- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03581643
Validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients With Mild and Major Neurocognitive Disorder (MoCA-Valid)
The primary aim of our study is to investigate the specificity, the sensitivity, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA for mild and major NCD in a German-speaking population.
Secondary aims are: (1) to study the MoCA performance in different patient groups and (2) to compare the diagnostic properties of the MoCA with the ones of the MMSE (i.e., the current reference standard for screening of MCI).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Due to the demographical development, age-related diseases will drastically increase over the next decades. To face this healthcare challenge, early and accurate identification of cognitive impairment is crucial. The early detection of cognitive decline requires a tool that is short, easy to administer and interpret, and has high diagnostic accuracy. Currently, a widely used instrument is the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). However, the MMSE sensitivity is poor when identifying individuals with MCI, and it lacks meaningful assessment of executive functions. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been developed to address these weaknesses. It has demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy in patients with MCI, has less ceiling effect, and a higher test-retest-reliability. In addition, the MoCA better captures the cognitive domains proposed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).
In 2018, the investigators generated demographically adjusted normative values for the German version of the MoCA in cognitively healthy individuals. However, these normative data alone are not suitable to determine the exact diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, the investigators aim to analyze data from patients with cognitive disorders to validate the German version of the MoCA.
Validation studies for the MoCA have been performed in various languages and different etiologies, mainly in patients with MCI and AD. However, when applying the MoCA in a clinical routine setting, the patient population is more heterogeneous and different etiologies may lead to deficits in characteristic cognitive domains. Therefore, patients with diseases other than AD may perform differently on items of the MoCA. This might translate into differences regarding the optimal cut-off score to detect possible cognitive impairment. Thus, when solely relying on a cut-off score that has been validated in a population of AD patients, patients with other diseases leading to cognitive impairment may be missed.
The investigators therefore aim to establish the diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA when applied in a clinically diverse patient sample, namely, a sample that is seen in a typical Memory Clinic. In a first step, the diagnostic properties of the MoCA will be investigated by differentiating between healthy controls and all patients with mild and major neurocognitive disorders (NCD). In a second step, healthy controls will be compared separately to patients with mild NCD and to patients with major NCD. The investigators further aim to investigate the aptness of the MoCA for differential diagnostic. The MoCA performance of different diagnostic patient groups will be compared. Investigating the presence or absence of deficits per subitem in each patient group may reveal if different etiologies lead to characteristic MoCA profiles.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
BS
-
Basel, BS, Switzerland, 4002
- Memory Clinic, University Center for Medicine of Aging, Felix Platter Hospital Basel
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 65 years.
- Education ≥ 7 years.
- Fluency in the German language.
- Completed neuropsychological assessment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe sensory or motor impairment interfering with cognitive testing.
- Documented refusal of the use of health-related personal data.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score
Time Frame: Administered once at baseline
|
Performance on the MoCA (0-30; higher score indicates better performance)
|
Administered once at baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score
Time Frame: Administered once at baseline
|
Performance on the MMSE (0-30; higher score indicates better performance)
|
Administered once at baseline
|
|
Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease - Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-NAB)
Time Frame: Administered once at baseline
|
CERAD-NAB total score (0-120; higher score indicates better performance)
|
Administered once at baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andreas Monsch, PhD, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MoCA-Valid
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease
-
ProgenaBiomeWithdrawnAlzheimer Disease | Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset | Alzheimer Disease, Late Onset | Alzheimer Disease 1 | Alzheimer Disease 2 | Alzheimer Disease 3 | Alzheimer Disease 4 | Alzheimer Disease 7 | Alzheimer Disease 17 | Alzheimer Disease 5 | Alzheimer Disease 6 | Alzheimer Disease 8 | Alzheimer Disease 10 | Alzheimer... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Cognito Therapeutics, Inc.Active, not recruitingCognitive Impairment | Dementia | Alzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitive Decline | Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset | Alzheimer Disease, Late Onset | MCI | Dementia Alzheimers | Mild Dementia | Dementia of Alzheimer Type | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Alzheimer Disease 1 | Dementia, Mild | Alzheimer... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityNot yet recruitingMCI With Increased Risk for Alzheimer Disease | Alzheimer s DiseaseUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesRecruitingAlzheimer Disease | Dementia Alzheimer Type | Alzheimer&Amp;#39;s Disease (AD) | Alzheimer&Amp;Amp;#39;s Disease | Mild Alzheimer&Amp;Amp;#39;s Disease | Moderate Alzheimer&Amp;Amp;#39;s Disease | Alzheimer&Amp;#39;s DementiaUnited States
-
AphiosNot yet recruitingDementia | Alzheimer Disease 1 | Alzheimer Disease 2 | Alzheimer Disease 3
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfNot yet recruitingEarly Onset Alzheimer Disease | Alzheimer Disease (AD)Germany
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Not yet recruiting
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingEnrolling by invitation
-
University Hospital, GrenobleRecruiting
-
Fujian Medical University Union HospitalRecruitingAlzheimer s DiseaseChina