Effects of a Patient Directed Web-portal to Improve Health Literacy Skills (PREP)
Access to the best available evidence, and the ability to obtain and understand such information is seen as necessary to protect the public's interests and critical to empowerment, but is also a precondition for participation in the decision making.
A web portal serving as a generic (non disease- specific) tailored tool was developed in the conceptual framework of shared decision making and evidence based practice to improve the lay- public's critical and social literacy skills and activation. A randomized controlled parallel trial using a simple randomization procedure will be conducted, including 200 parents of children <4 with internet access. Parents will be allocated to receive either the portal or no intervention. Primary and secondary outcomes include: the ability to find research based information, critical appraisal skills, perceived behavioural control, attitudes and perceived pressure associated with searching for information, and participation.
연구 개요
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
-
Oslo, 노르웨이, 0130
- Oslo University College, Faculty of Nursing
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Parents of children age <4 will be recruited with access to internet.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants will be excluded if one other in the household already participates in the study (due to spill-over effect) and if they do not have children <4.
- Since the recruitment will be done online, there is no need to screen for access to internet.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Portal arm
|
The portal was tailored to improve the lay public's' "healthy skepticism", or in other words, critical and social literacy skills to assist patients in the decision-making process and for improving access to health information and participation. Illustrated by typical examples which can be found in the news and through patient stories, the portal provides an introduction to research methods, the underlying principles of science and critical assessment tools appropriate for a lay public.
|
|
간섭 없음: Treatment as usal
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in predictors of search and use of health information
기간: Week 3
|
Based on the theory of planned behavioral manual a questionnaire has been developed and validated in order to explore what predictors (efficacy, attitudes and perceived pressure) to search and use of health infomration.
|
Week 3
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
The ability to find reliable answers to a health question
기간: Week 1
|
Participants will be asked to formulate a (health) question and to find information that can answer this question.
The participants will be asked to copy and paste the internet link to the information they found.The outcome will be evaluated pragmatically by categorizing the information as based on: 1. research or 2. expert advice/ other.
The information will be categorized blindly by two independent researchers.
The direction of effect is expected to be positive, in that more participants will find research based information than those in the control group.
|
Week 1
|
|
Critical appraisal of health information
기간: Week 2
|
Participants will be asked to rate a piece of health information about childhood vaccination using DISCERNs item number 16. DISCERN is an instrument designed to judge the quality of written information about treatment choices.
The mean value rating of the information will be measured against a "standard" rating made by experts on the same information.
The direction of effect is predicted to be positive, in that the mean overall score of the intervention group will be closer to the standard than the control group.
|
Week 2
|
|
Participation (activation)
기간: Week 3
|
The patient activation measure (PAM) has been developed to measure activation.
The instrument includes 4 domains; believing the patient role is important, having confidence and knowledge necessary to taking action, actually taking action to improve one's health, and staying the course under stress.
|
Week 3
|
|
Satisfaction with portal
기간: Week 3
|
We will also ask participants to comment on satisfaction with the portal after the other data collection has been submitted.
This will be done based on the Honeycomb criteria which were also used in the qualitative evaluation.
The honeycomb model is a well-renowned and much used instrument to measure user experience
|
Week 3
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 연구 책임자: Sølvi Helseth, Professor, Oslo University College
- 연구 책임자: Arild Bjørndal, Professor, Oslo University
- 수석 연구원: Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, MA, Oslo University College
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (추정)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- REK S-07414b [1.2007.2076]
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .