此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Uncertainty About the Benefits of New Cancer Drugs and Patients' Treatment Preferences

2026年7月30日 更新者:Avi Cherla、London School of Economics and Political Science

Uncertainty About the Benefits of New Cancer Drugs and Patients' Treatment Preferences: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study of current or former cancer patients will evaluate the effect of learning about uncertainties with the benefits of a new cancer drug on their hypothetical decisions to take the drug and their perceptions of the drug's effectiveness.

研究概览

详细说明

Many new cancer drugs are approved based on uncertain benefits. Without knowledge of this information, patients may overestimate the benefits of new cancer drugs, resulting in decisions that are not reflective of their individual treatment preferences. A previous study found that learning about uncertainties with a new cancer drug's benefits (such as the drug's small magnitude of effect or limited trial population) reduced the proportion of people who were willing to take the drug. It is unclear whether these findings are generalizable to patients with cancer, who may have different treatment preferences, and may weigh uncertainty about the benefits of new cancer drugs differently from the general public.

In this study, US adults with a current or former cancer diagnosis will be recruited to evaluate the effect of learning about uncertainties with the benefits of a new cancer drug on their hypothetical decisions to take the drug and their perceptions of the drug's effectiveness. Patients will be randomized to 1 of 5 interventions: (1) no uncertainty information (control); or plain-language statements about uncertainties with (2) an unvalidated surrogate endpoint (unknown effect of the drug on survival or quality of life); (3) limited study population (the drug was not studied in patients of similar race or ethnicity); (4) small magnitude of effect (it is unknown whether patients would notice an improvement with the drug), or (5) a combination of all three uncertainties.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

3000

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • US adults with a current or former cancer diagnosis (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer),
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Fluent in English
  • Residing in the United States.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who do not have a former cancer diagnosis or who were diagnosed with nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • Adults who complete the survey in under 150 seconds, and who do not meet the inclusion criteria.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:三倍

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
安慰剂比较:Control
No uncertainty information
No uncertainty information
有源比较器:Unvalidated surrogate endpoint
Zenova has only been shown to shrink the size of tumors. It is unknown whether Zenova improves how patients feel or how long they live.
Zenova has only been shown to shrink the size of tumors. It is unknown whether Zenova improves how patients feel or how long they live.
有源比较器:Limited study population
Zenova has not been studied in patients similar to Alex (patients with her race and ethnicity). It is unknown whether Zenova will work and what harms it will have for patients like her.
Zenova has not been studied in patients similar to Alex (patients with her race and ethnicity). It is unknown whether Zenova will work and what harms it will have for patients like her.
有源比较器:Small magnitude of effect
It is unknown whether patients with non-small cell lung cancer will notice an improvement with Zenova.
It is unknown whether patients with non-small cell lung cancer will notice an improvement with Zenova.
有源比较器:Multiple uncertainties
All 3 statements shown above
All 3 statements shown above

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Hypothetical decisions
大体时间:Assessed immediately after the intervention

Imagine you were Alex and diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. How likely would you be to take the new drug, Zenova?

  • Response options: Very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, somewhat likely, very likely
Assessed immediately after the intervention

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Perceptions of treatment effectiveness
大体时间:Assessed immediately after the intervention

Imagine you were Alex and diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. How likely would you be to take the new drug, Zenova?

- Response options: Very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, somewhat likely, very likely

Assessed immediately after the intervention
Understanding
大体时间:Assessed immediately after the intervention

Please rate your agreement with the following statement

  • Zenova has been studied in patients that are similar to Alex (race and ethnicity)
  • Zenova improves how patients feel or how long they live
  • Zenova has a noticeable improvement for patients
  • Response options: Strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree
Assessed immediately after the intervention
Emotions
大体时间:Assessed immediately after the intervention

If you were Alex, how worried would you feel about taking Zenova?

- Response options: Very worried, slightly worried, not very worried, not worried at all.

Assessed immediately after the intervention
Trust
大体时间:Assessed immediately after the intervention

To what extent do you think the information about Zenova is trustworthy? To what extent do you think the FDA, which approved Zenova and produced this information, is trustworthy? To what extent do you think Alex's doctor, who recommended and prescribed Zenova, is trustworthy?

- Response options: Not at all trustworthy, somewhat untrustworthy, somewhat trustworthy, very trustworthy

Assessed immediately after the intervention

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Perceived importance in knowing about uncertainty
大体时间:Assessed immediately after the intervention

Please rate your agreement with the following:

The information about Zenova was helpful. Uncertainties about drug benefits and harms should always be communicated.

- Response options: Strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree.

Assessed immediately after the intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年7月14日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年10月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年10月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月29日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月7日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月9日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月4日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月30日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • 714377

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅