Effects of Weekly Basketball Training Distribution on Executive Function in Adolescents (VMBT-EF)
Effects of Volume-Matched Weekday-Distributed Versus Weekend-Concentrated Basketball Training on Executive Function in Adolescents: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
his study examined whether different ways of distributing the same weekly amount of basketball training affect executive function in adolescents. A total of 120 adolescents were randomly assigned to one of three groups: weekday-distributed basketball training, weekend-concentrated basketball training, or a control group that continued its usual activities.
Participants in both basketball training groups completed 180 minutes of training per week for 8 weeks. The weekday-distributed group trained for 36 minutes per session, five days per week, whereas the weekend-concentrated group trained for 90 minutes per session, two days per week. Executive function was assessed before and after the intervention.
The study aimed to determine whether basketball training improves executive function compared with usual activities and whether distributing the same weekly training volume across weekdays produces different effects from concentrating the training on weekends.
調査の概要
状態
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Shaanxi
-
Xi'an、Shaanxi、中国、710021
- Xi'an Medical University
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 13 to 16 years at enrollment.
- Enrolled in the participating local middle school.
- Medically eligible to participate in moderate-to-vigorous physical exercise.
- No systematic basketball or other sport-specific training during the 3 months before enrollment.
- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and able to complete the computerized cognitive tasks.
- Available to participate in the 8-week intervention and complete all scheduled assessments.
- Written informed consent provided by a parent or legal guardian and assent provided by the participant.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any illness or musculoskeletal injury that could prevent safe participation in basketball training.
- Current participation in another structured exercise, sport-specific training, or cognitive-training program.
- Any visual, neurological, or other condition that could interfere with completion of the computerized cognitive tasks.
- Medical advice or contraindications against participation in moderate-to-vigorous physical exercise.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:他の
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Weekday-Distributed Basketball Training
Participants completed 180 minutes of basketball training per week for 8 weeks.
The training was distributed across five weekday sessions, with each session lasting 36 minutes.
|
Participants completed basketball training five days per week for 8 weeks.
Each session lasted 36 minutes, resulting in a total weekly training volume of 180 minutes.
|
|
実験的:Weekend-Concentrated Basketball Training
Participants completed 180 minutes of basketball training per week for 8 weeks.
The training was concentrated into two weekend sessions, with each session lasting 90 minutes.
|
Participants completed basketball training two days per week for 8 weeks.
Each session lasted 90 minutes, resulting in a total weekly training volume of 180 minutes.
|
|
介入なし:Usual Activity Control
Participants maintained their usual daily activities and received no additional structured basketball training during the 8-week study period.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Flanker Reaction-Time Interference Effect
時間枠:Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Inhibitory control was assessed using a computerized Flanker task at baseline and immediately after the intervention.
The reaction-time interference effect was calculated as the mean reaction time for incongruent trials minus the mean reaction time for congruent trials and was expressed in milliseconds.
Change from baseline was calculated as the post-intervention value minus the baseline value.
Lower interference scores indicate better inhibitory control, and a negative change indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
|
Change From Baseline in 1-Back Task Accuracy
時間枠:Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Working memory was assessed using a computerized 1-back task at baseline and immediately after the intervention.
Performance was measured as the percentage of correct responses, ranging from 0% to 100%.
Change from baseline was calculated as the post-intervention accuracy minus the baseline accuracy.
Higher accuracy scores indicate better working memory performance, and a positive change indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
|
Change From Baseline in More-Odd Shifting Task Switching Cost
時間枠:Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Cognitive flexibility was assessed using a computerized More-Odd Shifting task at baseline and immediately after the intervention.
Switching cost was calculated as the mean reaction time for switch trials minus the mean reaction time for repeat trials and was expressed in milliseconds.
Change from baseline was calculated as the post-intervention value minus the baseline value.
Lower switching-cost values indicate better cognitive flexibility, and a negative change indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- BBT-EF-001
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。