이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Simulation-based Training for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block

2026년 6월 16일 업데이트: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Simulation-based Training for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block Performance: a Randomized Non-inferiority Study Comparing Direct Synchronous Feedback With Remote Asynchronous Feedback

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether remote asynchronous feedback is non-inferior to direct synchronous feedback during simulation-based training for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block performance. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does asynchronous feedback achieve technical skill acquisition outcomes comparable to direct synchronous feedback? Can asynchronous feedback optimize teaching resources without compromising training quality?

Researchers will compare two feedback modalities within a simulation-based training program for deliberate practice of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block techniques.

Participants will:

Receive training with either direct synchronous feedback or remote asynchronous feedback Perform simulation-based deliberate practice sessions Be assessed using validated instruments for technical skill performance

연구 개요

상세 설명

For the use of the simulation program based on the implementation of a continuous sciatic popliteal nerve block. To achieve this, a simulation program developed by researchers from the School of Medicine of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile will be used for residents from the Emergency Medicine and Critical Care specialty program.

Following approval by the institutional ethics committee, the scenario for 50 students will be prepared. The procedure room will include all the equipment required for performing the intervention, consisting of a video explaining the technique. The study will assess:

(i) Fundamentals and use of echography. (ii) Knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology. (iii) Development of dexterity: ability to perform the procedure correctly.

The students will receive a one-hour lecture on the procedure. This assessment will consist of performing a sciatic popliteal nerve block on a simulated clinical scenario. An evaluator blinded to the study objectives will assess participants using a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a checklist. Additionally, a third evaluator will use the GRS and the checklist remotely (asynchronous feedback).

After the evaluations, the simulation room will remain open throughout the week for students to perform up to five practice sessions. The number of movements and total procedure time will be recorded during each assessment. Students will also complete a satisfaction questionnaire and a final written test after the simulation activity and before the final assessment.

Once the previous evaluation is completed, residents may begin their training.

Subsequently, residents will attend simulation sessions specifically designed to practice the sciatic popliteal nerve block under the guidance of an instructor. Sessions will last 2 hours. Each resident will complete 2 sessions, each separated by 1 week. During the first session, the instructor will explain and supervise correct use of the ultrasound equipment. During the second session, the resident will perform the entire procedure independently. The resident's performance will be recorded and later evaluated through an assessment platform.

One week after training completion, residents will undergo a final assessment using the same tools. The duration of the simulation-based sciatic popliteal nerve block procedure will be recorded. Total procedure time and the number of movements performed during the procedure will also be documented. Additionally, the procedure will be video recorded.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

40

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Santiago Metropolitan
      • Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 칠레, 7700950
        • 모병
        • Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
        • 연락하다:
        • 연락하다:
          • Pablo Miranda, Assistant professor

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 어린이
  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medicine students

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No exclusion Criteria

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 다른
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Synchronous direct feedback (SYNC)
The control group practiced with synchronous direct feedback (SYNC). The SYNC group attended the simulation laboratory for practice sessions. Residents were scheduled to practice with the instructor in a one-to-one ses- sion. The instructor was present during all the sessions and gave instructions and feedback in real time throughout all sessions (traditional face-to-face feedback modality).
The control group practiced with SYNC. The SYNC group attended the simulation laboratory for practice sessions. Residents were scheduled to practice with the instructor in a one-to-one ses- sion. The instructor was present during all the sessions and gave instructions and feedback in real time throughout all sessions (traditional face-to-face feedback modality).
실험적: Asynchronous distance feedback (ASYNC).
The experimental group practiced with asynchronous distance feedback (ASYNC). Residents scheduled their sessions and attended the simulation laboratory alone. The resident logged in to the C1DO1 platform.The student recorded himself, performing the observed technique. The instructor was not present and provided feedback asynchronously via a C1DO1 platform. The ASYNC included texts, audio recordings, drawings annotating the trainee's video, and short example error videos from a library. In addition to the specific feedback in response to residents' videos, instructors also provided an objective assessment based on scores using a 9-item global rating scale (GRS). The student reviewed their feedback in the platform and identified the skills to improve for the next session.
The experimental group practiced with ASYNC. Residents sched- uled their sessions and attended the simulation laboratory alone. The resident logged in to the C1DO1 platform. In the platform, the second 4 stages were practical exercises. The student recorded himself, performing the observed technique.9 The instructor was not present and provided feedback asynchronously via a C1DO1 platform. The ASYNC included texts, audio recordings, drawings annotating the trainee's video, and short example error videos from a library. In addition to the specific feedback in response to residents' videos, instructors also provided an objective assessment based on scores using a 9-item global rating scale (GRS). The student reviewed their feedback in the platform and identified the skills to improve for the next session.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Performance assessment
기간: 8 weeks
The PRE and POST assessments were videotaped for evaluation by 2 independent and blinded reviewers. The simulation center staff recorded the assessment videos for a standard vision of the participant's hands and the ultrasound image. Two reviewers rated each resident's performance using an specific GRS previously validated. The reviewers were different from the instructors.
8 weeks

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
ICSAD measurement
기간: 8 weeks
Two sensors of a tracking motion device were attached to the operator's hands, during the assess- ment. The Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) is a device that tracks hand motion during a procedure using sensors placed on the back of the operator's hands. In this study, the ICSAD device recorded the total distance traveled by both hands (TPL). The simulation center staff installed the device in the operators' hands and recorded the data.
8 weeks

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2026년 5월 28일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2026년 12월 27일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 3월 27일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 5월 28일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 6월 16일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 6월 22일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 6월 22일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 6월 16일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

Synchronous direct feedback에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다