このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Uncertainty About the Benefits of New Cancer Drugs and Patients' Treatment Preferences

2026年7月30日 更新者:Avi Cherla、London School of Economics and Political Science

Uncertainty About the Benefits of New Cancer Drugs and Patients' Treatment Preferences: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study of current or former cancer patients will evaluate the effect of learning about uncertainties with the benefits of a new cancer drug on their hypothetical decisions to take the drug and their perceptions of the drug's effectiveness.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Many new cancer drugs are approved based on uncertain benefits. Without knowledge of this information, patients may overestimate the benefits of new cancer drugs, resulting in decisions that are not reflective of their individual treatment preferences. A previous study found that learning about uncertainties with a new cancer drug's benefits (such as the drug's small magnitude of effect or limited trial population) reduced the proportion of people who were willing to take the drug. It is unclear whether these findings are generalizable to patients with cancer, who may have different treatment preferences, and may weigh uncertainty about the benefits of new cancer drugs differently from the general public.

In this study, US adults with a current or former cancer diagnosis will be recruited to evaluate the effect of learning about uncertainties with the benefits of a new cancer drug on their hypothetical decisions to take the drug and their perceptions of the drug's effectiveness. Patients will be randomized to 1 of 5 interventions: (1) no uncertainty information (control); or plain-language statements about uncertainties with (2) an unvalidated surrogate endpoint (unknown effect of the drug on survival or quality of life); (3) limited study population (the drug was not studied in patients of similar race or ethnicity); (4) small magnitude of effect (it is unknown whether patients would notice an improvement with the drug), or (5) a combination of all three uncertainties.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

3000

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • US adults with a current or former cancer diagnosis (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer),
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Fluent in English
  • Residing in the United States.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who do not have a former cancer diagnosis or who were diagnosed with nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • Adults who complete the survey in under 150 seconds, and who do not meet the inclusion criteria.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:他の
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:トリプル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
プラセボコンパレーター:Control
No uncertainty information
No uncertainty information
アクティブコンパレータ:Unvalidated surrogate endpoint
Zenova has only been shown to shrink the size of tumors. It is unknown whether Zenova improves how patients feel or how long they live.
Zenova has only been shown to shrink the size of tumors. It is unknown whether Zenova improves how patients feel or how long they live.
アクティブコンパレータ:Limited study population
Zenova has not been studied in patients similar to Alex (patients with her race and ethnicity). It is unknown whether Zenova will work and what harms it will have for patients like her.
Zenova has not been studied in patients similar to Alex (patients with her race and ethnicity). It is unknown whether Zenova will work and what harms it will have for patients like her.
アクティブコンパレータ:Small magnitude of effect
It is unknown whether patients with non-small cell lung cancer will notice an improvement with Zenova.
It is unknown whether patients with non-small cell lung cancer will notice an improvement with Zenova.
アクティブコンパレータ:Multiple uncertainties
All 3 statements shown above
All 3 statements shown above

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Hypothetical decisions
時間枠:Assessed immediately after the intervention

Imagine you were Alex and diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. How likely would you be to take the new drug, Zenova?

  • Response options: Very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, somewhat likely, very likely
Assessed immediately after the intervention

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Perceptions of treatment effectiveness
時間枠:Assessed immediately after the intervention

Imagine you were Alex and diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. How likely would you be to take the new drug, Zenova?

- Response options: Very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, somewhat likely, very likely

Assessed immediately after the intervention
Understanding
時間枠:Assessed immediately after the intervention

Please rate your agreement with the following statement

  • Zenova has been studied in patients that are similar to Alex (race and ethnicity)
  • Zenova improves how patients feel or how long they live
  • Zenova has a noticeable improvement for patients
  • Response options: Strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree
Assessed immediately after the intervention
Emotions
時間枠:Assessed immediately after the intervention

If you were Alex, how worried would you feel about taking Zenova?

- Response options: Very worried, slightly worried, not very worried, not worried at all.

Assessed immediately after the intervention
Trust
時間枠:Assessed immediately after the intervention

To what extent do you think the information about Zenova is trustworthy? To what extent do you think the FDA, which approved Zenova and produced this information, is trustworthy? To what extent do you think Alex's doctor, who recommended and prescribed Zenova, is trustworthy?

- Response options: Not at all trustworthy, somewhat untrustworthy, somewhat trustworthy, very trustworthy

Assessed immediately after the intervention

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Perceived importance in knowing about uncertainty
時間枠:Assessed immediately after the intervention

Please rate your agreement with the following:

The information about Zenova was helpful. Uncertainties about drug benefits and harms should always be communicated.

- Response options: Strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree.

Assessed immediately after the intervention

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年7月14日

一次修了 (推定)

2026年10月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2026年10月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月29日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年7月7日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年7月9日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年8月4日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年7月30日

最終確認日

2026年7月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 714377

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する