (3) Emotion Regulation Score. The factor score extracted from the EFA will serve as the composite indicator to capture the shared variance among these measures. Factor scores will be oriented such that higher values indicate more favorable emotional-cognitive outcomes.
Baseline (Pre-test), Week 2 (Post-test), and Follow-up at 4 weeks after the intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Beijing Normal University

Collaborateurs

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Liens utiles

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

15 novembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 mai 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 juin 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

6 novembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

6 novembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

12 novembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

12 novembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

6 novembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 octobre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • BNU202610120439

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner