- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07575295
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Underwater Versus Conventional Preventive Coagulation for Intraprocedural Vessel Management During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) has become an established, minimally invasive therapy for achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. Submucosal tunnelling is a critical phase of POEM and requires meticulous haemostasis to avoid bleeding, loss of orientation, reduced visibility, and prolonged procedural time.
The current standard method of vessel coagulation during POEM involves conventional coagulation under CO₂ insufflation using the hybrid knife (HK). However, this approach can require additional hemostatic devices-most commonly coagulation forceps-particularly when dealing with large-calibre vessels or resistant bleeding.
A novel technique-underwater preventive coagulation-leverages water as a conductive medium. Preliminary evidence suggests that:
- electrosurgical current in water is focalized at the interface of the vessel,
- allowing a soft sealing of the vessel wall,
- reducing the risk of vessel rupture or unintended deep thermal injury,
- and potentially eliminating the need to convert to coagulation forceps. Pilot data from our center demonstrate that underwater prophylactic sealing of large vessels during POEM is feasible, safe, and associated with markedly reduced need for rescue coagulation forceps. The technique is already used in practice but lacks systematic evidence from prospective randomized trials.
This study is designed to provide high-quality evidence on whether underwater vessel coagulation improves haemostatic efficiency, reduces intra-procedural bleeding, and minimizes device changes during POEM.
All POEM procedures will be performed under general anesthesia in the supine position using Fujifilm high-definition gastroscopes with a 2.8 mm channel and transparent distal cap.
Steps (Both Arms)
- Identify the esophagogastric junction (EGJ).
- Inject saline + methylene blue submucosally.
- Create a 2 cm mucosal incision at 5-6 o'clock position, 10 cm above EGJ.
- Enter the submucosal space.
- Perform submucosal tunnelling down to EGJ and 2-3 cm into cardia.
Perform vessel haemostasis according to group allocation:
- Underwater coagulation (intervention)
- CO₂-based conventional coagulation (control)
- Perform circular myotomy (with occasional full-thickness myotomy when indicated).
- Close the mucosal entry using hemostatic clips.
- Record procedure time, instrument exchanges, bleeding events, and forceps usage.
Equipment
- Hybrid Knife (Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH)
- VIO 3 generator + ERBEJet 2 water-jet system
- Methylene-blue tinted saline
- Electrosurgical settings: ENDO CUT Q 2-3-3 for mucosal incision and myotomy
연구 개요
상세 설명
Primary Objective
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:
1. Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and 2. Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation. Secondary Objectives
- To compare composite forceps use (rescue + prophylactic) between groups.
- To evaluate the frequency of prophylactic-only forceps use.
- To compare total number of forceps applications per procedure.
- To determine differences in intra-procedural bleeding episodes.
- To compare procedural efficiency (procedure time, number of instrument exchanges).
- To compare hematological and inflammatory markers (Hb drop, Hct, CRP, WBC).
- To compare delayed bleeding rates within 30 days.
- To evaluate overall complication rates (intra- and post-procedural).
- To assess patient-reported outcomes (pain, tolerability). A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial.
Study Arms Intervention Arm: Underwater Coagulation
- Vessel coagulation performed entirely underwater using the Hybrid Knife.
- SWIFT COAG: E3 (89 W) for POEM.
- Physiological saline instilled to completely displace air around the target vessel.
Control Arm: Conventional Coagulation (CO₂ Setting)
- Standard vessel isolation and coagulation under CO₂ insufflation.
- SWIFT COAG: E3 (89 W) for POEM.
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Rajesh Goud Mr Maragoni, M.Pharm
- 전화번호: 312 04023378888
- 이메일: rajeshgoud761@gmail.com
연구 연락처 백업
- 이름: Zaheer Nabi Dr Mohammed, MD DNB
- 전화번호: 427 04023378888
- 이메일: zaheernabi1978@gmail.com
연구 장소
-
-
Telangana
-
Hyderabad, Telangana, 인도, 500082
- 모병
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospital
-
연락하다:
- Mohan Ramchandani, MBBS
- 전화번호: 802 04023378888
- 이메일: ramchandanimohan@gmail.com
-
연락하다:
- Rajesh Goud Mr Maragoni, M.Pharm MBA
- 전화번호: 301 04023378888
- 이메일: rajeshgoud761@gmail.com
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
샘플링 방법
연구 인구
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosis of achalasia or esophageal motility disorder planned for POEM
- Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anticoagulant or antithrombotic therapy not safely stoppable
- Known coagulopathy or platelet disorder
- Esophageal/gastric varices
- Previous POEM or Heller's myotomy
- Prior treatment for same condition
- Inability or refusal to consent
- Visualized vessels smaller than the HK inner diameter (1.2 mm)
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
코호트 및 개입
그룹/코호트 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
Under Water Coagulation
Intervention Arm: Underwater Coagulation
|
Leverages water as a conductive medium. Preliminary evidence suggests that:
|
|
Conventional Coagulation
Control Arm: Conventional Coagulation (CO₂ Setting)
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:
기간: 60 minutes
|
|
60 minutes
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
To compare composite forceps use (rescue + prophylactic) between groups.
기간: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To evaluate the frequency of prophylactic-only forceps use.
기간: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To compare total number of forceps applications per procedure.
기간: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To determine differences in intra-procedural bleeding episodes
기간: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To compare procedural efficiency (procedure time, number of instrument exchanges
기간: 60 minutes
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
60 minutes
|
|
To compare hematological and inflammatory markers (Hb drop, Hct, CRP, WBC)
기간: 24 hours
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
24 hours
|
|
To compare delayed bleeding rates
기간: 30 days
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
|
30 days
|
|
To evaluate overall complication rates (intra- and post-procedural)
기간: 24 hours
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
24 hours
|
|
To assess patient-reported outcomes (pain, tolerability).
기간: 72 hours
|
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between: 1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation |
72 hours
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 연구 책임자: Mohan Dr Ramchandani, MD DM, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- POEM UWC 2026
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .