Motor Threshold and Motor Cortex Stimulation
The Relationship Between Motor Threshold and Effective Stimulation Threshold During Motor Cortex Stimulation
Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a form of brain stimulation for patients with neuropathic pain not responsive to medication. An electrode is placed on the surface of the brain and connected to a programmable battery in the chest.
The strength of stimulation can be individually adjusted by changing the voltage of stimulation. A too high voltage will produce side effects (e.g. seizures) while a too low voltage will not provide pain control. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal stimulation parameters in patients already implanted with a motor cortex stimulation who have received good pain relief. The actual voltage may vary widely between patients but the investigators feel that there may be an "ideal" voltage if it is measured as a percentage of motor threshold (PMT). If motor threshold is the stimulation voltage that can evoke a muscle contraction then a PMT = 80% would be a voltage that was eighty percent of that value. Although the actual voltage may be widely different between patients, the percentage needed may be very similar. The investigators therefore plan to measure the effect of different percentages of PMT in patients already being treated with motor cortex stimulation.
Systematic analysis of the findings of this study might help the individual participant and future patients to better programming and less side effects.
연구 개요
상세 설명
Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a form of brain stimulation for patients with medically refractory neuropathic pain. The strength of stimulation can be individually adjusted by changing the voltage of stimulation. Too high voltage will produce side effects (e.g. seizures) while too low voltage will not provide pain control. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal stimulation parameters in patients already implanted with a motor cortex stimulation who have received good pain relief. The actual voltage may vary widely between patients (because of the individual variations in tissue resistance) but the investigators feel that there may be an "ideal" voltage if it is measured as a percentage of motor threshold (PMT).
If motor threshold is the voltage that can evoke a muscle contraction then a PMT = 80% would be a voltage that was eighty percent of that value. Although the actual voltage may be different between patients, the effective PMT may be similar since it represents a more physiologic measure of stimulation.
Systematic analysis of the findings of this study might help the individual participant and future patients by reducing voltage to the lowest effective setting and reducing the chance of seizures.
Motor cortex stimulation is used in the treatment of neuropathic pain since 1991 but still no guidelines for programming exist and programming is therefore mainly bases on trial and error. This is mostly due to many variables influencing the choice of stimulation parameters and significant individual differences in susceptibility to stimulation. Routinely the motor threshold is determined during programming to identify the superior limit of voltage at which twitching is induced. No stimulation above the motor threshold should be performed as this is known to cause seizures. The voltage of simulation that will be effective for an individual is unknown at the beginning of the treatment.
The investigators try to find the lowest effective voltage because that will reduce the risk of stimulation-induced seizures and prolong the life of the pacemaker.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, 캐나다, V5Z 4E3
- Vancouver General Hospital
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patient more than 18 years of age
- Chronic neuropathic pain effectively treated with motor cortex stimulation
- Stable medication during the trial
- Willing and able to comply with the study protocol and to return per the follow-up visit schedule and able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator
- Technical malfunction of the MCS device
- History of seizures
- Unable to provide informed consent
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 크로스오버 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: -10% of effective PMT
Patients are set to a voltage 10% less than their original PMT at start of study, Changes in PMT settings
|
The patients current motor threshold is determined and the patient is set to a new PMT (= new treatment arm)
|
|
활성 비교기: former setting (+/- 0% of PMT)
Patients are set to their original PMT at start of study, Changes in PMT settings
|
The patients current motor threshold is determined and the patient is set to a new PMT (= new treatment arm)
|
|
실험적: +10% of effective PMT
Patients are set to a voltage 10% more than their original PMT at start of study, Changes in PMT settings
|
The patients current motor threshold is determined and the patient is set to a new PMT (= new treatment arm)
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
기간 |
|---|---|
|
Change in Pain measured on the Visual Analogue Scale with different PMT Settings
기간: at the End of each trial period, typically 14 days after changes in PMT Settings
|
at the End of each trial period, typically 14 days after changes in PMT Settings
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
기간 |
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life assessment with the SF-36 questionnaire
기간: at the end of each trial period, typically at 14 days
|
at the end of each trial period, typically at 14 days
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
기간 |
|---|---|
|
Pain assessment with the McGill pain questionnaire to record impact of pain
기간: at the end of each trial period, typically 14 days
|
at the end of each trial period, typically 14 days
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for the treatment of central pain. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1991;52:137-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9160-6_37.
- Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Treatment of thalamic pain by chronic motor cortex stimulation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Jan;14(1):131-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04058.x.
- Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Deiber MP, Cinotti L, Convers P, Sindou M, Mauguiere F, Laurent B. Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of central pain: electrophysiological and PET study. Pain. 1995 Sep;62(3):275-286. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00211-V.
- Lima MC, Fregni F. Motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Neurology. 2008 Jun 10;70(24):2329-37. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000314649.38527.93.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (추정)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
신경병성 통증에 대한 임상 시험
-
Bingol UniversityAtaturk University아직 모집하지 않음수술 전 불안 | 두려움 | PAIN
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York University; National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)모병
-
Istanbul University모병Masticatory Muscle Pain | 근시 통증 증후군 (MP)칠면조
-
Istanbul University모병이갈이 | 근막 통증 증후군 | Masticatory Muscle Pain | 현지 근육통터키 (Türkiye)