Feasibility of the Glenrose Grocery Game for Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in Older Inpatients
The Effects of Playing the Glenrose Grocery Game on the Specific Mental Functions Andfunctioning in Inpatient Older Adults: a Feasibility Study
Older adults could benefit from computer serious games as a strategy for improving not only their cognitive functions but also their functioning and performance in daily activities, which are often compromised with age. A computer serious game is one designed for a primary purpose other than pure entertainment. Few computer games had been developed to emulate instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), such as money management (e.g., shopping or paying bills). To fill this gap, occupational therapists at the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital (GRH) developed the Glenrose Grocery Game (GGG).
At the time, the game had not yet been tested. Thus, the purpose of this feasibility study was to explore whether playing the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at the GRH had an effect on specific mental functions (memory and attention), occupational performance in money management tasks, and satisfaction with occupational performance in older adults.
In this study, we compared the outcomes of 7 participants who played the GGG (intervention group) with those of 8 different participants who received the GRH standard of care (control group). Data analysis is being conducted. The results of the study:
Provided clinicians with evidence for implementing the GGG in interventions, which in turn may benefit inpatient clients at the GRH;
Informed stakeholders' decisions about clients' safe discharge and transition to home and community; and
Supported researchers in designing a larger and more robust study.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Occupational therapists at the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital (GRH) developed the Glenrose Grocery Game (GGG)-a serious game designed to simulate shopping, meal planning, and budgeting in a virtual environment. However, the GGG had not yet been tested for its impact on cognitive and occupational outcomes.
The purpose of this feasibility study was to explore the implementation and effects of the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at GRH, assessing its impact on specific mental functions, occupational performance, and satisfaction with performance in older adults. The study also aimed to estimate the parameters needed to design a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Research Questions
Was the designed protocol feasible for conducting a future definitive RCT?
Did playing the GGG as part of the rehabilitation program at GRH affect mental functions, occupational performance, and satisfaction in older adults, compared to standard care?
How engaged were older adults while playing the GGG?
Methods Design A pretest-posttest control group design was used. The experimental group received sessions with the GGG, while the control group received standard care (i.e., compensatory strategies). The study followed the CONSORT guidelines for randomized pilot studies (Eldridge et al., 2016).
Participants
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults aged 50 or older
With or without cognitive impairment (MOCA ≥19)
Functional vision and hearing (with or without aids)
Functional upper extremity use
Required no more than one-person assist for mobility
Exclusion Criteria:
Diagnosed with influenza or a virus affecting cognitive performance
Unable to count, speak, or follow simple English instructions
Sample Size Based on power analysis (α = 0.05, power = 0.8, effect size = 1.2), a minimum of 32 participants was required. We aimed to recruit 16 participants per group to account for a 25% dropout rate.
Sampling and Allocation Stratified permuted block randomization was used, with stratification based on MOCA scores. Participants with MOCA scores between 19-24 were categorized as having moderate cognitive impairment; those with scores of 25-30 were considered to have mild/no impairment. Allocation was blinded to research staff administering and evaluating the intervention.
Recruitment Protocol OTs at GRH inpatient units identified eligible participants. Informed consent (or assent via substitute decision-makers) was obtained. Allocation and coding were conducted by the PI (AMRR), and group assignment remained blinded to those delivering and evaluating the intervention.
Independent Variable
GGG Intervention: Participants played the GGG, completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format. Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.
Standard Care: Included cognitive assessment, education, and compensatory strategies (e.g., journaling, memory logs). Interventions were tailored to comprehension level and included caregiver involvement when needed.
Dependent Variables
Specific Mental Functions:
Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B
Walking and Remembering Test (WART)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Occupational Performance:
Objective: PASS Task H8 (Money Management: Shopping)
Subjective: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Engagement:
8-point Likert engagement scale developed in a prior study (Ríos Rincón et al., 2017)
All tools have strong metric properties and are suitable for use with older adults.
Data Collection The experimental group received GGG sessions in a dedicated room at GRH. Engagement was assessed post-session. All participants completed pretest and posttest assessments, taking ~80 minutes total. Blinded evaluators (RA 2) conducted assessments; a second rater (RA 3) scored at least 25% of measures to ensure reliability.
Data Analysis Data are currently being analyzed using SPSS under intention-to-treat principles. Descriptive statistics are being used to characterize the groups at pretest. Due to the small sample size, non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U) are being used for within- and between-group comparisons for MOCA, TMT, WART, PASS, and COPM scores. Clinical significance in COPM scores is being evaluated using the two-point threshold (Law et al., 1998). Engagement data are being analyzed descriptively.
Potential Impact Findings from this study will provide clinicians with preliminary evidence regarding the GGG's impact on cognition, occupational performance, and engagement in older adults. If results are favorable, they will support the implementation of the GGG as a rehabilitation tool at GRH, benefiting inpatient clients. Insights will also help guide discharge planning and caregiver support and inform the design of a future, larger-scale RCT.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G4
- Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older adults aged 50 years and older
- With and without some level of cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) ≥19) (Nasreddine, Phillips, & Chertkow, 2011).
- Have a level of awareness to be able to interact with the game platform.
- Have functional vision and hearing with or without aides (glasses/hearing aides) to be able to interact with the game platform.
- Have functional upper extremity function to be able to interact with the game.
- Maximum mobility limitation of 1 person assist with mobility aid
Exclusion Criteria:
- Older adults who have Infuenza or another virus virus that affect their performance
- Unable to count, speak (name objects and say numbers) or comprehend simple instructions in English
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Comparateur actif: Standard of care for cognitive impairment
Compensatory strategy consists in recommendations made by Occupational Therapists to the client and caregivers for his/her safety while performing instrumental activities of daily living.
|
Compensatory strategies
|
|
Expérimental: Experimental: Glenrose Grocery Game sessions
Participants played the GGG, completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format.
Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.
|
Participants played the the Glenrose Grocery Game (a serious game), completing meal planning and grocery shopping tasks in a gamified format.
Sessions (8 × 30 minutes over 4 weeks) were delivered by trained RAs using tablets or computers.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Délai: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
The MOCA is a widely used screening tool for detecting mild cognitive impairment.
It assesses several cognitive domains, including memory, attention, language, visuospatial skills, and executive function.
A score of 26 or above is considered normal.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
|
Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B
Délai: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
The TMT assesses visual attention, processing speed, mental flexibility, and executive function.
Part A involves connecting numbered circles in sequence, while Part B alternates between numbers and letters (e.g., 1-A-2-B), requiring set-shifting ability.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
|
Walking and Remembering Test (WART)
Délai: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
The WART is a dual-task assessment that evaluates divided attention and working memory.
Participants walk a defined path while recalling and repeating a sequence of numbers, simulating real-world multitasking challenges.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Engagement scale
Délai: After each session with the game from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
This is an 8-item scale for engagement
|
After each session with the game from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
|
Objective Measure - PASS Task H8 (Money Management: Shopping)
Délai: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
This task from the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS) evaluates a person's ability to complete a simulated shopping task, focusing on problem-solving, planning, and safety in money management.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
|
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Délai: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
The COPM is a client-centered tool that captures self-perceived performance and satisfaction with daily activities.
Clients identify priority tasks, then rate their performance and satisfaction on a 10-point scale.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- Pro00087258
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .