이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

RCT Examining the Effectiveness of Digital Picture Frame Use in Inpatient Setting

2019년 3월 4일 업데이트: Sean Kidd, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effectiveness of Digital Picture Frame Use on the Long Term Inpatient Experience

This study will be a randomized controlled trial that investigates the effectiveness of digital picture frames (DPF) installed in inpatient rooms on long stay inpatient wards servicing schizophrenia clients at CAMH. The effects on client experience will consider the domains of self-concept, interactions with healthcare staff, perception of space, and implications for the recovery process. The comparison of inpatient client experience with DPFs versus a control group (Treatment as Usual - TAU), offers the opportunity to examine the effectiveness of this type of environmental adaptation. This trial builds upon earlier work that demonstrated the feasibility of DPFs in this context.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Long term stays in mental health facilities have been shown to have unique challenges and implications. To a considerable extent these challenges grow out of the stigmatized nature of severe mental illnesses (SMI) such as schizophrenia. The social and self-stigma surrounding SMI can have major effects on those affected including decreased self-esteem, self-deprecation, and the development of a self-concept defined by the illness. When stigmatized interpretations of mental illness are internalized, those affected can find it very challenging to sustain non-illness identities and can ultimately result in the loss of non-illness related aspects of self-concept. Inpatient contexts are particularly challenging in this regard, with non-illness oriented identities very difficult to sustain given considerations of power differentials with providers, the reduction of autonomy and choice, and the removal of the individual from environments that are demonstrative of non-illness aspects of self.

Accordingly, a randomized controlled trial design will be used to consider the question: Does having a DPF in psychiatric inpatient unit rooms lead to improvements in interactions with the clinical team, perceptions of enhanced quality of physical space, and an improvement in the sustaining of non-illness aspects of self-concept? While the promising feasibility study findings might suggest hypotheses of improvement in these domains, we will consider this study exploratory given the complex environments inpatient units represent in the study of care quality and outcomes and the modest scope of this intervention. Finally, we will continue to collect feasibility data qualitatively, to inform further refinement of metrics and otherwise consider enhancements in intervention and research design.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

33

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, 캐나다, M5T 1R8
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All participants will have severe mental illness (SMI) defined as diagnosis with a major mental illness (in practice, will be primarily schizophrenia spectrum) and inherent to hospital admission will be substantive contact with services and disability affecting day-to-day functioning (Ruggeri, Leese, Thornicroft, Bisoffi, & Michelle, 2000).
  • Admitted to a CAMH inpatient unit, specifically units 2-2 and 2-3, with an anticipated length of stay of 4 weeks or more, as determined by the clinical team
  • Chart diagnosis of a major mental illness
  • Determined appropriate for study by staff psychiatrist and clinical team (capacity to consent confirmed, no precautions against having the device in the participant's room indicated)
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Proficiency in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not meet the above criteria

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 지지 요법
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Standard Care
Routine care is comprised of a high level of support from an interdisciplinary team with access to unit-specific and centralized programming
High level of support from an interdisciplinary team.
실험적: Digital Picture Frames

Setup: Over 1-2, approximately 30 minute meetings pictures will be uploaded onto the device from picture files provided by the participant and/or their family or an open online source (e.g., Google Images) that are relevant and of interest to the participant.

Installation: The picture frames are secured to a surface in the participant's room (most typically a table) by facilities staff. Participants are instructed in its use.

Check in: At midpoint (2 weeks) an RA will check in with the participant to informally discuss whether or not it continues to work, is being used, and if they want more pictures uploaded. If the latter is requested step 1 will be repeated.

The intervention is the provision of digital picture frames in long stay inpatient rooms in a ward at CAMH.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in Recovery Self Assessment (RSA; O'Connell et al., 2005)
기간: Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
To examine the degree to which inpatient staff are perceived as recognizing the individuality of the individual and engage in a hopeful and holistic manner. 4 items from the patient version will be used (1-5 point Likert scale).
Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8; Attkisson et al., 1995)
기간: After 4 weeks (post intervention)
Investigators will only use the general satisfaction question from this measure (1-5 point Likert scale). Only participants in the intervention arm will complete this question.
After 4 weeks (post intervention)
Change in Empowerment Scale (Rogers et al., 1997)
기간: Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Measures dimensions of self efficacy, self stigma and self concept (1-9 point Likert scale).
Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Change in Modified Engulfment Scale (McCay & Seeman, 1998)
기간: Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Only two items from this measure focussing specifically on self-concept will be used (1-5 point Likert scale).
Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Change in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965)
기간: Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
The broadest reaching and high factor loading item, 'On the whole I am satisfied with myself' will be used (1-4 point Likert scale).
Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Change in Scale to Assess Therapeutic Relationship (STAR; Mcguire-Snieckus et al., 2007)
기간: Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Three items assessing common factors in the therapeutic relationship with the clinical team are from the scale will be used (1-5 point Likert scale).
Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Change in Satisfaction with the physical environment of the inpatient unit
기간: Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
One question developed my investigators due to lack of standardized measures to specifically measure participant satisfaction with the physical environment of the inpatient unit (1-5 point Likert scale)
Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Change in Satisfaction with the rooms on the inpatient unit
기간: Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
One question developed by investigators due to lack of standardized measures to specifically measure participant satisfaction with their room on the inpatient unit (1-5 point Likert scale)
Baseline and after 4 weeks (post intervention)
Semi structured interviews
기간: After 4 weeks (post intervention)
SC participants will be asked broad questions about how satisfied they were with the inpatient unit space and what might be improved. These same questions will be asked of DPF participants, but will be followed by questions specific to the DPF support.
After 4 weeks (post intervention)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2016년 10월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2017년 9월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2017년 12월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2016년 10월 26일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2016년 10월 28일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2016년 11월 1일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2019년 3월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2019년 3월 4일

마지막으로 확인됨

2019년 3월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

미국에서 제조되어 미국에서 수출되는 제품

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다