Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills

6 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Syed Ali Haider, Dow University of Health Sciences

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills: A Randomised Study Assessing Long-Term Retention in a Pakistani Medical School

This study aimed to compare Halsted's "See One, Do One" method with Peyton's Four-Step Approach for teaching basic surgical skills to undergraduate medical students in a simulated skills-laboratory setting at Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. Medical students were randomised to Halsted and Peyton Arms and were taught Four Surgical Skills i-e Gloving by open method, Incision Making, Interrupted suturing, One-handed reef knot. After three months, all participants were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by an independent assessor(academic surgeon) blinded to the participants' group allocation.

Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Skills-lab training as a procedural teaching approach is nowadays part of the training programs of almost all medical faculties. Certain components like observation, clinical skills, practice and decision-making have been shown to contribute to a successful learning experience in skills labs. It offers a safe, "mistake-forgiving" training environment that allows students to practice procedures on mannequins, with standardised patients or with each other before performing procedural skills on real patients,

The positive effect of skills-lab training sessions on learning outcomes and transfer of acquired skills to clinical practice has been shown in a variety of different settings. It has become a necessity for every undergraduate medical student/teacher to be aware of the basic methodologies taught through skills lab training, which should be practised in every medical institution.

In the studies, a lot of instructional techniques that include various steps to convey clinical technical skills to learners have been described. It includes some established teaching techniques, for example, Halsted's traditional teacher-centred "See one do one" approach. In this form of teaching, students learn only by observing an experienced surgeon explaining and demonstrating the skill. This can later be practised on artificial skin models. It's a process of active learning in a continual cycle. Another instructional approach that is becoming increasingly pervasive in medical studies is "Peyton's Four-Step Approach" This methodology was established based on the work of Peyton and was readily adapted in the last decade by medical institutes throughout the world.

It consists of four clearly defined instructional steps:

  • Step 1 - "Demonstrate": The trainer demonstrates the skill without adding any comments.
  • Step 2 - "Talk the trainee through": The trainer demon¬strates the respective skill while explaining each proce¬dural sub step in detail.
  • Step 3 - "Trainee talks trainer through": The trainer performs the skill for a third time, based on the sub steps described to him/her by the trainee.
  • Step 4 - "Trainee does": The trainee performs the skill on his/her own

Probable benefits of the technique include the grouping of several learning theories. Especially step three, when the trainee instructs the trainer, seems to be an important step in student learning. The student first has to analyse the first two steps, which are based on a social-cognitive approach to learning theory, i.e. thinking and sharing. This gives the student time to organise their thoughts before actively saying it. In addition, the reasoning process called self-explanation seems to facilitate the integration of new knowledge into existing knowledge.

We know it is no question that the instructional methods used to develop better grip of new clinical skills have huge impact in developing skill performance, but the contrasting results of different instructional methods for different surgical skills including both basic and advance surgical skills, require further evaluation.

This study aims to determine the better approach of teaching surgical skills, so that the same would be employed in future to impart surgical skills to junior surgeons, postgraduate trainees, interns and undergraduate students in skills lab.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

50

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistán, 74200
        • Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical students of DMC with no prior exposure to surgical skills.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who had previously attended any basic surgical skills workshop.
  • Students who had participated in surgical camps or had prior hands-on surgical experience.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Halsted
Skills taught using Halsted's 'See one, do one' approach

Participants in Halsted group were taught the following four skills employing Halsted 'see one do one' approach:

  1. Gloving by open method.
  2. Incision Making
  3. Interrupted suturing
  4. One-handed reef knot
Experimental: Peyton
Skills taught using Peyton's Four-Step Approach

Participants in this group were taught the following four skills employing Peyton's Four-step approach:

  1. Gloving by open method.
  2. Incision Making
  3. Interrupted suturing
  4. One-handed reef knot

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Skill Performance score
Periodo de tiempo: 3 months

After three months, all participants in both arms were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by independent assesor blinded to the participants' group allocation.

Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.

3 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Time to Teach skill
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
The time required to teach each of the four skills was recorded in both arms.
1 day

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Syed Ali Haider, FCPS,F.MAS, FACS, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

9 de enero de 2025

Finalización primaria (Actual)

23 de marzo de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

23 de marzo de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

24 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

24 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

29 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • IRB-1784/DUHS

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA
  • CIF
  • CÓDIGO_ANALÍTICO
  • RSC

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir