Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills
Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills: A Randomised Study Assessing Long-Term Retention in a Pakistani Medical School
This study aimed to compare Halsted's "See One, Do One" method with Peyton's Four-Step Approach for teaching basic surgical skills to undergraduate medical students in a simulated skills-laboratory setting at Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. Medical students were randomised to Halsted and Peyton Arms and were taught Four Surgical Skills i-e Gloving by open method, Incision Making, Interrupted suturing, One-handed reef knot. After three months, all participants were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by an independent assessor(academic surgeon) blinded to the participants' group allocation.
Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
Skills-lab training as a procedural teaching approach is nowadays part of the training programs of almost all medical faculties. Certain components like observation, clinical skills, practice and decision-making have been shown to contribute to a successful learning experience in skills labs. It offers a safe, "mistake-forgiving" training environment that allows students to practice procedures on mannequins, with standardised patients or with each other before performing procedural skills on real patients,
The positive effect of skills-lab training sessions on learning outcomes and transfer of acquired skills to clinical practice has been shown in a variety of different settings. It has become a necessity for every undergraduate medical student/teacher to be aware of the basic methodologies taught through skills lab training, which should be practised in every medical institution.
In the studies, a lot of instructional techniques that include various steps to convey clinical technical skills to learners have been described. It includes some established teaching techniques, for example, Halsted's traditional teacher-centred "See one do one" approach. In this form of teaching, students learn only by observing an experienced surgeon explaining and demonstrating the skill. This can later be practised on artificial skin models. It's a process of active learning in a continual cycle. Another instructional approach that is becoming increasingly pervasive in medical studies is "Peyton's Four-Step Approach" This methodology was established based on the work of Peyton and was readily adapted in the last decade by medical institutes throughout the world.
It consists of four clearly defined instructional steps:
- Step 1 - "Demonstrate": The trainer demonstrates the skill without adding any comments.
- Step 2 - "Talk the trainee through": The trainer demon¬strates the respective skill while explaining each proce¬dural sub step in detail.
- Step 3 - "Trainee talks trainer through": The trainer performs the skill for a third time, based on the sub steps described to him/her by the trainee.
- Step 4 - "Trainee does": The trainee performs the skill on his/her own
Probable benefits of the technique include the grouping of several learning theories. Especially step three, when the trainee instructs the trainer, seems to be an important step in student learning. The student first has to analyse the first two steps, which are based on a social-cognitive approach to learning theory, i.e. thinking and sharing. This gives the student time to organise their thoughts before actively saying it. In addition, the reasoning process called self-explanation seems to facilitate the integration of new knowledge into existing knowledge.
We know it is no question that the instructional methods used to develop better grip of new clinical skills have huge impact in developing skill performance, but the contrasting results of different instructional methods for different surgical skills including both basic and advance surgical skills, require further evaluation.
This study aims to determine the better approach of teaching surgical skills, so that the same would be employed in future to impart surgical skills to junior surgeons, postgraduate trainees, interns and undergraduate students in skills lab.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Sindh
-
Karachi、Sindh、パキスタン、74200
- Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical students of DMC with no prior exposure to surgical skills.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Students who had previously attended any basic surgical skills workshop.
- Students who had participated in surgical camps or had prior hands-on surgical experience.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:他の
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Halsted
Skills taught using Halsted's 'See one, do one' approach
|
Participants in Halsted group were taught the following four skills employing Halsted 'see one do one' approach:
|
|
実験的:Peyton
Skills taught using Peyton's Four-Step Approach
|
Participants in this group were taught the following four skills employing Peyton's Four-step approach:
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Skill Performance score
時間枠:3 months
|
After three months, all participants in both arms were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by independent assesor blinded to the participants' group allocation. Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect. |
3 months
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Teach skill
時間枠:1 day
|
The time required to teach each of the four skills was recorded in both arms.
|
1 day
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Syed Ali Haider, FCPS,F.MAS, FACS、Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Romero P, Gunther P, Kowalewski KF, Friedrich M, Schmidt MW, Trent SM, De La Garza JR, Muller-Stich BP, Nickel F. Halsted's "See One, Do One, and Teach One" versus Peyton's Four-Step Approach: A Randomized Trial for Training of Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying. J Surg Educ. 2018 Mar-Apr;75(2):510-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
- Seifert LB, Schnurr B, Stefanescu MC, Sader R, Ruesseler M, Sterz J. Comparing video-based versions of Halsted's 'see one, do one' and Peyton's '4-step approach' for teaching surgical skills: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02105-5.
- Krautter M, Weyrich P, Schultz JH, Buss SJ, Maatouk I, Junger J, Nikendei C. Effects of Peyton's four-step approach on objective performance measures in technical skills training: a controlled trial. Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jul-Sep;23(3):244-50. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.586917.
- Giacomino K, Caliesch R, Sattelmayer KM. The effectiveness of the Peyton's 4-step teaching approach on skill acquisition of procedures in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis with integrated meta-regression. PeerJ. 2020 Oct 9;8:e10129. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10129. eCollection 2020.
- Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Application of the "see one, do one, teach one" concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):1194-1201. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a0b3.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- IRB-1784/DUHS
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
IPD 共有時間枠
IPD 共有アクセス基準
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。