- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07615647
How Video Game Therapy Affects Thinking and Emotions in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment
COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE-MOTIVATIONAL EFFECTS OF A THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION USING THE GOLDEN GAMERS METHODOLOGY IN OLDER ADULTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
Golden Gamers Go is running a study together with Rey Juan Carlos University to better understand how videogames can help older adults, especially those with memory problems or cognitive decline.
The study takes place in real care settings, such as day centers, and involves around 45 older participants. Over two months (with a possible follow-up period), participants take part in two to three sessions per week using video games on PlayStation.
These are not special "health games," but popular, commercial video games that have been carefully selected and adapted to be easy to use, enjoyable, and meaningful for older adults.
The goal is to see whether playing these games can help improve thinking abilities and also how participants feel during the activity - for example, if they are more engaged, motivated, or emotionally positive.
This study builds on previous experience where this approach has already shown promising results in increasing participation, motivation, and overall wellbeing.
By carrying out this research, Golden Gamers Go aim to better understand how meaningful and enjoyable activities like videogames can support healthier and more active aging.
연구 개요
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: ALEJANDRO MORILLAS TÉLLEZ, Master
- 전화번호: +34635268124
- 이메일: goldengamersmanagers@gmail.com
연구 연락처 백업
- 이름: Gloria Sánchez-Carnerero Casas
- 이메일: gsccto@gmail.com
연구 장소
-
-
Madrid
-
Madrid, Madrid, 스페인, 28030
- 모병
- Neurovida
-
연락하다:
- ALEJANDRO TÉLLEZ
- 전화번호: 635268124
- 이메일: morillasfhr@gmail.com
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older adults with mild to moderate cognitive impairment, able to connect with their environment and participate in group or individual activities, and who agree to take part in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cognitive impairment with lack of environmental awareness, serious visual limitations that prevent interaction, or any condition causing distress or making participation unsafe.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Experimental group
The experimental group will receive intervention through conventional videogames
|
Therapy sessions are carried out in small groups using adapted comercial videogames. Each session begins with a simple introduction, followed by gameplay with continuous support. Participants can engage in different ways (playing, assisting, or observing), depending on their needs. Sessions end with a short group reflection, and professionals record participation and responses to guide future sessions. There a lot of unique aspects for this approach. First, the use of comercial videogames for therapy, instead of serious games. Therefore, the whole process is guided by the Golden Gamers Methodology, specialiced in cognitive accesibility. The combination of this kind of videogames, with this adaptations in a senior population with cognitive impairment is totally different from other studies. |
|
활성 비교기: Control group
Control group will receive a special talk about the uses of conventional videogames
|
This masterclass sessions are carried out in small groups. It talks about the use of certain videogames and VR devices for improving the health of the participants. Each session begins with a simple introduction, and end with a short group reflection, and professionals record participation and responses to guide future sessions. The vidoegames that will be described and shown for the users experience are some that have a high degree of accesibility from the Golden Gamers Methodology perspective.
다른 이름들:
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
기간: General perception of the person's cognitive sphere (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
|
Measures overall cognitive function (memory, attention, language, orientation, etc.).
The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points.
Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
The standard administration guidance states that 26/30 or above is generally considered within the normal range, although cut-off points may vary depending on population, education level, age and clinical context.
|
General perception of the person's cognitive sphere (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
|
|
Observed Emotion Rating Scale (OERS)
기간: Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
|
Measures emotional state during the sessions (positive and negative emotions observed).The OERS measures the intensity or duration of these affective states using a 5-point Likert-type scale. Each emotional state is rated separately, usually from 1 to 5. A higher score in pleasure is positive. A higher score in general alertness is usually positive or activation-related. Higher scores in anger, anxiety/fear or sadness indicate more negative affect. |
Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
|
|
Menorah Park Engagement Scale (MPES)
기간: Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
|
The adapted MPES assesses participant engagement during the activity using a 5-point duration scale aligned with the OERS.
Observation takes place during the central 10 minutes of the session, from minute 15 to minute 25, to avoid start-up or fatigue bias.
Each engagement category is scored according to the total accumulated time observed: 1 means the behaviour was never observed; 2 indicates a very brief occurrence; 3 indicates a short occurrence; 4 means the behaviour was observed for 1 to 5 minutes; and 5 means it was observed for more than 5 minutes.
The categories assessed are constructive engagement, passive engagement, social engagement, non-engagement and self-engagement.
If two behaviours occur at the same time, constructive engagement is prioritised.
|
Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
|
|
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD, proxy version)
기간: General perception of the person's recent overall wellbeing (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
|
The QoL-AD proxy version assesses perceived quality of life in people with cognitive impairment through the judgement of a caregiver, professional or informant who knows the participant well.
It includes 13 items, each scored on a 4-point scale: 1 means poor, 2 means fair, 3 means good and 4 means excellent.
The total score is obtained by adding the 13 item scores, giving a possible range from 13 to 52 points.
Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life.
|
General perception of the person's recent overall wellbeing (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 연구 의자: Cristina García Bravo, PhD, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
Therapy with videogames에 대한 임상 시험
-
Riphah International University아직 모집하지 않음
-
Johns Hopkins University아직 모집하지 않음
-
Baskent University아직 모집하지 않음경요도 절제술(TUR) 증후군
-
Foundation University Islamabad모병