Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Feasibility of the Glenrose Grocery Game for Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Older Inpatients

torstai 7. toukokuuta 2026 päivittänyt: University of Alberta

The Effects of Playing the Glenrose Grocery Game on the Specific Mental Functions Andfunctioning in Inpatient Older Adults: a Feasibility Study

Older adults could benefit from computer serious games as a strategy for improving not only their cognitive functions but also their functioning and performance in daily activities, which are often compromised with age. A computer serious game is one designed for a primary purpose other than pure entertainment. Few computer games had been developed to emulate instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), such as money management (e.g., shopping or paying bills). To fill this gap, occupational therapists at the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital (GRH) developed the Glenrose Grocery Game (GGG).

At the time, the game had not yet been tested. Thus, the purpose of this feasibility study was to explore whether playing the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at the GRH had an effect on specific mental functions (memory and attention), occupational performance in money management tasks, and satisfaction with occupational performance in older adults.

In this study, we compared the outcomes of 7 participants who played the GGG (intervention group) with those of 8 different participants who received the GRH standard of care (control group). Data analysis is being conducted. The results of the study:

Provided clinicians with evidence for implementing the GGG in interventions, which in turn may benefit inpatient clients at the GRH;

Informed stakeholders' decisions about clients' safe discharge and transition to home and community; and

Supported researchers in designing a larger and more robust study.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus

Occupational therapists at the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital (GRH) developed the Glenrose Grocery Game (GGG)-a serious game designed to simulate shopping, meal planning, and budgeting in a virtual environment. However, the GGG had not yet been tested for its impact on cognitive and occupational outcomes.

The purpose of this feasibility study was to explore the implementation and effects of the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at GRH, assessing its impact on specific mental functions, occupational performance, and satisfaction with performance in older adults. The study also aimed to estimate the parameters needed to design a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Research Questions

Was the designed protocol feasible for conducting a future definitive RCT?

Did playing the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at GRH affect mental functions, occupational performance, and satisfaction in older adults, compared to standard care?

How engaged were older adults while playing the GGG?

Methods Design A pretest-posttest control group design was used. The experimental group received sessions with the GGG, while the control group received standard care (i.e., compensatory strategies). The study followed the CONSORT guidelines for randomized pilot studies (Eldridge et al., 2016).

Participants

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 50 or older

With or without cognitive impairment (MOCA ≥19)

Functional vision and hearing (with or without aids)

Functional upper extremity use

Required no more than one-person assist for mobility

Exclusion Criteria:

Diagnosed with influenza or a virus affecting cognitive performance

Unable to count, speak, or follow simple English instructions

Sample Size Based on power analysis (α = 0.05, power = 0.8, effect size = 1.2), a minimum of 32 participants was required. We aimed to recruit 16 participants per group to account for a 25% dropout rate.

Sampling and Allocation Stratified permuted block randomization was used, with stratification based on MOCA scores. Participants with MOCA scores between 19-24 were categorized as having moderate cognitive impairment; those with scores of 25-30 were considered to have mild/no impairment. Allocation was blinded to research staff administering and evaluating the intervention.

Recruitment Protocol OTs at GRH inpatient units identified eligible participants. Informed consent (or assent via substitute decision-makers) was obtained. Allocation and coding were conducted by the PI (AMRR), and group assignment remained blinded to those delivering and evaluating the intervention.

Independent Variable

GGG Intervention: Participants played the GGG, completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format. Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.

Standard Care: Included cognitive assessment, education, and compensatory strategies (e.g., journaling, memory logs). Interventions were tailored to comprehension level and included caregiver involvement when needed.

Dependent Variables

Specific Mental Functions:

Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B

Walking and Remembering Test (WART)

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)

Occupational Performance:

Objective: PASS Task H8 (Money Management: Shopping)

Subjective: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

Engagement:

8-point Likert engagement scale developed in a prior study (Ríos Rincón et al., 2017)

All tools have strong metric properties and are suitable for use with older adults.

Data Collection The experimental group received GGG sessions in a dedicated room at GRH. Engagement was assessed post-session. All participants completed pretest and posttest assessments, taking ~80 minutes total. Blinded evaluators (RA 2) conducted assessments; a second rater (RA 3) scored at least 25% of measures to ensure reliability.

Data Analysis Data are currently being analyzed using SPSS under intention-to-treat principles. Descriptive statistics are being used to characterize the groups at pretest. Due to the small sample size, non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U) are being used for within- and between-group comparisons for MOCA, TMT, WART, PASS, and COPM scores. Clinical significance in COPM scores is being evaluated using the two-point threshold (Law et al., 1998). Engagement data are being analyzed descriptively.

Potential Impact Findings from this study will provide clinicians with preliminary evidence regarding the GGG's impact on cognition, occupational performance, and engagement in older adults. If results are favorable, they will support the implementation of the GGG as a rehabilitation tool at GRH, benefiting inpatient clients. Insights will also help guide discharge planning and caregiver support and inform the design of a future, larger-scale RCT.

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)

15

Vaihe

  • Ei sovellettavissa

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskelupaikat

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Kanada, T6G 2G4
        • Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

  • Aikuinen
  • Vanhempi Aikuinen

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Joo

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults aged 50 years and older
  • With and without some level of cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) ≥19) (Nasreddine, Phillips, & Chertkow, 2011).
  • Have a level of awareness to be able to interact with the game platform.
  • Have functional vision and hearing with or without aides (glasses/hearing aides) to be able to interact with the game platform.
  • Have functional upper extremity function to be able to interact with the game.
  • Maximum mobility limitation of 1 person assist with mobility aid

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults who have Infuenza or another virus virus that affect their performance
  • Unable to count, speak (name objects and say numbers) or comprehend simple instructions in English

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Hoito
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Active Comparator: Standard of care for cognitive impairment
Compensatory strategy consists in recommendations made by Occupational Therapists to the client and caregivers for his/her safety while performing instrumental activities of daily living.
Compensatory strategies
Kokeellinen: Experimental: Glenrose Grocery Game sessions
Participants played the GGG, completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format. Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.
Participants played the the Glenrose Grocery Game (a serious game), completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format. Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The MOCA is a widely used screening tool for detecting mild cognitive impairment. It assesses several cognitive domains, including memory, attention, language, visuospatial skills, and executive function. A score of 26 or above is considered normal.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The TMT assesses visual attention, processing speed, mental flexibility, and executive function. Part A involves connecting numbered circles in sequence, while Part B alternates between numbers and letters (e.g., 1-A-2-B), requiring set-shifting ability.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Walking and Remembering Test (WART)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The WART is a dual-task assessment that evaluates divided attention and working memory. Participants walk a defined path while recalling and repeating a sequence of numbers, simulating real-world multitasking challenges.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Engagement scale
Aikaikkuna: After each session with the game from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
This is an 8-item scale for engagement
After each session with the game from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Objective Measure - PASS Task H8 (Money Management: Shopping)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
This task from the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS) evaluates a person's ability to complete a simulated shopping task, focusing on problem-solving, planning, and safety in money management.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The COPM is a client-centered tool that captures self-perceived performance and satisfaction with daily activities. Clients identify priority tasks, then rate their performance and satisfaction on a 10-point scale.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Yhteistyökumppanit

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)

Torstai 6. kesäkuuta 2019

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Torstai 12. maaliskuuta 2020

Opintojen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Torstai 12. maaliskuuta 2020

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Keskiviikko 6. elokuuta 2025

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Torstai 7. toukokuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)

Keskiviikko 13. toukokuuta 2026

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Keskiviikko 13. toukokuuta 2026

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Torstai 7. toukokuuta 2026

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Perjantai 1. toukokuuta 2026

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

EI

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Ei

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa