Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Underwater Versus Conventional Preventive Coagulation for Intraprocedural Vessel Management During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)

8 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Mohan Ramchandani, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) has become an established, minimally invasive therapy for achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. Submucosal tunnelling is a critical phase of POEM and requires meticulous haemostasis to avoid bleeding, loss of orientation, reduced visibility, and prolonged procedural time.

The current standard method of vessel coagulation during POEM involves conventional coagulation under CO₂ insufflation using the hybrid knife (HK). However, this approach can require additional hemostatic devices-most commonly coagulation forceps-particularly when dealing with large-calibre vessels or resistant bleeding.

A novel technique-underwater preventive coagulation-leverages water as a conductive medium. Preliminary evidence suggests that:

  • electrosurgical current in water is focalized at the interface of the vessel,
  • allowing a soft sealing of the vessel wall,
  • reducing the risk of vessel rupture or unintended deep thermal injury,
  • and potentially eliminating the need to convert to coagulation forceps. Pilot data from our center demonstrate that underwater prophylactic sealing of large vessels during POEM is feasible, safe, and associated with markedly reduced need for rescue coagulation forceps. The technique is already used in practice but lacks systematic evidence from prospective randomized trials.

This study is designed to provide high-quality evidence on whether underwater vessel coagulation improves haemostatic efficiency, reduces intra-procedural bleeding, and minimizes device changes during POEM.

All POEM procedures will be performed under general anesthesia in the supine position using Fujifilm high-definition gastroscopes with a 2.8 mm channel and transparent distal cap.

Steps (Both Arms)

  1. Identify the esophagogastric junction (EGJ).
  2. Inject saline + methylene blue submucosally.
  3. Create a 2 cm mucosal incision at 5-6 o'clock position, 10 cm above EGJ.
  4. Enter the submucosal space.
  5. Perform submucosal tunnelling down to EGJ and 2-3 cm into cardia.

  6. Perform vessel haemostasis according to group allocation:

    • Underwater coagulation (intervention)
    • CO₂-based conventional coagulation (control)
  7. Perform circular myotomy (with occasional full-thickness myotomy when indicated).
  8. Close the mucosal entry using hemostatic clips.
  9. Record procedure time, instrument exchanges, bleeding events, and forceps usage.

Equipment

  • Hybrid Knife (Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH)
  • VIO 3 generator + ERBEJet 2 water-jet system
  • Methylene-blue tinted saline
  • Electrosurgical settings: ENDO CUT Q 2-3-3 for mucosal incision and myotomy

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Primary Objective

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1. Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and 2. Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation. Secondary Objectives

  1. To compare composite forceps use (rescue + prophylactic) between groups.
  2. To evaluate the frequency of prophylactic-only forceps use.
  3. To compare total number of forceps applications per procedure.
  4. To determine differences in intra-procedural bleeding episodes.
  5. To compare procedural efficiency (procedure time, number of instrument exchanges).
  6. To compare hematological and inflammatory markers (Hb drop, Hct, CRP, WBC).
  7. To compare delayed bleeding rates within 30 days.
  8. To evaluate overall complication rates (intra- and post-procedural).
  9. To assess patient-reported outcomes (pain, tolerability). A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial.

Study Arms Intervention Arm: Underwater Coagulation

  • Vessel coagulation performed entirely underwater using the Hybrid Knife.
  • SWIFT COAG: E3 (89 W) for POEM.
  • Physiological saline instilled to completely displace air around the target vessel.

Control Arm: Conventional Coagulation (CO₂ Setting)

  • Standard vessel isolation and coagulation under CO₂ insufflation.
  • SWIFT COAG: E3 (89 W) for POEM.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

120

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • Inde
    • Telangana
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, Inde, 500082
        • Recrutement
        • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon de probabilité

Population étudiée

120 (60 in each arm)

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Diagnosis of achalasia or esophageal motility disorder planned for POEM
  3. Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anticoagulant or antithrombotic therapy not safely stoppable
  2. Known coagulopathy or platelet disorder
  3. Esophageal/gastric varices
  4. Previous POEM or Heller's myotomy
  5. Prior treatment for same condition
  6. Inability or refusal to consent
  7. Visualized vessels smaller than the HK inner diameter (1.2 mm)

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
Under Water Coagulation

Intervention Arm: Underwater Coagulation

  • Vessel coagulation performed entirely underwater using the Hybrid Knife.
  • SWIFT COAG: E3 (89 W) for POEM.
  • Physiological saline instilled to completely displace air around the target vessel.
Autre: Under Water Preventive Coagulation

Leverages water as a conductive medium. Preliminary evidence suggests that:

  1. electrosurgical current in water is focalized at the interface of the vessel,
  2. allowing a soft sealing of the vessel wall,
  3. reducing the risk of vessel rupture or unintended deep thermal injury,
  4. and potentially eliminating the need to convert to coagulation forceps.
Conventional Coagulation

Control Arm: Conventional Coagulation (CO₂ Setting)

  • Standard vessel isolation and coagulation under CO₂ insufflation.
  • SWIFT COAG: E3 (89 W) for POEM.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:
Délai: 60 minutes
  1. Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and
  2. Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation.
60 minutes

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
To compare composite forceps use (rescue + prophylactic) between groups.
Délai: 60 minutes

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
60 minutes
To evaluate the frequency of prophylactic-only forceps use.
Délai: 60 minutes

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
60 minutes
To compare total number of forceps applications per procedure.
Délai: 60 minutes

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
60 minutes
To determine differences in intra-procedural bleeding episodes
Délai: 60 minutes

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
60 minutes
To compare procedural efficiency (procedure time, number of instrument exchanges
Délai: 60 minutes

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
60 minutes
To compare hematological and inflammatory markers (Hb drop, Hct, CRP, WBC)
Délai: 24 hours

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
24 hours
To compare delayed bleeding rates
Délai: 30 days
To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
30 days
To evaluate overall complication rates (intra- and post-procedural)
Délai: 24 hours

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
24 hours
To assess patient-reported outcomes (pain, tolerability).
Délai: 72 hours

To compare the proportion of POEM patients requiring rescue haemostasis with coagulation forceps (for active bleeding) between:

1.Underwater preventive vessel coagulation, and Conventional vessel coagulation under CO₂ insufflation
72 hours

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Mohan Dr Ramchandani, MD DM, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 février 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

10 mai 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 décembre 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

4 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

4 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

8 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

12 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

8 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • POEM UWC 2026

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner