Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

EFFECT OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE DETECTION ON PRESSURE

19 november 2021 bijgewerkt door: Alev Genç, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

EFFECT OF TWO DIFFERENT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE DETECTION ON PRESSURE WOUND FORMATION IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

This study was conducted to examine the effect of two different tube detection on pressure wound formation in the intensive care unit. The search was carried out with a total of 60 patients that 30 of 60 them are interventions and 30 of 60 as experiments, who were hospitalized in the anesthesia and reanimation intensive care unit of an Educational Research Hospital. The 60 patients who made up the sample were assigned 2 groups using a computer program that produced random numbers. For the purpose of the study, the groups were encoded as groups A and B, and each group was tested with two different endotracheal tube detection methods which was applied to the patients in the groups. Data from the study were collected using the introductory and clinical features form, the braden pressure wound risk diagnostic scale, the pressure ulcer recovery assessment scale, the international pressure wound staging system, and the eilers oral assessment guide. Patients in both groups were monitored for four days for oral presure injury. During this process, the tube detection of both groups was changed every 24 hours, and the tubes were repositioned every 4 hours. At the end of the fourth day, wound assesments of patients who developed pressure wounds were performed by using the international pressure staging system and the pressure ulcer recovery assessment scale. Relatives of the patients who were scheduled to conduct the study were informed about the study by oral and written and their consent was obtained.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

60

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

      • Istanbul, Kalkoen
        • Marmara University Training and Research Hospital

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar tot 65 jaar (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be between the ages of 18-65
  • Must be intubated oratraceal

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Oral pressure wounds
  • Burns on the face
  • Diabetes
  • Facial and neck trauma

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Preventie
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Verviervoudigen

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE HOLDER
Endotracheal tube holder was used for endotracheal tube detection of patients in this group.
During this process, the tube detection of endotracheal tube holder was changed every 24 hours, and the tubes were repositioned every 4 hours. On the first day of the study, the oral mucosa of patients in this group was evaluated by the eliers oral evaluation guide.Then, with the Braden pressure wound risk diagnostic scale, patients ' Pressure Wound risk assessment was performed. Patients in this group were monitored for four days for oral pressure wound as of the day they were intubated. During this process, patients ' tube holder was changed every 24 hours and the tube was repositioned every 4 hours. At the end of the fourth day, wound evaluation of patients who developed pressure wounds was performed using the international pressure wound staging system and pressure ulcer Recovery Assessment Scale. In addition, pressure wounds of patients who developed pressure wounds were treated in accordance with the recommendation of a plastic surgeon.
Actieve vergelijker: BANDAGE
The bandage was used for endotracheal tube detection of patients in this group.
On the first day of the study, the oral mucosa of patients in this group was evaluated by the eliers oral evaluation guide.Then, with the Braden pressure wound risk diagnostic scale, patients ' Pressure Wound risk assessment was performed. Patients in this group were monitored for four days for oral pressure wound as of the day they were intubated. During this process, patients ' tube holder was changed every 24 hours and the tube was repositioned every 4 hours. At the end of the fourth day, wound evaluation of patients who developed pressure wounds was performed using the international pressure wound staging system and pressure ulcer Recovery Assessment Scale.In addition, pressure wounds of patients who developed pressure wounds were treated in accordance with the recommendation of a plastic surgeon.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
BANDAGE
Tijdsspanne: At the end of the 4th day, the wound evaluation of the patients who developed pressure ulcers was made with the International Staging System for Pressure Injuries and The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.
It was determined that the bandage method was better than the ETT method in terms of both the pressure ulcer risk score difference and the tendency to fall, dislocate or remain stable
At the end of the 4th day, the wound evaluation of the patients who developed pressure ulcers was made with the International Staging System for Pressure Injuries and The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.
ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE HOLDER
Tijdsspanne: At the end of the 4th day, the wound evaluation of the patients who developed pressure ulcers was made with the International Staging System for Pressure Injuries and The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.
It was determined that the bandage method was better than the ETT method in terms of both the pressure ulcer risk score difference and the tendency to fall, dislocate or remain stable
At the end of the 4th day, the wound evaluation of the patients who developed pressure ulcers was made with the International Staging System for Pressure Injuries and The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: TÜLİN YILDIZ, PhD, Namik Kemal University

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

1 juli 2020

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 november 2020

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 november 2020

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

30 maart 2021

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

19 november 2021

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

2 december 2021

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

2 december 2021

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

19 november 2021

Laatst geverifieerd

1 november 2021

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • Marmara EAH-ALEV GENÇ

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

Nee

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

product vervaardigd in en geëxporteerd uit de V.S.

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Klinische onderzoeken op Druk letsel

Klinische onderzoeken op ENDOTRAKEAL TUBE HOLDER

3
Abonneren