Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (LAP-OPEN)
Radical Laparoscopic-assisted Hysterectomy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Comparative Study
The study aims to compare laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy with open radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IA1, IA2, and IB1 cervical cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned into two equal groups: laparoscopic surgery and open surgery. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection.
Perioperative outcomes were evaluated, including operative time, blood loss, complications, and hospital stay, as well as long-term oncological outcomes such as recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. Patients were followed for up to three years postoperatively. The findings of this study aim to assess the safety, feasibility, and clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted surgery compared with the conventional open approach in the management of early-stage cervical cancer.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Cervical cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Radical hysterectomy is the standard surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. Traditionally, this procedure has been performed through an open abdominal approach; however, minimally invasive techniques, including laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy, have gained increasing attention due to their potential advantages in reducing surgical trauma and improving perioperative recovery.
This study was conducted to compare the clinical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IA1, IA2, and IB1 cervical cancer were included. Participants were admitted to Zagazig University Hospitals between March 2021 and January 2024.
Eligible patients were randomly assigned into two groups: a laparoscopic surgery group and an open surgery group. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection. In the laparoscopic group, vaginal stump closure was performed using an endoscopic stapler, whereas in the open group, closure was performed using conventional surgical techniques.
Primary outcomes included perioperative parameters such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, complications, hospital stay, and time to removal of urinary catheter and drainage tube. Secondary outcomes included long-term oncological outcomes such as recurrence rate, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. Patients were followed for up to three years postoperatively.
The study aimed to determine whether laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy provides comparable safety and oncological outcomes to open surgery while offering potential advantages in perioperative recovery. This study was registered retrospectively, as patient enrollment had been completed prior to trial registration, in accordance with journal requirements and to ensure transparency in reporting.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Sharqia Province
-
Zagazig、Sharqia Province、エジプト
- Zagazig University Hospitals
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- FIGO stage IA1, IA2, IB1
- patients with a tumor size < 2 cm by MRI or pathological assessment after conization
- tumours with histopathological subtypes: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and adeno-squamous carcinoma (
- patients with adequate; hematopoietic, renal and liver functions:
- patients with BMI < 35 (
- patients with age range 38 - 65 years old.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with mental, heart, bladder, liver, or kidney illness
- patients who had received pre-operative chemotherapy or radiotherapy pregnant patients
- patients with incomplete data or lost follow-up
- patients with radiological evidence of invasion of the outer 1/3 of the cervical stroma or the lower uterine segment.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy
In this study, participants underwent radical hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy and lymph node dissection using a laparoscopic approach, and vaginal stump closure using an endoscopic stapler was performed.
|
In this procedure, a minimally invasive laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy is performed, including dissection of the pelvic lymph nodes and closure of the vaginal stump with an endoscopic stapler.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Open Radical Hysterectomy
Under conventional surgical techniques in this group , participants underwent open abdominal radical hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy and dissection of pelvic lymph nodes.
|
A standard open abdominal radical hysterectomy includes dissection of the pelvic lymph nodes and the closure of the vaginal stump.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Operative Time
時間枠：Intraoperative period (day of surgery)
|
The surgery duration will be measured in minutes from skin incision to closure.
|
Intraoperative period (day of surgery)
|
|
Intraoperative Blood Loss volume
時間枠：Intraoperative period
|
Assessment of volume of intraoperative blood loss (mL): Estimated blood loss volume measured in millilitres during surgery.
|
Intraoperative period
|
|
Length of Hospital Stay
時間枠：Up to 30 days post-surgery
|
Duration of hospital stay measured in days from surgery to discharge
|
Up to 30 days post-surgery
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Recurrence Rate
時間枠：Up to 3 years postoperatively
|
Assessment of cancer recurrence following surgical intervention during the follow-up period.
|
Up to 3 years postoperatively
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- スタディチェア：Ola A Harb, Professor、Zagazig University
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- LAPvsOPEN-RH-Study
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。