このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Pilot Study Of Pregabalin And Prediction Of Treatment Response In Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia

2014年6月6日 更新者：Pfizer

A Phase 4 Multicenter, Open-Label, Pilot Study Of Pregabalin And Prediction Of Treatment Response In Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia

The primary objective is to explore whether sensory symptom cluster analysis is useful for predicting treatment response in Postherpetic Neuralgia.

調査の概要

状態

終了しました

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

The study was stopped on 26 April 2013 due to feasibility issues (low enrollment) not safety. The overall risk-benefit of Lyrica has not changed at all due to termination of this trial. Only 9 of the 150 patients were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

9

段階

  • フェーズ 4

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

  • アメリカ
    • Florida
      • Leesburg、Florida、アメリカ、34748
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington、Kentucky、アメリカ、40509
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh、North Carolina、アメリカ、27612
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Jekintown、Pennsylvania、アメリカ、19046
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • オーストリア
      • Wien、オーストリア、A-1010
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • A-3541
      • Senftenberg、A-3541、オーストリア
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • ドイツ
      • Schwerin、ドイツ、19053
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • 南アフリカ
    • Gauteng
      • Pretoria、Gauteng、南アフリカ、0122
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Western Cape
      • Paarl、Western Cape、南アフリカ、7626
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have pain present for more than 3 months after the healing of the herpes zoster skin rash.
  • At screening (V1) and baseline (V2), subjects must have a score of >=4 on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (1 week recall period).
  • At baseline (V2), at least 4 pain diaries must be completed satisfactorily within the last 7 days and the average pain score must be >=4.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects having other severe pain that may confound assessment or self evaluation of the pain due to PHN.
  • Neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy for Postherpetic Neuralgia
  • Skin conditions in the affected dermatome that could alter sensation.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか？

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的：処理
  • 割り当て：なし
  • 介入モデル：単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的：Pregabalin (300-600 mg/day; 150 mg/day starting dose)
薬：pregabalin
Pregabalin Capsules (150 mg - 600mg), Dose titration (4 weeks) and fixed dose (2 weeks) for a 6 week treatment period.

この研究は何を測定していますか？

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change From Baseline in the Daily Pain Diary (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS) Mean Pain Score at the End of the Study (Week 6).
時間枠：Baseline, Week 6
The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.
Baseline, Week 6

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) at All Visits.
時間枠：All visits
NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100. Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
All visits
Proportion of Phenotypes Within the 30% and 50% Responder Groups at Baseline and Week 6.
時間枠：Baseline, Week 6
To explore whether sensory symptom cluster analysis is useful for predicting treatment response in paticipants with PHN, identification of the phenotype was initially required of all participants using three different approaches (with or without the baseline PHQ-8, GAD-7 Pain Related Sleep Interference Score Scale, PCS): 1. PainDETECT at baseline, 2. PainPREDICT at baseline, 3. NPSI at baseline. Then for each of the above phenotypes the distribution of the pregabalin responders (using 30% and 50%) were to be compared.
Baseline, Week 6
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 6/Early Termination.
時間枠：Week 6/Early Termination
PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Week 6/Early Termination
Proportions of Participants With >/=30% and >/=50% Pain Reduction Based on Daily Pain Diary at Baseline and Week 6.
時間枠：Baseline, Week 6
The daily pain diary consists of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants describe their pain during the previous 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment is performed daily at bedtime on a telephone via interactive voice response system (IVRS). The endpoint mean pain score is defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in the open-label phase. Daily pain IVRS diaries were completed daily at bedtime from Visit 1 (Screening) through Visit 7/Early Termination. Participants were asked to complete their first IVRS daily at bedtime on the morning after Visit 1.
Baseline, Week 6
Proportion of Participants Within Each Phenotype Group as Determined by Sensory Symptom Clustering Using the PainPREDICT, PainDETECT and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory at Baseline and Week 6.
時間枠：Baseline, Week 6
To explore whether sensory symptom cluster analysis is useful for predicting treatment response in paticipants with PHN, identification of the phenotype was initially required of all participants using three different approaches (with or without the baseline PHQ-8, GAD-7 Pain Related Sleep Interference Score Scale, PCS): 1. PainDETECT at baseline, 2. PainPREDICT at baseline, 3. NPSI at baseline.
Baseline, Week 6
Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) at Baseline and Week 6; Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at Screening, Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6/Early Termination.
時間枠：Screening, Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6/Early Termination
The PHQ-8 is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The PHQ-8 is a validated subset of the PHQ-9, which comprises the first 8 items of the measure. The GAD-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses anxiety. Participants respond as to how each item applies to them on a 4 point response scale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety.
Screening, Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6/Early Termination
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI sf) at Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6.
時間枠：Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6
The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) consists of 5 questions. Questions 1, 2, 3, and 4 measure pain on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible).
Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6
Patient Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6.
時間枠：Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6
The PCS is a 13-item self report instrument and requires a Grade 6 reading level and has been translated into 12 languages. It instructs participants to reflect on past experience of pain and indicate their experience using a 5-point scale. The PCS was designed for research on catastrophizing and pain experience. Catastrophizing is associated with heightened pain and is "an exaggerated negative mental set brought to bear during actual or anticipated painful experience." It is a multidimensional construct compromising elements of rumination, magnification, and helplessness and its factor structure has been replicated. It has a total score and three subscale scores (score range of 0-52).
Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6
Pain NRS Score; 1 Week Recall Period.
時間枠：1 Week
The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.
1 Week
Short Form 12v2 Health Survey (SF 12v2) at Visit 2 (Week 0), and Week 6/Early Termination.
時間枠：Visit 2 (Week 0), and Week 6/Early Termination
The Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12v2) is a self-administered, validated questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health aspects: Physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perception over the past week. Higher scores indicate a better health-related quality of life.
Visit 2 (Week 0), and Week 6/Early Termination
Change From Baseline to End of the Study (Week 6) in the Daily Sleep Interference Diary (NRS) Mean Pain Score.
時間枠：Baseline, Week 6
The pain-related sleep interference item rating scale is scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-Sleep). It is self-administered by the participant in order to rate how pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Participants are to describe how their pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number on the numeric rating scale.
Baseline, Week 6

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

Pfizer

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

便利なリンク

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2012年10月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2013年6月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2013年6月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2012年4月16日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2012年5月18日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2012年5月22日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2014年7月8日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2014年6月6日

最終確認日

2014年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • A9001464

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する