Simulation-based Training for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
Simulation-based Training for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block Performance: a Randomized Non-inferiority Study Comparing Direct Synchronous Feedback With Remote Asynchronous Feedback
The goal of this study is to evaluate whether remote asynchronous feedback is non-inferior to direct synchronous feedback during simulation-based training for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block performance. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does asynchronous feedback achieve technical skill acquisition outcomes comparable to direct synchronous feedback? Can asynchronous feedback optimize teaching resources without compromising training quality?
Researchers will compare two feedback modalities within a simulation-based training program for deliberate practice of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block techniques.
Participants will:
Receive training with either direct synchronous feedback or remote asynchronous feedback Perform simulation-based deliberate practice sessions Be assessed using validated instruments for technical skill performance
調査の概要
詳細な説明
For the use of the simulation program based on the implementation of a continuous sciatic popliteal nerve block. To achieve this, a simulation program developed by researchers from the School of Medicine of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile will be used for residents from the Emergency Medicine and Critical Care specialty program.
Following approval by the institutional ethics committee, the scenario for 50 students will be prepared. The procedure room will include all the equipment required for performing the intervention, consisting of a video explaining the technique. The study will assess:
(i) Fundamentals and use of echography. (ii) Knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology. (iii) Development of dexterity: ability to perform the procedure correctly.
The students will receive a one-hour lecture on the procedure. This assessment will consist of performing a sciatic popliteal nerve block on a simulated clinical scenario. An evaluator blinded to the study objectives will assess participants using a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a checklist. Additionally, a third evaluator will use the GRS and the checklist remotely (asynchronous feedback).
After the evaluations, the simulation room will remain open throughout the week for students to perform up to five practice sessions. The number of movements and total procedure time will be recorded during each assessment. Students will also complete a satisfaction questionnaire and a final written test after the simulation activity and before the final assessment.
Once the previous evaluation is completed, residents may begin their training.
Subsequently, residents will attend simulation sessions specifically designed to practice the sciatic popliteal nerve block under the guidance of an instructor. Sessions will last 2 hours. Each resident will complete 2 sessions, each separated by 1 week. During the first session, the instructor will explain and supervise correct use of the ultrasound equipment. During the second session, the resident will perform the entire procedure independently. The resident's performance will be recorded and later evaluated through an assessment platform.
One week after training completion, residents will undergo a final assessment using the same tools. The duration of the simulation-based sciatic popliteal nerve block procedure will be recorded. Total procedure time and the number of movements performed during the procedure will also be documented. Additionally, the procedure will be video recorded.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Santiago Metropolitan
-
Santiago、Santiago Metropolitan、チリ、7700950
- 募集
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
-
コンタクト:
- Marcia A Corvetto, Associate professor
- 電話番号:56997423370
- メール:marciacorvetto@gmail.com
-
コンタクト:
- Pablo Miranda, Assistant professor
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medicine students
Exclusion Criteria:
- No exclusion Criteria
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:他の
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Synchronous direct feedback (SYNC)
The control group practiced with synchronous direct feedback (SYNC).
The SYNC group attended the simulation laboratory for practice sessions.
Residents were scheduled to practice with the instructor in a one-to-one ses- sion.
The instructor was present during all the sessions and gave instructions and feedback in real time throughout all sessions (traditional face-to-face feedback modality).
|
The control group practiced with SYNC.
The SYNC group attended the simulation laboratory for practice sessions.
Residents were scheduled to practice with the instructor in a one-to-one ses- sion.
The instructor was present during all the sessions and gave instructions and feedback in real time throughout all sessions (traditional face-to-face feedback modality).
|
|
実験的:Asynchronous distance feedback (ASYNC).
The experimental group practiced with asynchronous distance feedback (ASYNC).
Residents scheduled their sessions and attended the simulation laboratory alone.
The resident logged in to the C1DO1 platform.The student recorded himself, performing the observed technique.
The instructor was not present and provided feedback asynchronously via a C1DO1 platform.
The ASYNC included texts, audio recordings, drawings annotating the trainee's video, and short example error videos from a library.
In addition to the specific feedback in response to residents' videos, instructors also provided an objective assessment based on scores using a 9-item global rating scale (GRS).
The student reviewed their feedback in the platform and identified the skills to improve for the next session.
|
The experimental group practiced with ASYNC.
Residents sched- uled their sessions and attended the simulation laboratory alone.
The resident logged in to the C1DO1 platform.
In the platform, the second 4 stages were practical exercises.
The student recorded himself, performing the observed technique.9
The instructor was not present and provided feedback asynchronously via a C1DO1 platform.
The ASYNC included texts, audio recordings, drawings annotating the trainee's video, and short example error videos from a library.
In addition to the specific feedback in response to residents' videos, instructors also provided an objective assessment based on scores using a 9-item global rating scale (GRS).
The student reviewed their feedback in the platform and identified the skills to improve for the next session.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Performance assessment
時間枠:8 weeks
|
The PRE and POST assessments were videotaped for evaluation by 2 independent and blinded reviewers.
The simulation center staff recorded the assessment videos for a standard vision of the participant's hands and the ultrasound image.
Two reviewers rated each resident's performance using an specific GRS previously validated.
The reviewers were different from the instructors.
|
8 weeks
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
ICSAD measurement
時間枠:8 weeks
|
Two sensors of a tracking motion device were attached to the operator's hands, during the assess- ment.
The Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) is a device that tracks hand motion during a procedure using sensors placed on the back of the operator's hands.
In this study, the ICSAD device recorded the total distance traveled by both hands (TPL).
The simulation center staff installed the device in the operators' hands and recorded the data.
|
8 weeks
|
協力者と研究者
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Miranda PF, Araneda AL, Molina NP, Miranda FG, Morrison C, Corvetto MA, Altermatt FR. Simulated-based training for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block: determining the learning curve and transference to real patient. Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Nov 11;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00389-5.
- Corvetto MA, Kattan E, Ramirez G, Besa P, Abbott E, Zamorano E, Contreras V, Altermatt FR. Simulation-Based Training Program for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement: Randomized Comparative Study of in-Person Training With Synchronous Feedback Versus Distance Training With Asynchronous Feedback. Simul Healthc. 2024 Dec 1;19(6):373-378. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000805. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 251205008
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。