このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Feasibility of the Glenrose Grocery Game for Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Older Inpatients

2026年5月7日 更新者:University of Alberta

The Effects of Playing the Glenrose Grocery Game on the Specific Mental Functions Andfunctioning in Inpatient Older Adults: a Feasibility Study

Older adults could benefit from computer serious games as a strategy for improving not only their cognitive functions but also their functioning and performance in daily activities, which are often compromised with age. A computer serious game is one designed for a primary purpose other than pure entertainment. Few computer games had been developed to emulate instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), such as money management (e.g., shopping or paying bills). To fill this gap, occupational therapists at the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital (GRH) developed the Glenrose Grocery Game (GGG).

At the time, the game had not yet been tested. Thus, the purpose of this feasibility study was to explore whether playing the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at the GRH had an effect on specific mental functions (memory and attention), occupational performance in money management tasks, and satisfaction with occupational performance in older adults.

In this study, we compared the outcomes of 7 participants who played the GGG (intervention group) with those of 8 different participants who received the GRH standard of care (control group). Data analysis is being conducted. The results of the study:

Provided clinicians with evidence for implementing the GGG in interventions, which in turn may benefit inpatient clients at the GRH;

Informed stakeholders' decisions about clients' safe discharge and transition to home and community; and

Supported researchers in designing a larger and more robust study.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Occupational therapists at the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital (GRH) developed the Glenrose Grocery Game (GGG)-a serious game designed to simulate shopping, meal planning, and budgeting in a virtual environment. However, the GGG had not yet been tested for its impact on cognitive and occupational outcomes.

The purpose of this feasibility study was to explore the implementation and effects of the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at GRH, assessing its impact on specific mental functions, occupational performance, and satisfaction with performance in older adults. The study also aimed to estimate the parameters needed to design a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Research Questions

Was the designed protocol feasible for conducting a future definitive RCT?

Did playing the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at GRH affect mental functions, occupational performance, and satisfaction in older adults, compared to standard care?

How engaged were older adults while playing the GGG?

Methods Design A pretest-posttest control group design was used. The experimental group received sessions with the GGG, while the control group received standard care (i.e., compensatory strategies). The study followed the CONSORT guidelines for randomized pilot studies (Eldridge et al., 2016).

Participants

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 50 or older

With or without cognitive impairment (MOCA ≥19)

Functional vision and hearing (with or without aids)

Functional upper extremity use

Required no more than one-person assist for mobility

Exclusion Criteria:

Diagnosed with influenza or a virus affecting cognitive performance

Unable to count, speak, or follow simple English instructions

Sample Size Based on power analysis (α = 0.05, power = 0.8, effect size = 1.2), a minimum of 32 participants was required. We aimed to recruit 16 participants per group to account for a 25% dropout rate.

Sampling and Allocation Stratified permuted block randomization was used, with stratification based on MOCA scores. Participants with MOCA scores between 19-24 were categorized as having moderate cognitive impairment; those with scores of 25-30 were considered to have mild/no impairment. Allocation was blinded to research staff administering and evaluating the intervention.

Recruitment Protocol OTs at GRH inpatient units identified eligible participants. Informed consent (or assent via substitute decision-makers) was obtained. Allocation and coding were conducted by the PI (AMRR), and group assignment remained blinded to those delivering and evaluating the intervention.

Independent Variable

GGG Intervention: Participants played the GGG, completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format. Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.

Standard Care: Included cognitive assessment, education, and compensatory strategies (e.g., journaling, memory logs). Interventions were tailored to comprehension level and included caregiver involvement when needed.

Dependent Variables

Specific Mental Functions:

Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B

Walking and Remembering Test (WART)

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)

Occupational Performance:

Objective: PASS Task H8 (Money Management: Shopping)

Subjective: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

Engagement:

8-point Likert engagement scale developed in a prior study (Ríos Rincón et al., 2017)

All tools have strong metric properties and are suitable for use with older adults.

Data Collection The experimental group received GGG sessions in a dedicated room at GRH. Engagement was assessed post-session. All participants completed pretest and posttest assessments, taking ~80 minutes total. Blinded evaluators (RA 2) conducted assessments; a second rater (RA 3) scored at least 25% of measures to ensure reliability.

Data Analysis Data are currently being analyzed using SPSS under intention-to-treat principles. Descriptive statistics are being used to characterize the groups at pretest. Due to the small sample size, non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U) are being used for within- and between-group comparisons for MOCA, TMT, WART, PASS, and COPM scores. Clinical significance in COPM scores is being evaluated using the two-point threshold (Law et al., 1998). Engagement data are being analyzed descriptively.

Potential Impact Findings from this study will provide clinicians with preliminary evidence regarding the GGG's impact on cognition, occupational performance, and engagement in older adults. If results are favorable, they will support the implementation of the GGG as a rehabilitation tool at GRH, benefiting inpatient clients. Insights will also help guide discharge planning and caregiver support and inform the design of a future, larger-scale RCT.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

15

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton、Alberta、カナダ、T6G 2G4
        • Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults aged 50 years and older
  • With and without some level of cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) ≥19) (Nasreddine, Phillips, & Chertkow, 2011).
  • Have a level of awareness to be able to interact with the game platform.
  • Have functional vision and hearing with or without aides (glasses/hearing aides) to be able to interact with the game platform.
  • Have functional upper extremity function to be able to interact with the game.
  • Maximum mobility limitation of 1 person assist with mobility aid

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults who have Infuenza or another virus virus that affect their performance
  • Unable to count, speak (name objects and say numbers) or comprehend simple instructions in English

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:Standard of care for cognitive impairment
Compensatory strategy consists in recommendations made by Occupational Therapists to the client and caregivers for his/her safety while performing instrumental activities of daily living.
Compensatory strategies
実験的:Experimental: Glenrose Grocery Game sessions
Participants played the GGG, completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format. Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.
Participants played the the Glenrose Grocery Game (a serious game), completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format. Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The MOCA is a widely used screening tool for detecting mild cognitive impairment. It assesses several cognitive domains, including memory, attention, language, visuospatial skills, and executive function. A score of 26 or above is considered normal.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The TMT assesses visual attention, processing speed, mental flexibility, and executive function. Part A involves connecting numbered circles in sequence, while Part B alternates between numbers and letters (e.g., 1-A-2-B), requiring set-shifting ability.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Walking and Remembering Test (WART)
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The WART is a dual-task assessment that evaluates divided attention and working memory. Participants walk a defined path while recalling and repeating a sequence of numbers, simulating real-world multitasking challenges.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Engagement scale
時間枠:After each session with the game from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
This is an 8-item scale for engagement
After each session with the game from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Objective Measure - PASS Task H8 (Money Management: Shopping)
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
This task from the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS) evaluates a person's ability to complete a simulated shopping task, focusing on problem-solving, planning, and safety in money management.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
時間枠:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The COPM is a client-centered tool that captures self-perceived performance and satisfaction with daily activities. Clients identify priority tasks, then rate their performance and satisfaction on a 10-point scale.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2019年6月6日

一次修了 (実際)

2020年3月12日

研究の完了 (実際)

2020年3月12日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2025年8月6日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年5月7日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月13日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月13日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年5月7日

最終確認日

2026年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する