이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

EFFECT OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE DETECTION ON PRESSURE

2021년 11월 19일 업데이트: Alev Genç, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

EFFECT OF TWO DIFFERENT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE DETECTION ON PRESSURE WOUND FORMATION IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

This study was conducted to examine the effect of two different tube detection on pressure wound formation in the intensive care unit. The search was carried out with a total of 60 patients that 30 of 60 them are interventions and 30 of 60 as experiments, who were hospitalized in the anesthesia and reanimation intensive care unit of an Educational Research Hospital. The 60 patients who made up the sample were assigned 2 groups using a computer program that produced random numbers. For the purpose of the study, the groups were encoded as groups A and B, and each group was tested with two different endotracheal tube detection methods which was applied to the patients in the groups. Data from the study were collected using the introductory and clinical features form, the braden pressure wound risk diagnostic scale, the pressure ulcer recovery assessment scale, the international pressure wound staging system, and the eilers oral assessment guide. Patients in both groups were monitored for four days for oral presure injury. During this process, the tube detection of both groups was changed every 24 hours, and the tubes were repositioned every 4 hours. At the end of the fourth day, wound assesments of patients who developed pressure wounds were performed by using the international pressure staging system and the pressure ulcer recovery assessment scale. Relatives of the patients who were scheduled to conduct the study were informed about the study by oral and written and their consent was obtained.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

60

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Istanbul, 칠면조
        • Marmara University Training and Research Hospital

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be between the ages of 18-65
  • Must be intubated oratraceal

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Oral pressure wounds
  • Burns on the face
  • Diabetes
  • Facial and neck trauma

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 방지
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 네 배로

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE HOLDER
Endotracheal tube holder was used for endotracheal tube detection of patients in this group.
During this process, the tube detection of endotracheal tube holder was changed every 24 hours, and the tubes were repositioned every 4 hours. On the first day of the study, the oral mucosa of patients in this group was evaluated by the eliers oral evaluation guide.Then, with the Braden pressure wound risk diagnostic scale, patients ' Pressure Wound risk assessment was performed. Patients in this group were monitored for four days for oral pressure wound as of the day they were intubated. During this process, patients ' tube holder was changed every 24 hours and the tube was repositioned every 4 hours. At the end of the fourth day, wound evaluation of patients who developed pressure wounds was performed using the international pressure wound staging system and pressure ulcer Recovery Assessment Scale. In addition, pressure wounds of patients who developed pressure wounds were treated in accordance with the recommendation of a plastic surgeon.
활성 비교기: BANDAGE
The bandage was used for endotracheal tube detection of patients in this group.
On the first day of the study, the oral mucosa of patients in this group was evaluated by the eliers oral evaluation guide.Then, with the Braden pressure wound risk diagnostic scale, patients ' Pressure Wound risk assessment was performed. Patients in this group were monitored for four days for oral pressure wound as of the day they were intubated. During this process, patients ' tube holder was changed every 24 hours and the tube was repositioned every 4 hours. At the end of the fourth day, wound evaluation of patients who developed pressure wounds was performed using the international pressure wound staging system and pressure ulcer Recovery Assessment Scale.In addition, pressure wounds of patients who developed pressure wounds were treated in accordance with the recommendation of a plastic surgeon.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
BANDAGE
기간: At the end of the 4th day, the wound evaluation of the patients who developed pressure ulcers was made with the International Staging System for Pressure Injuries and The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.
It was determined that the bandage method was better than the ETT method in terms of both the pressure ulcer risk score difference and the tendency to fall, dislocate or remain stable
At the end of the 4th day, the wound evaluation of the patients who developed pressure ulcers was made with the International Staging System for Pressure Injuries and The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.
ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE HOLDER
기간: At the end of the 4th day, the wound evaluation of the patients who developed pressure ulcers was made with the International Staging System for Pressure Injuries and The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.
It was determined that the bandage method was better than the ETT method in terms of both the pressure ulcer risk score difference and the tendency to fall, dislocate or remain stable
At the end of the 4th day, the wound evaluation of the patients who developed pressure ulcers was made with the International Staging System for Pressure Injuries and The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: TÜLİN YILDIZ, PhD, Namik Kemal University

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2020년 7월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2020년 11월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2020년 11월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2021년 3월 30일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2021년 11월 19일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 12월 2일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 12월 2일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2021년 11월 19일

마지막으로 확인됨

2021년 11월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • Marmara EAH-ALEV GENÇ

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

미국에서 제조되어 미국에서 수출되는 제품

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다