이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Pilot Study Of Pregabalin And Prediction Of Treatment Response In Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia

2014년 6월 6일 업데이트: Pfizer

A Phase 4 Multicenter, Open-Label, Pilot Study Of Pregabalin And Prediction Of Treatment Response In Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia

The primary objective is to explore whether sensory symptom cluster analysis is useful for predicting treatment response in Postherpetic Neuralgia.

연구 개요

상태

종료됨

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

The study was stopped on 26 April 2013 due to feasibility issues (low enrollment) not safety. The overall risk-benefit of Lyrica has not changed at all due to termination of this trial. Only 9 of the 150 patients were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

9

단계

  • 4단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

  • 남아프리카
    • Gauteng
      • Pretoria, Gauteng, 남아프리카, 0122
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Western Cape
      • Paarl, Western Cape, 남아프리카, 7626
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • 독일
      • Schwerin, 독일, 19053
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • 미국
    • Florida
      • Leesburg, Florida, 미국, 34748
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, 미국, 40509
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, 미국, 27612
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Jekintown, Pennsylvania, 미국, 19046
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • 오스트리아
      • Wien, 오스트리아, A-1010
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • A-3541
      • Senftenberg, A-3541, 오스트리아
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have pain present for more than 3 months after the healing of the herpes zoster skin rash.
  • At screening (V1) and baseline (V2), subjects must have a score of >=4 on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (1 week recall period).
  • At baseline (V2), at least 4 pain diaries must be completed satisfactorily within the last 7 days and the average pain score must be >=4.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects having other severe pain that may confound assessment or self evaluation of the pain due to PHN.
  • Neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy for Postherpetic Neuralgia
  • Skin conditions in the affected dermatome that could alter sensation.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Pregabalin (300-600 mg/day; 150 mg/day starting dose)
의약품: pregabalin
Pregabalin Capsules (150 mg - 600mg), Dose titration (4 weeks) and fixed dose (2 weeks) for a 6 week treatment period.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change From Baseline in the Daily Pain Diary (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS) Mean Pain Score at the End of the Study (Week 6).
기간: Baseline, Week 6
The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.
Baseline, Week 6

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) at All Visits.
기간: All visits
NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning [superficial] spontaneous pain, pressing [deep] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia [P/D]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100. Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
All visits
Proportion of Phenotypes Within the 30% and 50% Responder Groups at Baseline and Week 6.
기간: Baseline, Week 6
To explore whether sensory symptom cluster analysis is useful for predicting treatment response in paticipants with PHN, identification of the phenotype was initially required of all participants using three different approaches (with or without the baseline PHQ-8, GAD-7 Pain Related Sleep Interference Score Scale, PCS): 1. PainDETECT at baseline, 2. PainPREDICT at baseline, 3. NPSI at baseline. Then for each of the above phenotypes the distribution of the pregabalin responders (using 30% and 50%) were to be compared.
Baseline, Week 6
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 6/Early Termination.
기간: Week 6/Early Termination
PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Week 6/Early Termination
Proportions of Participants With >/=30% and >/=50% Pain Reduction Based on Daily Pain Diary at Baseline and Week 6.
기간: Baseline, Week 6
The daily pain diary consists of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants describe their pain during the previous 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment is performed daily at bedtime on a telephone via interactive voice response system (IVRS). The endpoint mean pain score is defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in the open-label phase. Daily pain IVRS diaries were completed daily at bedtime from Visit 1 (Screening) through Visit 7/Early Termination. Participants were asked to complete their first IVRS daily at bedtime on the morning after Visit 1.
Baseline, Week 6
Proportion of Participants Within Each Phenotype Group as Determined by Sensory Symptom Clustering Using the PainPREDICT, PainDETECT and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory at Baseline and Week 6.
기간: Baseline, Week 6
To explore whether sensory symptom cluster analysis is useful for predicting treatment response in paticipants with PHN, identification of the phenotype was initially required of all participants using three different approaches (with or without the baseline PHQ-8, GAD-7 Pain Related Sleep Interference Score Scale, PCS): 1. PainDETECT at baseline, 2. PainPREDICT at baseline, 3. NPSI at baseline.
Baseline, Week 6
Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) at Baseline and Week 6; Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at Screening, Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6/Early Termination.
기간: Screening, Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6/Early Termination
The PHQ-8 is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The PHQ-8 is a validated subset of the PHQ-9, which comprises the first 8 items of the measure. The GAD-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses anxiety. Participants respond as to how each item applies to them on a 4 point response scale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety.
Screening, Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6/Early Termination
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI sf) at Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6.
기간: Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6
The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) consists of 5 questions. Questions 1, 2, 3, and 4 measure pain on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible).
Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6
Patient Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6.
기간: Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6
The PCS is a 13-item self report instrument and requires a Grade 6 reading level and has been translated into 12 languages. It instructs participants to reflect on past experience of pain and indicate their experience using a 5-point scale. The PCS was designed for research on catastrophizing and pain experience. Catastrophizing is associated with heightened pain and is "an exaggerated negative mental set brought to bear during actual or anticipated painful experience." It is a multidimensional construct compromising elements of rumination, magnification, and helplessness and its factor structure has been replicated. It has a total score and three subscale scores (score range of 0-52).
Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6
Pain NRS Score; 1 Week Recall Period.
기간: 1 Week
The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.
1 Week
Short Form 12v2 Health Survey (SF 12v2) at Visit 2 (Week 0), and Week 6/Early Termination.
기간: Visit 2 (Week 0), and Week 6/Early Termination
The Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12v2) is a self-administered, validated questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health aspects: Physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perception over the past week. Higher scores indicate a better health-related quality of life.
Visit 2 (Week 0), and Week 6/Early Termination
Change From Baseline to End of the Study (Week 6) in the Daily Sleep Interference Diary (NRS) Mean Pain Score.
기간: Baseline, Week 6
The pain-related sleep interference item rating scale is scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-Sleep). It is self-administered by the participant in order to rate how pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Participants are to describe how their pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number on the numeric rating scale.
Baseline, Week 6

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

Pfizer

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

유용한 링크

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2012년 10월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2013년 6월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2013년 6월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2012년 4월 16일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2012년 5월 18일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2012년 5월 22일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)

2014년 7월 8일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2014년 6월 6일

마지막으로 확인됨

2014년 6월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • A9001464

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다