Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills

6. august 2026 oppdatert av: Syed Ali Haider, Dow University of Health Sciences

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills: A Randomised Study Assessing Long-Term Retention in a Pakistani Medical School

This study aimed to compare Halsted's "See One, Do One" method with Peyton's Four-Step Approach for teaching basic surgical skills to undergraduate medical students in a simulated skills-laboratory setting at Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. Medical students were randomised to Halsted and Peyton Arms and were taught Four Surgical Skills i-e Gloving by open method, Incision Making, Interrupted suturing, One-handed reef knot. After three months, all participants were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by an independent assessor(academic surgeon) blinded to the participants' group allocation.

Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Skills-lab training as a procedural teaching approach is nowadays part of the training programs of almost all medical faculties. Certain components like observation, clinical skills, practice and decision-making have been shown to contribute to a successful learning experience in skills labs. It offers a safe, "mistake-forgiving" training environment that allows students to practice procedures on mannequins, with standardised patients or with each other before performing procedural skills on real patients,

The positive effect of skills-lab training sessions on learning outcomes and transfer of acquired skills to clinical practice has been shown in a variety of different settings. It has become a necessity for every undergraduate medical student/teacher to be aware of the basic methodologies taught through skills lab training, which should be practised in every medical institution.

In the studies, a lot of instructional techniques that include various steps to convey clinical technical skills to learners have been described. It includes some established teaching techniques, for example, Halsted's traditional teacher-centred "See one do one" approach. In this form of teaching, students learn only by observing an experienced surgeon explaining and demonstrating the skill. This can later be practised on artificial skin models. It's a process of active learning in a continual cycle. Another instructional approach that is becoming increasingly pervasive in medical studies is "Peyton's Four-Step Approach" This methodology was established based on the work of Peyton and was readily adapted in the last decade by medical institutes throughout the world.

It consists of four clearly defined instructional steps:

  • Step 1 - "Demonstrate": The trainer demonstrates the skill without adding any comments.
  • Step 2 - "Talk the trainee through": The trainer demon¬strates the respective skill while explaining each proce¬dural sub step in detail.
  • Step 3 - "Trainee talks trainer through": The trainer performs the skill for a third time, based on the sub steps described to him/her by the trainee.
  • Step 4 - "Trainee does": The trainee performs the skill on his/her own

Probable benefits of the technique include the grouping of several learning theories. Especially step three, when the trainee instructs the trainer, seems to be an important step in student learning. The student first has to analyse the first two steps, which are based on a social-cognitive approach to learning theory, i.e. thinking and sharing. This gives the student time to organise their thoughts before actively saying it. In addition, the reasoning process called self-explanation seems to facilitate the integration of new knowledge into existing knowledge.

We know it is no question that the instructional methods used to develop better grip of new clinical skills have huge impact in developing skill performance, but the contrasting results of different instructional methods for different surgical skills including both basic and advance surgical skills, require further evaluation.

This study aims to determine the better approach of teaching surgical skills, so that the same would be employed in future to impart surgical skills to junior surgeons, postgraduate trainees, interns and undergraduate students in skills lab.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

50

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 74200
        • Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical students of DMC with no prior exposure to surgical skills.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who had previously attended any basic surgical skills workshop.
  • Students who had participated in surgical camps or had prior hands-on surgical experience.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Annen
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Halsted
Skills taught using Halsted's 'See one, do one' approach

Participants in Halsted group were taught the following four skills employing Halsted 'see one do one' approach:

  1. Gloving by open method.
  2. Incision Making
  3. Interrupted suturing
  4. One-handed reef knot
Eksperimentell: Peyton
Skills taught using Peyton's Four-Step Approach

Participants in this group were taught the following four skills employing Peyton's Four-step approach:

  1. Gloving by open method.
  2. Incision Making
  3. Interrupted suturing
  4. One-handed reef knot

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Skill Performance score
Tidsramme: 3 months

After three months, all participants in both arms were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by independent assesor blinded to the participants' group allocation.

Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.

3 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Time to Teach skill
Tidsramme: 1 day
The time required to teach each of the four skills was recorded in both arms.
1 day

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Syed Ali Haider, FCPS,F.MAS, FACS, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

9. januar 2025

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

23. mars 2026

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

23. mars 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

24. juli 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

24. juli 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

29. juli 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

10. august 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

6. august 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. august 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • IRB-1784/DUHS

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.

IPD-delingstidsramme

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SEVJE
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere