The Effect of Neuromotor-Cognitive Training on Performance Dancers (NCT-DANCE)
The Effect of Neuromotor-Cognitive Training on Dynamic Balance, Reaction Time and Sensorimotor Performance in Performance Dancers
This prospective randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effects of neuromotor-cognitive training on dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance in performance dancers.
The main hypotheses are:
H0: There is no difference in dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance between performance dancers who receive neuromotor-cognitive training and those who follow their routine training schedule.
H1: Performance dancers who receive neuromotor-cognitive training show significant improvements in dynamic balance, reaction time, and sensorimotor performance compared to those who follow their routine training schedule.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Performance dancers from the Aytunç Bentürk Dance Academy who meet the eligibility criteria will be included in this prospective randomized controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy of technology-supported training methods. Participants will be randomly allocated into two distinct groups using a standardized allocation protocol: the Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group (Experimental Arm) and the Routine Training Group (Control Arm).
The Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group will undergo a structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems to enhance neuromuscular control and cognitive processing speed. The Control Group will maintain their regular and routine dance practice routines during the study period without any additional structured experimental protocols.
Prior to the commencement of the intervention, all participants will be fully informed about the study procedures, and their formal consent will be obtained. Socio-demographic characteristics and baseline professional dance history will be documented using a structured evaluation form.
Objective pre- and post-test assessments will be conducted for both groups to evaluate sensorimotor adaptation. Dynamic balance, designated as the primary outcome measure, will be evaluated using the standardized Y-Balance Test. Secondary outcome measures, including objective reaction time and neuromuscular performance under cognitive load, will be rigorously quantified in milliseconds utilizing the BLAZEPOD® visual stimulus system along with the Reactive Jumping and Landing Test. All final measurements will be statistically analyzed using correlation and inter-rater reliability metrics to determine inter-group differences.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前：Aslı Yeral, Asst. Prof. Dr
- 電話番号：0537 965 8494
- メール：asli.yeral@yeditepe.edu.tr
研究連絡先のバックアップ
- 名前：Zeynep İnan
- 電話番号：0539 356 8804
- メール：zeynep.inan@yeditepe.edu.tr
研究場所
-
-
İ̇stanbul
-
Istanbul、İ̇stanbul、トルコ（Türkiye）、34755
- Yeditepe University Faculty of Health Sciences
-
コンタクト：
- Aslı Yeral
- 電話番号：0537 965 8494
- メール：asli.yeral@yeditepe.edu.tr
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being a professional or performance dancer actively training at the Aytunç Bentürk Dance Academy.
- Being between 18 and 25 years of age.
- Volunteering to participate in the study and providing written informed consent.
- Having no orthopedic, neurological, or systemic injuries in the lower extremities within the last 6 months that could affect balance and motor performance.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a history of major orthopedic surgery in the lower extremities.
- Any uncorrected visual or vestibular impairments that could negatively affect reaction time or postural control.
- Acute musculoskeletal pain or injury during the baseline assessment period.
- Failure to complete the baseline measurements or formal training sessions.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：防止
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Neuromotor-Cognitive Training Group
This group will receive a structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems (such as BLAZEPOD®) alongside their routine training schedule to enhance neuromuscular control, dynamic balance, and cognitive processing speed.
|
A structured, technology-supported training protocol incorporating visual stimulus systems to enhance neuromuscular control, dynamic balance, and cognitive processing speed.
|
|
介入なし：Routine Training Group
This group will maintain their regular and routine dance practice schedules at the academy during the study period, without receiving any additional technology-supported neuromotor-cognitive training protocols.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Y-Balance Test (YBT)
時間枠：The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
|
The Y-Balance Test will be used as the primary outcome measure to objectively evaluate the dynamic balance and postural control of the performance dancers.
Participants will perform maximal reach tasks in three distinct directions: anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral, while standing on a single limb.
The reach distances will be normalized to the participant's leg length, and a comprehensive composite score will be calculated.
Higher composite scores represent superior dynamic balance and enhanced neuromuscular control.
|
The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Reactive Jumping and Landing Test
時間枠：The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
|
This test will be implemented to assess sensorimotor performance and dynamic neuromuscular control during high-intensity functional movements.
Dancers will perform jump-landing sequences in response to sudden, dynamic visual cues that change in real-time.
The test quantifies movement execution and lower extremity coordination under cognitive load, providing critical metrics for sensorimotor adaptation and injury risk screening in performance dancers.
|
The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
|
|
Y-Shaped Reactive Agility Test
時間枠：The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
|
This test will be used to evaluate the reactive agility and rapid directional change performance of the dancers under visual cognitive load.
Participants will accelerate toward a central point and execute a sudden change of direction (left or right) based on a randomized visual stimulus.
The total completion time of the trial will be recorded using an electronic timing system.
Shorter completion times indicate superior reactive agility and faster neuromuscular processing.
|
The 8-week period between July 2026 and September 2026
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Sheppard JM, Young WB, Doyle TL, Sheppard TA, Newton RU. An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed. J Sci Med Sport. 2006 Aug;9(4):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.019. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
- Westrick RB, Miller JM, Carow SD, Gerber JP. Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;7(2):139-47.
- Ortiz A, Olson S, Libby CL, Kwon YH, Trudelle-Jackson E. Kinematic and kinetic reliability of two jumping and landing physical performance tasks in young adult women. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007 May;2(2):104-12.
- Mancini N, Mancini S, Ferrantino M, Moscatelli F, Messina G, Monda M, Ruberto M, Vasco P, Casella C, Colecchia FP, Messina A, Polito R. Effects of a Proprioceptive Training Program on Dynamic Balance and Neuromotor Performance in Adolescent Latin American Dancers. Sports (Basel). 2025 Nov 4;13(11):388. doi: 10.3390/sports13110388.
- Marchant DC. Attentional focusing instructions and force production. Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 26;1:210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00210. eCollection 2010.
- Peh SY, Chow JY, Davids K. Focus of attention and its impact on movement behaviour. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Jan;14(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
- Veale JP, Pearce AJ, Carlson JS. Reliability and validity of a reactive agility test for Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010 Jun;5(2):239-48. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.5.2.239.
- Muelas Perez R, Sabido Solana R, Barbado Murillo D, Moreno Hernandez FJ. Visual availability, balance performance and movement complexity in dancers. Gait Posture. 2014 Sep;40(4):556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
- Badau A. Identifying the Qualities of Attention and the Attentional Style in Indoor Team Sports: A Gender Comparison. Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 21;14(7):623. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070623.
- Nam SM, Park JW, Ko JH, Kim MJ. The Difference Between Expert Dancers' and Non-Dancers Tapping Timing With and Without an Auditory Stimulus at a Slow Tempo. Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1398-1414. doi: 10.1177/00315125241262547. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
- Huang HJ, Mercer VS. Dual-task methodology: applications in studies of cognitive and motor performance in adults and children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001 Fall;13(3):133-40.
- Skoe E, Krizman J, Anderson S, Kraus N. Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jun;25(6):1415-26. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht311. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
- Kuczynski M, Szymanska M, Biec E. Dual-task effect on postural control in high-level competitive dancers. J Sports Sci. 2011 Mar;29(5):539-45. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.544046.
- Nigmatullina Y, Hellyer PJ, Nachev P, Sharp DJ, Seemungal BM. The neuroanatomical correlates of training-related perceptuo-reflex uncoupling in dancers. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Feb;25(2):554-62. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht266. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
- Golomer E, Cremieux J, Dupui P, Isableu B, Ohlmann T. Visual contribution to self-induced body sway frequencies and visual perception of male professional dancers. Neurosci Lett. 1999 Jun 4;267(3):189-92. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00356-0.
- Paillard T. Plasticity of the postural function to sport and/or motor experience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jan;72:129-152. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
- Sirois-Leclerc G, Remaud A, Bilodeau M. Dynamic postural control and associated attentional demands in contemporary dancers versus non-dancers. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 21;12(3):e0173795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173795. eCollection 2017.
- Hugel F, Cadopi M, Kohler F, Perrin P. Postural control of ballet dancers: a specific use of visual input for artistic purposes. Int J Sports Med. 1999 Feb;20(2):86-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971098.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- yeditepe05
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。