Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching Method in Nursing Process Education

30. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Sevim Uzuncan, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching or a control group receiving traditional instruction. The effects of the intervention on nursing process competencies and learning motivation will be evaluated.

Studienübersicht

Status

Aktiv, nicht rekrutierend

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The nursing process is a systematic and scientific method that guides nursing care. Developing nursing students' competencies in the nursing process is essential for providing high-quality patient care. Innovative teaching methods may enhance students' learning experiences and improve educational outcomes.

This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching, while the control group will receive traditional instruction. Following the educational intervention, students will prepare nursing care plans during their clinical practice.

Outcomes will be evaluated using a Nursing Process Knowledge Form, the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey, and the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument. The study will assess the effects of the intervention on nursing process competencies and learning motivation.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

100

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Türkei (türkiye)
    • Avcılar
      • Istanbul, Avcılar, Türkei (türkiye), 34310
        • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First-year nursing students
  • Successfully completed prerequisite nursing courses
  • Grade point average (GPA) of 1.80 or higher
  • Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
  • Providing written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students repeating the course
  • Graduates of Vocational School of Health Services programs
  • Withdrawal from the study at any stage
  • Failure to complete study assessments or data collection forms

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Experimental Group
Nursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and participated in Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching activities based on case scenarios. Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice.
Verhalten: Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching
Nursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process. The experimental group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each. Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis. Students were asked to prepare a presentation using the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis. One student from each group delivered the presentation on behalf of the group. Feedback sessions were conducted following the presentations. Subsequently, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice.
Aktiver Komparator: Control Group
Nursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and prepared group nursing care plans based on case scenarios. Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice.
Verhalten: Traditional Teaching
Nursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process. The control group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each. Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis. Students were asked to collaboratively prepare a nursing care plan based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis. Following this activity, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes
Zeitfenster: After completion of the educational intervention (approximately 4 weeks after baseline) and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
The quality of nursing care plans will be evaluated using the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument. The Q-DIO is a 29-item instrument designed to assess the quality of nursing documentation, including nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. The instrument consists of four domains: Nursing Diagnoses as Process, Nursing Diagnoses as Outcomes, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes. Higher scores indicate higher quality and more comprehensive documentation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and patient outcomes in nursing care plans.
After completion of the educational intervention (approximately 4 weeks after baseline) and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Nursing Process Knowledge Level Assessment Form
Zeitfenster: At baseline and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Students' knowledge of the nursing process will be evaluated using the Nursing Process Knowledge Level Assessment Form developed by the researcher. The form consists of 25 multiple-choice questions. The questions assess students' knowledge related to the nursing process, including assessment, nursing diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation stages. The form was reviewed by three experts, and necessary revisions were made in line with expert feedback. Higher scores indicate a higher level of knowledge regarding the nursing process.
At baseline and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Instructional Materials Motivation Survey
Zeitfenster: At the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Students' learning motivation will be evaluated using the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS), which is based on Keller's ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) motivation model. The survey consists of 24 items and two subscales: Attention-Relevance and Confidence-Satisfaction. The Attention-Relevance subscale evaluates students' interest in and perceived relevance of the instructional content, whereas the Confidence-Satisfaction subscale assesses students' confidence and satisfaction with the learning experience. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 24 to 120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of learning motivation.
At the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Ermittler

  • Studienstuhl: Funda Büyükyılmaz, Professor, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

9. April 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Juni 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Juni 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

23. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

30. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

1. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

1. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

30. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 2025-749

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves educational data collected from nursing students, and participant confidentiality and privacy will be protected in accordance with ethical approval and institutional regulations.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Pflegeprozess

Klinische Studien zur Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Ireland

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

3
Abonnieren