このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Cost-utility Analysis of Outpatient Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Operating Room Electric Aspiration for the Management of First-trimester Miscarriage (ASPIR)

2026年7月27日 更新者：Nantes University Hospital

Cost-utility Analysis of Outpatient Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Operating Room Electric Aspiration for the Management of First-trimester Miscarriage (ASPIR Study)

The ASPIR study aims to evaluate the cost-utility of outpatient manual vacuum aspiration compared with operating room electric aspiration for the management of first-trimester miscarriage. It is hypothesized that manual aspiration will demonstrate equivalent clinical efficacy and patient quality of life while reducing healthcare costs.

調査の概要

状態

まだ募集していません

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

Miscarriage occurs in approximately 15% of pregnancies during the first trimester. In France, surgical management usually involves electric aspiration in the operating room under anesthesia, associated with hospital admission. Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) is widely used in low-resource settings and for induced abortion, with demonstrated safety and patient satisfaction. This multicenter randomized controlled trial compares outpatient MVA under local anesthesia and inhaled analgesia versus electric aspiration (EA) under anesthesia in the operating room.

The primary objective is to assess the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR, cost per QALY) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include complications, pain, satisfaction, quality of life, and fertility at 12 months. The study anticipates enrolling 860 participants across multiple centers in France.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

860

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, aged 18-44 years
  • Ultrasound-confirmed first-trimester miscarriage requiring surgical management
  • Gestational age between 5 and 12 weeks of amenorrhea
  • Incomplete spontaneous abortion or ongoing non-viable pregnancy
  • Patient able to provide oral informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complete expulsion of pregnancy (endometrial thickness < 15 mm)
  • Choice of medical treatment with misoprostol
  • Elective termination of pregnancy
  • Unwanted pregnancy
  • Pregnancy of unknown location, molar pregnancy
  • Known uterine malformation
  • Prior surgical aspiration for the current pregnancy
  • Intrauterine device in place
  • Contraindicating medications (e.g. anticoagulants)
  • Protected adults (under guardianship)
  • Inability to complete study questionnaires
  • Lack of social security coverage
  • Haemorrhagic miscarriage

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか？

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的：ヘルスサービス研究
  • 割り当て：ランダム化
  • 介入モデル：並列代入
  • マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的：Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA)
Outpatient manual vacuum aspiration under local anesthesia and inhaled analgesia (MEOPA).
手順：Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA)
Performed in consultation under local anesthesia and inhaled analgesia, using a manual vacuum aspirator and appropriate cannula. Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.
アクティブコンパレータ：Electric aspiration in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia. Electric aspiration
Electric aspiration in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia. Performed in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia, using an electric suction device and appropriate cannula. Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.
手順：Electric aspiration (EA)
Performed in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia, using an electric suction device and appropriate cannula. Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.

この研究は何を測定していますか？

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR)
時間枠：3 months
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of outpatient MVA compared to operating room EA, from a collective perspective.
3 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Annual net financial benefit for health insurance over up to 5 years of different development scenarios for manual vacuum aspiration in consultation for the management of pregnancies terminated before 12 weeks of gestation
時間枠：up to 5 years
Annual net financial benefit for health insurance over up to 5 years of different development scenarios for manual vacuum aspiration in consultation for the management of pregnancies terminated before 12 weeks of gestation
up to 5 years
To compare the two management strategies in terms of success and intraoperative and postoperative complications
時間枠：1 month

To compare the two management strategies in terms of success and intraoperative and postoperative complications

  • 2.1 Management failure defined by the need for second-line treatment (aspiration, misoprostol, etc.)
  • 2.2 Intraoperative complications: change of strategy, bleeding greater than 200 ml, uterine perforation, etc., and all possible complications classified according to the Clavien and Dindo criteria
  • 2.3 Trophoblastic retention image defined by retention (heterogeneous intrauterine mass independent of the endometrium) greater than 20 mm thick on transvaginal ultrasound at M1.
1 month
To assess patient satisfaction
時間枠：day 1 and 2

To assess patient satisfaction:

A numerical scale (NS) (0-10) on Days 1 and 2.
day 1 and 2
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
時間枠：days 0, 1,7 and 1 and 3 months

To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of:

●Pain via NS (a scale from 0 to 10) on Day 0 (before the procedure, 30 min after the procedure +/- 30 min), Days 1, 7, 1, and 3
days 0, 1,7 and 1 and 3 months
The risk factors for failure
時間枠：3 months
The risk factors for failure at M3 studied will be: the term of the terminated pregnancy, patient compliance, patient satisfaction (numerical scale (from 0 to 10), patient characteristics (age).
3 months
Satisfaction with the patient's care by medical staff
時間枠：day 0 and 1 month
Satisfaction with the patient's care by medical staff will be assessed using an EN (numerical scale 0 to 10) at D0 and M1
day 0 and 1 month
Patient having been pregnant in days
時間枠：12 months
Patient having been pregnant at 12 months, pregnancy outcome and time to conception in days.
12 months
To assess patient satisfaction
時間枠：day 1 and 2 and 1 month et 3 month

To assess patient satisfaction:

A numerical scale (NS) (0-10) on Days 1 and 2. HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and PCL-5 questionnaires at 1 and 3 months
day 1 and 2 and 1 month et 3 month
To assess patient satisfaction
時間枠：1 and 3 months
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and PCL-5 questionnaires at 1 and 3 months
1 and 3 months
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
時間枠：Day 0, 1,7 and 1 and 3 months

To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of:

●Pain via NS (a scale from 0 to 10) on Day 0 (before the procedure, 30 min after the procedure +/- 30 min), Days 1, 7, 1, and 3
Day 0, 1,7 and 1 and 3 months
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
時間枠：Day 0 to 7

To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of:

●Analgesic consumption (type, quantity, and duration) from Day 0 to 7
Day 0 to 7
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
時間枠：Day 0 to 7

To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of:

●Number of pads used per day (Higham score) from Days 1 to 7
Day 0 to 7
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
時間枠：Day 0

To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of:

  • Duration of the procedure in minutes
  • Waiting time for therapeutic treatment in minutes
  • Time spent in hospital in minutes
Day 0
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
時間枠：1 and 3 months

To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)

● Postoperative complications will include:Perioperative bleeding greater than 200 ml (Higham score), infection (temperature >38°C and pelvic symptoms) …classified according to the Calvien and Dindo criteria, at M1, the persistence of abnormal bleeding, trophoblastic retention, at M3, the presence of amenorrhea outside the context of a new pregnancy
1 and 3 months
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
時間枠：1 et 3 months

To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of:

●quality of life questionnaires EQ-5D-5L, PGI-I at M1 and M3
1 et 3 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

Nantes University Hospital

捜査官

  • 主任研究者：Thibault Thubert, Pr、Nantes university hospital

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年10月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年1月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2029年10月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年5月28日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年7月27日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年7月28日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年7月28日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年7月27日

最終確認日

2026年7月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

キーワード

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • RC24_0471
  • 2025-A00724-45 (その他の識別子：ANSM)

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

未定

IPD プランの説明

Individual participant data may be shared upon reasonable request, subject to sponsor approval and compliance with French/EU data protection regulations (GDPR).

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する