Cost-utility Analysis of Outpatient Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Operating Room Electric Aspiration for the Management of First-trimester Miscarriage (ASPIR)
Cost-utility Analysis of Outpatient Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Operating Room Electric Aspiration for the Management of First-trimester Miscarriage (ASPIR Study)
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Interventio / Hoito
Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus
Miscarriage occurs in approximately 15% of pregnancies during the first trimester. In France, surgical management usually involves electric aspiration in the operating room under anesthesia, associated with hospital admission. Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) is widely used in low-resource settings and for induced abortion, with demonstrated safety and patient satisfaction. This multicenter randomized controlled trial compares outpatient MVA under local anesthesia and inhaled analgesia versus electric aspiration (EA) under anesthesia in the operating room.
The primary objective is to assess the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR, cost per QALY) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include complications, pain, satisfaction, quality of life, and fertility at 12 months. The study anticipates enrolling 860 participants across multiple centers in France.
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Arvioitu)
Vaihe
- Ei sovellettavissa
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Opiskeluyhteys
- Nimi: Thibault Thubert, Pr
- Puhelinnumero: +33253482443
- Sähköposti: thibault.thubert@chu-nantes.fr
Opiskelupaikat
-
-
-
Nantes, Ranska, 44000
- CHU de Nantes
-
Ottaa yhteyttä:
- Thibault Thubert, Pr
- Puhelinnumero: +33 2 53 48 24 43
- Sähköposti: thibault.thubert@chu-nantes.fr
-
-
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
- Aikuinen
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female, aged 18-44 years
- Ultrasound-confirmed first-trimester miscarriage requiring surgical management
- Gestational age between 5 and 12 weeks of amenorrhea
- Incomplete spontaneous abortion or ongoing non-viable pregnancy
- Patient able to provide oral informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Complete expulsion of pregnancy (endometrial thickness < 15 mm)
- Choice of medical treatment with misoprostol
- Elective termination of pregnancy
- Unwanted pregnancy
- Pregnancy of unknown location, molar pregnancy
- Known uterine malformation
- Prior surgical aspiration for the current pregnancy
- Intrauterine device in place
- Contraindicating medications (e.g. anticoagulants)
- Protected adults (under guardianship)
- Inability to complete study questionnaires
- Lack of social security coverage
- Haemorrhagic miscarriage
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
- Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Terveyspalvelututkimus
- Jako: Satunnaistettu
- Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
- Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)
Aseet ja interventiot
Osallistujaryhmä / Arm |
Interventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
Kokeellinen: Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA)
Outpatient manual vacuum aspiration under local anesthesia and inhaled analgesia (MEOPA).
|
Performed in consultation under local anesthesia and inhaled analgesia, using a manual vacuum aspirator and appropriate cannula.
Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Electric aspiration in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia. Electric aspiration
Electric aspiration in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia.
Performed in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia, using an electric suction device and appropriate cannula.
Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.
|
Performed in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia, using an electric suction device and appropriate cannula.
Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR)
Aikaikkuna: 3 months
|
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of outpatient MVA compared to operating room EA, from a collective perspective.
|
3 months
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Annual net financial benefit for health insurance over up to 5 years of different development scenarios for manual vacuum aspiration in consultation for the management of pregnancies terminated before 12 weeks of gestation
Aikaikkuna: up to 5 years
|
Annual net financial benefit for health insurance over up to 5 years of different development scenarios for manual vacuum aspiration in consultation for the management of pregnancies terminated before 12 weeks of gestation
|
up to 5 years
|
|
To compare the two management strategies in terms of success and intraoperative and postoperative complications
Aikaikkuna: 1 month
|
To compare the two management strategies in terms of success and intraoperative and postoperative complications
|
1 month
|
|
To assess patient satisfaction
Aikaikkuna: day 1 and 2
|
To assess patient satisfaction: A numerical scale (NS) (0-10) on Days 1 and 2. |
day 1 and 2
|
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
Aikaikkuna: days 0, 1,7 and 1 and 3 months
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of: ●Pain via NS (a scale from 0 to 10) on Day 0 (before the procedure, 30 min after the procedure +/- 30 min), Days 1, 7, 1, and 3 |
days 0, 1,7 and 1 and 3 months
|
|
The risk factors for failure
Aikaikkuna: 3 months
|
The risk factors for failure at M3 studied will be: the term of the terminated pregnancy, patient compliance, patient satisfaction (numerical scale (from 0 to 10), patient characteristics (age).
|
3 months
|
|
Satisfaction with the patient's care by medical staff
Aikaikkuna: day 0 and 1 month
|
Satisfaction with the patient's care by medical staff will be assessed using an EN (numerical scale 0 to 10) at D0 and M1
|
day 0 and 1 month
|
|
Patient having been pregnant in days
Aikaikkuna: 12 months
|
Patient having been pregnant at 12 months, pregnancy outcome and time to conception in days.
|
12 months
|
|
To assess patient satisfaction
Aikaikkuna: day 1 and 2 and 1 month et 3 month
|
To assess patient satisfaction: A numerical scale (NS) (0-10) on Days 1 and 2. HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and PCL-5 questionnaires at 1 and 3 months |
day 1 and 2 and 1 month et 3 month
|
|
To assess patient satisfaction
Aikaikkuna: 1 and 3 months
|
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and PCL-5 questionnaires at 1 and 3 months
|
1 and 3 months
|
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
Aikaikkuna: Day 0, 1,7 and 1 and 3 months
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of: ●Pain via NS (a scale from 0 to 10) on Day 0 (before the procedure, 30 min after the procedure +/- 30 min), Days 1, 7, 1, and 3 |
Day 0, 1,7 and 1 and 3 months
|
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
Aikaikkuna: Day 0 to 7
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of: ●Analgesic consumption (type, quantity, and duration) from Day 0 to 7 |
Day 0 to 7
|
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
Aikaikkuna: Day 0 to 7
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of: ●Number of pads used per day (Higham score) from Days 1 to 7 |
Day 0 to 7
|
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
Aikaikkuna: Day 0
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of:
|
Day 0
|
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
Aikaikkuna: 1 and 3 months
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction) ● Postoperative complications will include:Perioperative bleeding greater than 200 ml (Higham score), infection (temperature >38°C and pelvic symptoms) …classified according to the Calvien and Dindo criteria, at M1, the persistence of abnormal bleeding, trophoblastic retention, at M3, the presence of amenorrhea outside the context of a new pregnancy |
1 and 3 months
|
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction)
Aikaikkuna: 1 et 3 months
|
To compare the two strategies (electric suction versus manual vacuum kit suction), measurement of: ●quality of life questionnaires EQ-5D-5L, PGI-I at M1 and M3 |
1 et 3 months
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Sponsori
Tutkijat
- Päätutkija: Thibault Thubert, Pr, Nantes university hospital
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus (Arvioitu)
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Avainsanat
Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- RC24_0471
- 2025-A00724-45 (Muu tunniste: ANSM)
Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)
Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?
IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus
Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .