- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT03581643
Validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients With Mild and Major Neurocognitive Disorder (MoCA-Valid)
The primary aim of our study is to investigate the specificity, the sensitivity, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA for mild and major NCD in a German-speaking population.
Secondary aims are: (1) to study the MoCA performance in different patient groups and (2) to compare the diagnostic properties of the MoCA with the ones of the MMSE (i.e., the current reference standard for screening of MCI).
연구 개요
상세 설명
Due to the demographical development, age-related diseases will drastically increase over the next decades. To face this healthcare challenge, early and accurate identification of cognitive impairment is crucial. The early detection of cognitive decline requires a tool that is short, easy to administer and interpret, and has high diagnostic accuracy. Currently, a widely used instrument is the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). However, the MMSE sensitivity is poor when identifying individuals with MCI, and it lacks meaningful assessment of executive functions. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been developed to address these weaknesses. It has demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy in patients with MCI, has less ceiling effect, and a higher test-retest-reliability. In addition, the MoCA better captures the cognitive domains proposed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).
In 2018, the investigators generated demographically adjusted normative values for the German version of the MoCA in cognitively healthy individuals. However, these normative data alone are not suitable to determine the exact diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, the investigators aim to analyze data from patients with cognitive disorders to validate the German version of the MoCA.
Validation studies for the MoCA have been performed in various languages and different etiologies, mainly in patients with MCI and AD. However, when applying the MoCA in a clinical routine setting, the patient population is more heterogeneous and different etiologies may lead to deficits in characteristic cognitive domains. Therefore, patients with diseases other than AD may perform differently on items of the MoCA. This might translate into differences regarding the optimal cut-off score to detect possible cognitive impairment. Thus, when solely relying on a cut-off score that has been validated in a population of AD patients, patients with other diseases leading to cognitive impairment may be missed.
The investigators therefore aim to establish the diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA when applied in a clinically diverse patient sample, namely, a sample that is seen in a typical Memory Clinic. In a first step, the diagnostic properties of the MoCA will be investigated by differentiating between healthy controls and all patients with mild and major neurocognitive disorders (NCD). In a second step, healthy controls will be compared separately to patients with mild NCD and to patients with major NCD. The investigators further aim to investigate the aptness of the MoCA for differential diagnostic. The MoCA performance of different diagnostic patient groups will be compared. Investigating the presence or absence of deficits per subitem in each patient group may reveal if different etiologies lead to characteristic MoCA profiles.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
BS
-
Basel, BS, 스위스, 4002
- Memory Clinic, University Center for Medicine of Aging, Felix Platter Hospital Basel
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
샘플링 방법
연구 인구
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 65 years.
- Education ≥ 7 years.
- Fluency in the German language.
- Completed neuropsychological assessment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe sensory or motor impairment interfering with cognitive testing.
- Documented refusal of the use of health-related personal data.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score
기간: Administered once at baseline
|
Performance on the MoCA (0-30; higher score indicates better performance)
|
Administered once at baseline
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score
기간: Administered once at baseline
|
Performance on the MMSE (0-30; higher score indicates better performance)
|
Administered once at baseline
|
|
Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease - Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-NAB)
기간: Administered once at baseline
|
CERAD-NAB total score (0-120; higher score indicates better performance)
|
Administered once at baseline
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
스폰서
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Andreas Monsch, PhD, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .