Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching Method in Nursing Process Education
調査の概要
詳細な説明
The nursing process is a systematic and scientific method that guides nursing care. Developing nursing students' competencies in the nursing process is essential for providing high-quality patient care. Innovative teaching methods may enhance students' learning experiences and improve educational outcomes.
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching, while the control group will receive traditional instruction. Following the educational intervention, students will prepare nursing care plans during their clinical practice.
Outcomes will be evaluated using a Nursing Process Knowledge Form, the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey, and the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument. The study will assess the effects of the intervention on nursing process competencies and learning motivation.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Avcılar
-
Istanbul、Avcılar、トルコ(Türkiye)、34310
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- First-year nursing students
- Successfully completed prerequisite nursing courses
- Grade point average (GPA) of 1.80 or higher
- Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
- Providing written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Students repeating the course
- Graduates of Vocational School of Health Services programs
- Withdrawal from the study at any stage
- Failure to complete study assessments or data collection forms
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Experimental Group
Nursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and participated in Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching activities based on case scenarios.
Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice.
|
Nursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process.
The experimental group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each.
Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis.
Students were asked to prepare a presentation using the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis.
One student from each group delivered the presentation on behalf of the group.
Feedback sessions were conducted following the presentations.
Subsequently, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Control Group
Nursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and prepared group nursing care plans based on case scenarios.
Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice.
|
Nursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process.
The control group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each.
Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis.
Students were asked to collaboratively prepare a nursing care plan based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis.
Following this activity, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes
時間枠:After completion of the educational intervention (approximately 4 weeks after baseline) and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
|
The quality of nursing care plans will be evaluated using the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument.
The Q-DIO is a 29-item instrument designed to assess the quality of nursing documentation, including nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes.
The instrument consists of four domains: Nursing Diagnoses as Process, Nursing Diagnoses as Outcomes, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes.
Higher scores indicate higher quality and more comprehensive documentation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and patient outcomes in nursing care plans.
|
After completion of the educational intervention (approximately 4 weeks after baseline) and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Nursing Process Knowledge Level Assessment Form
時間枠:At baseline and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
|
Students' knowledge of the nursing process will be evaluated using the Nursing Process Knowledge Level Assessment Form developed by the researcher.
The form consists of 25 multiple-choice questions.
The questions assess students' knowledge related to the nursing process, including assessment, nursing diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation stages.
The form was reviewed by three experts, and necessary revisions were made in line with expert feedback.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of knowledge regarding the nursing process.
|
At baseline and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
|
|
Instructional Materials Motivation Survey
時間枠:At the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
|
Students' learning motivation will be evaluated using the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS), which is based on Keller's ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) motivation model.
The survey consists of 24 items and two subscales: Attention-Relevance and Confidence-Satisfaction.
The Attention-Relevance subscale evaluates students' interest in and perceived relevance of the instructional content, whereas the Confidence-Satisfaction subscale assesses students' confidence and satisfaction with the learning experience.
Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Total scores range from 24 to 120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of learning motivation.
|
At the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- スタディチェア:Funda Büyükyılmaz, Professor、Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- 2025-749
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。