Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills

6. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Syed Ali Haider, Dow University of Health Sciences

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills: A Randomised Study Assessing Long-Term Retention in a Pakistani Medical School

This study aimed to compare Halsted's "See One, Do One" method with Peyton's Four-Step Approach for teaching basic surgical skills to undergraduate medical students in a simulated skills-laboratory setting at Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. Medical students were randomised to Halsted and Peyton Arms and were taught Four Surgical Skills i-e Gloving by open method, Incision Making, Interrupted suturing, One-handed reef knot. After three months, all participants were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by an independent assessor(academic surgeon) blinded to the participants' group allocation.

Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Skills-lab training as a procedural teaching approach is nowadays part of the training programs of almost all medical faculties. Certain components like observation, clinical skills, practice and decision-making have been shown to contribute to a successful learning experience in skills labs. It offers a safe, "mistake-forgiving" training environment that allows students to practice procedures on mannequins, with standardised patients or with each other before performing procedural skills on real patients,

The positive effect of skills-lab training sessions on learning outcomes and transfer of acquired skills to clinical practice has been shown in a variety of different settings. It has become a necessity for every undergraduate medical student/teacher to be aware of the basic methodologies taught through skills lab training, which should be practised in every medical institution.

In the studies, a lot of instructional techniques that include various steps to convey clinical technical skills to learners have been described. It includes some established teaching techniques, for example, Halsted's traditional teacher-centred "See one do one" approach. In this form of teaching, students learn only by observing an experienced surgeon explaining and demonstrating the skill. This can later be practised on artificial skin models. It's a process of active learning in a continual cycle. Another instructional approach that is becoming increasingly pervasive in medical studies is "Peyton's Four-Step Approach" This methodology was established based on the work of Peyton and was readily adapted in the last decade by medical institutes throughout the world.

It consists of four clearly defined instructional steps:

  • Step 1 - "Demonstrate": The trainer demonstrates the skill without adding any comments.
  • Step 2 - "Talk the trainee through": The trainer demon¬strates the respective skill while explaining each proce¬dural sub step in detail.
  • Step 3 - "Trainee talks trainer through": The trainer performs the skill for a third time, based on the sub steps described to him/her by the trainee.
  • Step 4 - "Trainee does": The trainee performs the skill on his/her own

Probable benefits of the technique include the grouping of several learning theories. Especially step three, when the trainee instructs the trainer, seems to be an important step in student learning. The student first has to analyse the first two steps, which are based on a social-cognitive approach to learning theory, i.e. thinking and sharing. This gives the student time to organise their thoughts before actively saying it. In addition, the reasoning process called self-explanation seems to facilitate the integration of new knowledge into existing knowledge.

We know it is no question that the instructional methods used to develop better grip of new clinical skills have huge impact in developing skill performance, but the contrasting results of different instructional methods for different surgical skills including both basic and advance surgical skills, require further evaluation.

This study aims to determine the better approach of teaching surgical skills, so that the same would be employed in future to impart surgical skills to junior surgeons, postgraduate trainees, interns and undergraduate students in skills lab.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

50

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 74200
        • Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical students of DMC with no prior exposure to surgical skills.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who had previously attended any basic surgical skills workshop.
  • Students who had participated in surgical camps or had prior hands-on surgical experience.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Halsted
Skills taught using Halsted's 'See one, do one' approach

Participants in Halsted group were taught the following four skills employing Halsted 'see one do one' approach:

  1. Gloving by open method.
  2. Incision Making
  3. Interrupted suturing
  4. One-handed reef knot
Experimental: Peyton
Skills taught using Peyton's Four-Step Approach

Participants in this group were taught the following four skills employing Peyton's Four-step approach:

  1. Gloving by open method.
  2. Incision Making
  3. Interrupted suturing
  4. One-handed reef knot

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Skill Performance score
Zeitfenster: 3 months

After three months, all participants in both arms were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by independent assesor blinded to the participants' group allocation.

Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.

3 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Time to Teach skill
Zeitfenster: 1 day
The time required to teach each of the four skills was recorded in both arms.
1 day

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Syed Ali Haider, FCPS,F.MAS, FACS, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

9. Januar 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

23. März 2026

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

23. März 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

24. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

24. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

29. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

10. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

6. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • IRB-1784/DUHS

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren