Turning Dysfunction After Stroke: Assessment and Intervention
2020年12月13日 更新者：Pei Jung Liang、Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
Turning Dysfunction After Stroke And Its Association To Trunk Control: Underlying Mechanisms And Training Effects
The study aims to investigate the 1) differences between stroke patients and healthy controls in time, steps, angular velocity, stepping patterns, electromyographic responses during turning, and the association of turning to trunk control and motor function after stroke; 2) the effectiveness of trunk training on turning performance, trunk control and motor function in stroke patients.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
This study has two parts.
The first part is a cross-sectional observatory study.Eligible stroke and healthy subjects are asked their demographic data and assessed for turning performance (stepping patterns and electromyography data of trunk muscles), trunk control (muscle strength, active range of motion, muscle mass and motor control in trunk) and motor function (recovery of extremities and balance function).
The second part is a randomized controlled trial.
Stroke participants are randomly allocated into trunk exercise and control groups.
Trunk exercise group receives trunk exercise including trunk muscles stretching, trunk muscles strengthening, and task-related trunk control training for 30 minutes per session, twice a week for 12 weeks while control group remains their regular activities.
Turning performance, trunk control and motor function are evaluated before and after training session.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
42
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
-
New Taipei City、台湾
- Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
20年～80年 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- age between 20 and 80 years old
- survivors of a single and unilateral stroke with hemiparesis experienced at least 6 months prior to their participation in the study
- able to walk independently over a distance of 10 m without walking aids or orthoses
- able to provide informed consent and follow instructions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- having additional musculoskeletal conditions or comorbid disabilities that could affect the assessment
- having cognitive problems with a Mini-Mental State Examination score less than 24 or aphasia that could prevent subjects from following instructions.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Trunk exercise group
Participants received trunk exercise for 30 minutes per session, twice a week for 12 weeks.
|
Trunk exercise includes trunk muscles stretching, trunk muscles strengthening, and task-related trunk control training for 30 minutes per session, twice a week for 12 weeks.
|
|
介入なし：Control group
Participants remained their regular activities.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in turning duration at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
Turning duration (s) was recorded during turning 360-degree in place using APDM Opal wireless sensors.
Longer duration represents poorer turning performance.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change from Baseline in turning angular velocity at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
Angular velocity (m/s2) was recorded during turning 360-degree in place using APDM Opal wireless sensors.
Slower angular velocity represents instability during turning.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change from Baseline in trunk muscles electromyography during turning at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
Muscle activation patterns (amplitude, % reference voluntary contraction) are observed in bilateral External abdominal oblique (EO) and erector spinae (ES) through an electromyographic analysis.
Greater muscle amplitude represents greater muscle contraction.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in trunk range of motion at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
The trunk range of motion (ROM) was measured using a tape measure in sitting position.
The spinous processes at C7 and S1 served as landmarks for placement of the tape and measurement for trunk flexion and extension ROM.
The length between iliac crest and contralateral acromion of scapula was measured for trunk rotation ROM while the distance between the tip of the middle finger and the floor for trunk lateral flexion ROM.
The difference between tape measures in starting and ending positions was calculated for all trunk movement directions.
Greater value of trunk flexion and rotation but smaller value of trunk extension and lateral flexion represents better trunk ROM.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change from Baseline in trunk muscles strength at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
Trunk flexors, extensors, rotators, and lateral flexors strength were measured using a MicroFET3 dynamometer.
Participants were asked to generate the maximum trunk flexion, extension, rotation bilaterally and lateral flexion bilaterally for a period of 6 seconds each.
Resistance was applied using the dynamometer to obtain the value of each trunk muscle (kg).
Greater value represents greater muscle strength.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change from Baseline in Trunk Impairment Scale at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
Trunk control was assessed by the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) which has good inter-rater reliability with intra-class coefficient 0.85-0.99 and internal consistency with Cronbach's α 0.65-0.89.
The TIS evaluates static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination in a sitting position.
On the static and dynamic sitting balance and coordination subscales the maximal scores that can be attained are 7, 10 and 6 points.
The total score for TIS ranges between 0 for a minimal performance to 23 for a perfect performance.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB) is designed to assess how well an older adult is using sensory inputs when one or more sensory systems are compromised.
The postural sway was measured in 4 sensory conditions through visual and proprioceptive manipulation using APDM Opal wireless sensors.
The greater postural sway represents the poorer balance.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change from Baseline in Berg Balance Scale at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
The Berg balance scale (BBS) is used to objectively determine a participant's ability to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks.
It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function.
The total score is 56.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change from Baseline in Timed Up and Go test at Week 12
時間枠：Baseline and Week 12
|
Function mobility was assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.
Participants were instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, and walk back to the chair sit down.
Time to complete the task was recorded.
The more time taken is representative of the lower level of functional mobility.
|
Baseline and Week 12
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Pei-Jung Liang、Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2020年7月13日
一次修了 (実際)
2020年10月31日
研究の完了 (実際)
2020年10月31日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2020年12月8日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2020年12月13日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2020年12月16日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2020年12月16日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2020年12月13日
最終確認日
2020年12月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。