Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Video-based Project to Improve Colonoscopy Quality in Lower-Volume Clinicians

9 novembre 2026 mis à jour par: Anthony Yang, Indiana University

Video-based Bundle to Improve Screening Colonoscopy Quality in Lower-volume Clinicians

The goals of this project are to learn whether a quality improvement report card assessing technical skills from AI-augmented expert review of video recordings improves doctors' colonoscopy performance. Colonoscopy performance is important because colonoscopies are how doctors detect and remove pre-cancerous polyps. The participants in this study are doctors, usually surgeons, who perform some colonoscopies as part of their practice. These doctors usually do not receive feedback on their performance, and therefore lack information on how to potentially improve their ability to detect and remove pre-cancerous polyps.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Are there ways we should customize the colonoscopy quality improvement report card to the participating doctors?
  2. Does customizing the report card lead to better acceptance of the information shared?

(2) Does the colonoscopy quality improvement report card improve doctors' colonoscopy performance?

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Colonoscopy reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality through the detection and removal of pre-cancerous polyps (adenomas), but the magnitude of risk reduction depends upon the quality of the colonoscopy. Most colonoscopy quality improvement (QI) initiatives have focused on higher-volume gastroenterologists. In rural and peri-urban communities in the United States, most colonoscopies are performed by lower-volume colonoscopists, who are mostly surgeons, and CRC outcomes are worse compared to urban areas. These lower-volume colonoscopists have marked variability in quality and many fail to adhere to best practices or meet national benchmarks. Higher adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the quality metric most associated with reduced CRC mortality. However, ADR is less accurate at lower colonoscopy volumes, suggesting that ADR alone cannot reliably differentiate quality or provide meaningful information to improve quality in lower-volume colonoscopists. Thus, alternative methods to measure and improve quality in lower-volume colonoscopists are needed. Video evaluation of procedures such as colonoscopy is a valuable tool for assessing and improving technical skills in multiple specialties. In prior work, we found that higher-volume gastroenterologists' colonoscopy skill, assessed by expert evaluation of video-recorded colonoscopies using a validated technical skill scoring rubric, is highly correlated with quality metrics requires fewer colonoscopies for accurate assessment, and correlates with ADR. Further, we showed that delivery of focused feedback based on technical skill scores improves colonoscopy quality. While expert video evaluation of colonoscopies is an effective tool to measure and improve quality in lower-volume colonoscopists, it is not feasible on a larger scale given the time and cost of manual video review. We therefore developed and validated an AI-based tool that identifies key steps in colonoscopy videos, for rapid expert review and scoring. This study focuses on the implementation and evaluation of an AI-augmented intervention to improve colonoscopy quality of lower-volume colonoscopists in rural and peri-urban areas to ultimately reduce CRC mortality. The intervention, the "Colonoscopy Quality Improvement Bundle" (ColonQI Bundle), combines (1) AI-augmented expert assessment and scoring of technical skills; (2) AI-augmented automated calculation of quality metrics (e.g., ADR, withdrawal time), and (3) Targeted feedback of specific technical skill deficits based on the scores (audit-feedback, structured video-based didactics, coaching, mentoring). Lower-volume colonoscopists, with a focus on surgeons will be recruited to: (1) Assess the needs and preferences of, and select strategies for implementation of the ColonQI Bundle using an implementation science framework; (2) Implement the ColonQI Bundle, using tailored implementation strategies tailored to the needs and preferences of lower-volume colonoscopists; and (3) Assess the effectiveness of the ColonQI Bundle to improve colonoscopy quality and technical skills among lower-volume colonoscopists.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

15

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Brianna D'Orazio, MPH
  • Numéro de téléphone: 317-274-3220
  • E-mail: bdorazio@iu.edu

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgeons or gastroenterologists who perform 10-600 colonoscopies per year and who practice at a hospital affiliated with the Illiana Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC)

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Colonosopy Quality Improvement

Participating colonoscopists will receive the Colonoscopy Quality Improvement Bundle

The "Colonoscopy Quality Improvement Bundle" (ColonQI Bundle) combines (1) calculation of quality metrics (e.g., CIR, WT); (2) AI-augmented expert technical skills assessment; and (3) targeted feedback of specific technical skill deficits (audit-feedback, structured video-based didactics, coaching, mentoring).

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Pre-post Change in Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) at the individual and cohort levels
Délai: From baseline (the end of the pre-ColonQI Bundle period, prior to the delivery of the ColonQI Bundle) through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.

The rate at which a colonoscopist detects adenomas (pre-cancerous polyps) during a colonoscopy in an average-risk population.

From baseline (the end of the pre-ColonQI Bundle period, prior to the delivery of the ColonQI Bundle) through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Colonoscopist technical skill scores (E-CTSS) assessed by expert review of video-recorded colonoscopies at the individual and cohort levels
Délai: From baseline (the end of the pre-ColonQI Bundle period, prior to the delivery of the ColonQI Bundle) through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.

Total E-CTSS score; composite of 3 individually scored skills (cleaning, distention, and examination behind colon folds)

From baseline (the end of the pre-ColonQI Bundle period, prior to the delivery of the ColonQI Bundle) through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.
Pre-post Change in Withdrawal time (WT) at the individual and cohort levels
Délai: From baseline (the end of the pre-ColonQI Bundle period, prior to the delivery of the ColonQI Bundle) through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.

Time spent inspecting the colon for polyps in screening and surveillance colonoscopies (not including time spent on polyp removal or biopsies)

From baseline (the end of the pre-ColonQI Bundle period, prior to the delivery of the ColonQI Bundle) through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.
Pre-post change in Sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SDR) at the individual and cohort levels
Délai: From baseline (the end of the pre-ColonQI Bundle period, prior to the delivery of the ColonQI Bundle) through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.

Proportion of colonoscopies in which a serrated polyp is removed

From baseline (the end of the pre-ColonQI Bundle period, prior to the delivery of the ColonQI Bundle) through study completion, an average of 1.5 years.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Anthony Yang, MD MS, Indiana University
  • Chercheur principal: Rajesh Keswani, MD, Northwestern University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 novembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 octobre 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juillet 2029

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

3 novembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 novembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

13 novembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

13 novembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 novembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 novembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 31536
  • 1R01DK147605 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner