How Video Game Therapy Affects Thinking and Emotions in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment
COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE-MOTIVATIONAL EFFECTS OF A THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION USING THE GOLDEN GAMERS METHODOLOGY IN OLDER ADULTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
Golden Gamers Go is running a study together with Rey Juan Carlos University to better understand how videogames can help older adults, especially those with memory problems or cognitive decline.
The study takes place in real care settings, such as day centers, and involves around 45 older participants. Over two months (with a possible follow-up period), participants take part in two to three sessions per week using video games on PlayStation.
These are not special "health games," but popular, commercial video games that have been carefully selected and adapted to be easy to use, enjoyable, and meaningful for older adults.
The goal is to see whether playing these games can help improve thinking abilities and also how participants feel during the activity - for example, if they are more engaged, motivated, or emotionally positive.
This study builds on previous experience where this approach has already shown promising results in increasing participation, motivation, and overall wellbeing.
By carrying out this research, Golden Gamers Go aim to better understand how meaningful and enjoyable activities like videogames can support healthier and more active aging.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Madrid
-
Madrid、Madrid、西班牙、28030
- Neurovida
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older adults with mild to moderate cognitive impairment, able to connect with their environment and participate in group or individual activities, and who agree to take part in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cognitive impairment with lack of environmental awareness, serious visual limitations that prevent interaction, or any condition causing distress or making participation unsafe.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Experimental group
The experimental group will receive intervention through conventional videogames
|
Therapy sessions are carried out in small groups using adapted comercial videogames. Each session begins with a simple introduction, followed by gameplay with continuous support. Participants can engage in different ways (playing, assisting, or observing), depending on their needs. Sessions end with a short group reflection, and professionals record participation and responses to guide future sessions. There a lot of unique aspects for this approach. First, the use of comercial videogames for therapy, instead of serious games. Therefore, the whole process is guided by the Golden Gamers Methodology, specialiced in cognitive accesibility. The combination of this kind of videogames, with this adaptations in a senior population with cognitive impairment is totally different from other studies. |
|
有源比较器:Control group
Control group will receive a special talk about the uses of conventional videogames
|
This masterclass sessions are carried out in small groups. It talks about the use of certain videogames and VR devices for improving the health of the participants. Each session begins with a simple introduction, and end with a short group reflection, and professionals record participation and responses to guide future sessions. The vidoegames that will be described and shown for the users experience are some that have a high degree of accesibility from the Golden Gamers Methodology perspective.
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
大体时间:General perception of the person's cognitive sphere (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
|
Measures overall cognitive function (memory, attention, language, orientation, etc.).
The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points.
Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
The standard administration guidance states that 26/30 or above is generally considered within the normal range, although cut-off points may vary depending on population, education level, age and clinical context.
|
General perception of the person's cognitive sphere (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
|
|
Observed Emotion Rating Scale (OERS)
大体时间:Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
|
Measures emotional state during the sessions (positive and negative emotions observed).The OERS measures the intensity or duration of these affective states using a 5-point Likert-type scale. Each emotional state is rated separately, usually from 1 to 5. A higher score in pleasure is positive. A higher score in general alertness is usually positive or activation-related. Higher scores in anger, anxiety/fear or sadness indicate more negative affect. |
Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
|
|
Menorah Park Engagement Scale (MPES)
大体时间:Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
|
The adapted MPES assesses participant engagement during the activity using a 5-point duration scale aligned with the OERS.
Observation takes place during the central 10 minutes of the session, from minute 15 to minute 25, to avoid start-up or fatigue bias.
Each engagement category is scored according to the total accumulated time observed: 1 means the behaviour was never observed; 2 indicates a very brief occurrence; 3 indicates a short occurrence; 4 means the behaviour was observed for 1 to 5 minutes; and 5 means it was observed for more than 5 minutes.
The categories assessed are constructive engagement, passive engagement, social engagement, non-engagement and self-engagement.
If two behaviours occur at the same time, constructive engagement is prioritised.
|
Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
|
|
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD, proxy version)
大体时间:General perception of the person's recent overall wellbeing (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
|
The QoL-AD proxy version assesses perceived quality of life in people with cognitive impairment through the judgement of a caregiver, professional or informant who knows the participant well.
It includes 13 items, each scored on a 4-point scale: 1 means poor, 2 means fair, 3 means good and 4 means excellent.
The total score is obtained by adding the 13 item scores, giving a possible range from 13 to 52 points.
Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life.
|
General perception of the person's recent overall wellbeing (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 学习椅:Cristina García Bravo, PhD、Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.