Validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients With Mild and Major Neurocognitive Disorder (MoCA-Valid)

June 26, 2018 updated by: Andreas Monsch

The primary aim of our study is to investigate the specificity, the sensitivity, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA for mild and major NCD in a German-speaking population.

Secondary aims are: (1) to study the MoCA performance in different patient groups and (2) to compare the diagnostic properties of the MoCA with the ones of the MMSE (i.e., the current reference standard for screening of MCI).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Due to the demographical development, age-related diseases will drastically increase over the next decades. To face this healthcare challenge, early and accurate identification of cognitive impairment is crucial. The early detection of cognitive decline requires a tool that is short, easy to administer and interpret, and has high diagnostic accuracy. Currently, a widely used instrument is the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). However, the MMSE sensitivity is poor when identifying individuals with MCI, and it lacks meaningful assessment of executive functions. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been developed to address these weaknesses. It has demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy in patients with MCI, has less ceiling effect, and a higher test-retest-reliability. In addition, the MoCA better captures the cognitive domains proposed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

In 2018, the investigators generated demographically adjusted normative values for the German version of the MoCA in cognitively healthy individuals. However, these normative data alone are not suitable to determine the exact diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, the investigators aim to analyze data from patients with cognitive disorders to validate the German version of the MoCA.

Validation studies for the MoCA have been performed in various languages and different etiologies, mainly in patients with MCI and AD. However, when applying the MoCA in a clinical routine setting, the patient population is more heterogeneous and different etiologies may lead to deficits in characteristic cognitive domains. Therefore, patients with diseases other than AD may perform differently on items of the MoCA. This might translate into differences regarding the optimal cut-off score to detect possible cognitive impairment. Thus, when solely relying on a cut-off score that has been validated in a population of AD patients, patients with other diseases leading to cognitive impairment may be missed.

The investigators therefore aim to establish the diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA when applied in a clinically diverse patient sample, namely, a sample that is seen in a typical Memory Clinic. In a first step, the diagnostic properties of the MoCA will be investigated by differentiating between healthy controls and all patients with mild and major neurocognitive disorders (NCD). In a second step, healthy controls will be compared separately to patients with mild NCD and to patients with major NCD. The investigators further aim to investigate the aptness of the MoCA for differential diagnostic. The MoCA performance of different diagnostic patient groups will be compared. Investigating the presence or absence of deficits per subitem in each patient group may reveal if different etiologies lead to characteristic MoCA profiles.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

430

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BS
      • Basel, BS, Switzerland, 4002
        • Memory Clinic, University Center for Medicine of Aging, Felix Platter Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing the routinely held neuropsychological assessments in the Memory Clinic, University Center for Medicine of Aging, Felix Platter Hospital in Basel, Switzerland.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65 years.
  • Education ≥ 7 years.
  • Fluency in the German language.
  • Completed neuropsychological assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe sensory or motor impairment interfering with cognitive testing.
  • Documented refusal of the use of health-related personal data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score
Time Frame: Administered once at baseline
Performance on the MoCA (0-30; higher score indicates better performance)
Administered once at baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score
Time Frame: Administered once at baseline
Performance on the MMSE (0-30; higher score indicates better performance)
Administered once at baseline
Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease - Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-NAB)
Time Frame: Administered once at baseline
CERAD-NAB total score (0-120; higher score indicates better performance)
Administered once at baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreas Monsch, PhD, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 8, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Subscribe