Nurse Practitioner Led Implementation of Team Huddles in Long-Term Care Homes
2022年5月18日 更新者：Katherine McGilton、Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Nurse Practitioner Led Implementation of Team Huddles in Long-Term Care Homes During COVID-19
A pre-experimental design to conduct a process evaluation and to compare the outcomes after implementing team huddles for the intervention and control groups.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Staff working in long-term care (LTC) homes during COVID-19 frequently reported lack of communication, collaboration, and teamwork, all of which are associated with staff dissatisfaction, health concerns, perceived of lack of support and moral distress.
The purpose of this study was to introduced regular huddles, led by a Nurse Practitioner, to support LTC staff during COVID-19.
The objectives were to evaluate the process of huddle implementation and to examine differences between staff attending and not attending the huddles on outcomes of moral distress, job satisfaction, perceived support from the Nurse Practitioner, and health and mental health.
Furthermore, we hypothesize that regular huddles can lead to improvements in resident-centred care and resident outcomes.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
42
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Ontario
-
Kitchener、Ontario、カナダ、N2A 1Y5
- Long-Term Care Home
-
Sarnia、Ontario、カナダ
- Long-Term Care Home
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- All staff working at the LTC home
- All residents living in the home between January and December 2021
Exclusion Criteria:
- N/A
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：他の
- 割り当て：非ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Huddle attendees
Participants in this arm participated in huddles
|
Brief multidisciplinary meeting occurring twice a week for staff working at a LTC home led by a Nurse Practitioner.
Huddles focused on discussing resident-care and staff-wellbeing.
|
|
介入なし：Huddle non-attendees
Participants in this arm did not participate in huddles
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall morals distress and situations associated with COVID-19 in LTC settings contributing to moral distress were measured in the intervention and control arms using the Moral Distress in Dementia Care Instrument (Iaboni et al., 2021).
時間枠：20 weeks
|
Moral Distress in Dementia Care is a ten-item checklist, where respondents are asked to rate moral distress associated with each item on a 5-point scale ranging from none (1) to an extremely large amount (5).
Higher scores represent more moral distress.
|
20 weeks
|
|
Overall job satisfaction with current role was measured in the intervention and control arms using a single question asking, "How satisfied are you overall with your current job in the LTC home?" (Dolbier et al., 2005)
時間枠：20 weeks
|
The single-item question was high reliability and validity (Dolbier et al., 2005) and has been used in previous studies in LTC homes (Schwendimann et al., 2016).
Respondents rate job satisfaction on a 4-point scale ranging from strongly dissatisfied (1) to strongly satisfied (4), where higher scores indicate more satisfaction.
|
20 weeks
|
|
Overall health was measured in the intervention and control arms using a single question from Statistics Canada (2022) asking, "In general, how would you say your health is?"
時間枠：20 weeks
|
Respondents rate their health on a 5-point scale ranging from poor (0) to excellent (4), where higher scores indicate better health.
|
20 weeks
|
|
Mental health was measured in the intervention and control arms using a single question from Statistics Canada (2022) asking, "In general, how would you say your mental health is?"
時間枠：20 weeks
|
Respondents rate their mental health on a 5-point scale ranging from poor (0) to excellent (4), where higher scores indicate better mental health.
|
20 weeks
|
|
Perceived support from the nurse practitioner leading the huddles was measured in the intervention and control arms, assessed using the Supportive Supervisory Scale (McGilton 2010).
時間枠：20 weeks
|
The 5-item scale asks respondents to rate their perception of support from the nurse practitioner in 5 situations on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0) to always (5), where higher scores indicate more perceived support.
|
20 weeks
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
The duration of each huddle in minutes was recorded by the nurse practitioner using the Huddle Observation Tool (HOT) (Edbrooke-Childs et al., 2018) as part of process evaluation.
時間枠：15 weeks
|
Average and range of huddle duration were measured.
|
15 weeks
|
|
The attendance of different staff categories (i.e. personal support worker, registered practical nurse) at each huddle was recorded by the nurse practitioner using HOT (Edbrooke-Childs et al., 2018) as part of process evaluation.
時間枠：15 weeks
|
Attendance of categories of staff at huddles was summarized as percentage of total huddles attended.
|
15 weeks
|
|
The frequency of delivery of huddles by the nurse practitioner was self-reported using HOT (Edbrooke-Childs et al., 2018) as part of process evaluation.
時間枠：15 weeks
|
Data was summarized as total number of huddles delivered and number of huddles delivered per week.
|
15 weeks
|
|
Adherence to huddle structure was self-reported by the nurse practitioner using HOT (Edbrooke-Childs et al., 2018) as part of process evaluation.
時間枠：15 weeks
|
Data included huddle topic and aim, sharing of a positive event, maintaining a collaborative culture, and creation of a risk management plan and was summarized as number of huddles adhering to the structure.
|
15 weeks
|
|
Depressive symptoms of residents residing on the intervention and control units will be measured with the Depression Rating Scale before and after implementation of huddles.
時間枠：1 year
|
This is a quality indicator obtained from the Resident Assessment Instrument - Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0.
Depression Rating Scale is based on the following items: negative statements (E1a), persistent anger (E1d), expression of unrealistic fears (E1f), repetitive health complaints (E1h), repetitive anxious complaints (E1ii), sad, pained, worried facial expression (E1l), crying, tearfulness (E1m).
The score ranges from 0 to 14, where a score of 3 or more may indicate a potential or actual problem with depression.
|
1 year
|
|
Aggression of residents residing on the intervention and control units will be measured with the Aggressive Behaviour Scale before and after implementation of huddles.
時間枠：1 year
|
This is a quality indicator obtained from the RAI-MDS 2.0.
Aggressive Behaviour Scale is based on the following items: verbally abusive (E4b), physically abusive (E4c), socially inappropriate/disruptive behaviour (E4d), resists care (E4e).
Scores range from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate higher levels of aggressive behaviour.
|
1 year
|
|
The cognitive status of residents on the intervention and control units will be measured with the Cognitive Performance Scale before and after implementation of huddles.
時間枠：1 year
|
This is a quality indicator obtained from the RAI-MDS 2.0.
Cognitive Performance Scale is based on the following items: comatose (B1), short-term memory (B2a), cognition skills for daily decision-making (B4), expressive communication (C4), eating (G1hA).
The sores range from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe cognitive impairment.
|
1 year
|
|
Changes in health, end-stage disease, and signs and symptoms of residents on the intervention and control units will be measured using the CHESS scale before and after implementation of huddles.
時間枠：1 year
|
This is a quality indicator obtained from the RAI-MDS 2.0.
CHESS is based on the following items: decline in cognition (B6), decline in ADL (G9), dehydration (J1c), edema (J1g), shortness of breath (J1l), vomiting (J1o), end-stage disease (J5c), weight loss (K3a), leaving food uneaten (K4c).
The score ranges from 0 to 5, where higher scores indicate higher levels of medical complexity and are associated with adverse outcomes.
|
1 year
|
|
Changes in social engagement of residents on the intervention and control units will be measured with the Index of Social Engagement (ISE) before and after implementation of huddles.
時間枠：1 year
|
This is a quality indicator obtained from the RAI-MDS 2.0.
ISE is based on the following items: at ease interacting with others (F1a), at ease doing planned or structured activities (F1b), at ease doing self-initiated activities (F1c), establishes own goals (F1d), pursues involvement in the life of the facility (F1e), accepts invitations into most group activities (F1f).
The scores range from 0-6, where higher scores indicate higher levels of social engagement.
|
1 year
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
協力者
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Katherine S McGilton、KITE Research Institute - Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Dolbier CL, Webster JA, McCalister KT, Mallon MW, Steinhardt MA. Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. Am J Health Promot. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(3):194-8. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.3.194.
- Schwendimann R, Dhaini S, Ausserhofer D, Engberg S, Zuniga F. Factors associated with high job satisfaction among care workers in Swiss nursing homes - a cross sectional survey study. BMC Nurs. 2016 Jun 6;15:37. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0160-8. eCollection 2016.
- McGilton KS. Development and psychometric testing of the Supportive Supervisory Scale. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Jun;42(2):223-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01323.x.
- Iaboni A, Quirt H, Engell K, Kirkham J, Stewart S, Grigorovich A, Kontos P, McMurray J, Levy A, Bingham K, Rodrigues K, Astell A, Flint AJ, Maxwell C. Barriers and facilitators to person-centred infection prevention and control: results of a survey about the Dementia Isolation Toolkit. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 25;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02759-4.
- Edbrooke-Childs J, Hayes J, Sharples E, Gondek D, Stapley E, Sevdalis N, Lachman P, Deighton J. Development of the Huddle Observation Tool for structured case management discussions to improve situation awareness on inpatient clinical wards. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 May;27(5):365-372. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006513. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2021年5月14日
一次修了 (実際)
2021年11月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
2021年11月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2022年5月13日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2022年5月18日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2022年5月24日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2022年5月24日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2022年5月18日
最終確認日
2022年5月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 20-6298
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
IPD プランの説明
No IPD will be shared with other researchers.
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。