Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

How Video Game Therapy Affects Thinking and Emotions in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment

28 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Golden Gamers Go SL

COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE-MOTIVATIONAL EFFECTS OF A THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION USING THE GOLDEN GAMERS METHODOLOGY IN OLDER ADULTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

Golden Gamers Go is running a study together with Rey Juan Carlos University to better understand how videogames can help older adults, especially those with memory problems or cognitive decline.

The study takes place in real care settings, such as day centers, and involves around 45 older participants. Over two months (with a possible follow-up period), participants take part in two to three sessions per week using video games on PlayStation.

These are not special "health games," but popular, commercial video games that have been carefully selected and adapted to be easy to use, enjoyable, and meaningful for older adults.

The goal is to see whether playing these games can help improve thinking abilities and also how participants feel during the activity - for example, if they are more engaged, motivated, or emotionally positive.

This study builds on previous experience where this approach has already shown promising results in increasing participation, motivation, and overall wellbeing.

By carrying out this research, Golden Gamers Go aim to better understand how meaningful and enjoyable activities like videogames can support healthier and more active aging.

Visão geral do estudo

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

60

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Espanha, 28030
        • Recrutamento
        • Neurovida
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults with mild to moderate cognitive impairment, able to connect with their environment and participate in group or individual activities, and who agree to take part in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment with lack of environmental awareness, serious visual limitations that prevent interaction, or any condition causing distress or making participation unsafe.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Experimental group
The experimental group will receive intervention through conventional videogames

Therapy sessions are carried out in small groups using adapted comercial videogames.

Each session begins with a simple introduction, followed by gameplay with continuous support. Participants can engage in different ways (playing, assisting, or observing), depending on their needs. Sessions end with a short group reflection, and professionals record participation and responses to guide future sessions.

There a lot of unique aspects for this approach. First, the use of comercial videogames for therapy, instead of serious games. Therefore, the whole process is guided by the Golden Gamers Methodology, specialiced in cognitive accesibility. The combination of this kind of videogames, with this adaptations in a senior population with cognitive impairment is totally different from other studies.

Comparador Ativo: Control group
Control group will receive a special talk about the uses of conventional videogames

This masterclass sessions are carried out in small groups. It talks about the use of certain videogames and VR devices for improving the health of the participants.

Each session begins with a simple introduction, and end with a short group reflection, and professionals record participation and responses to guide future sessions.

The vidoegames that will be described and shown for the users experience are some that have a high degree of accesibility from the Golden Gamers Methodology perspective.

Outros nomes:
  • Golden Gamers Methodology

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Prazo: General perception of the person's cognitive sphere (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
Measures overall cognitive function (memory, attention, language, orientation, etc.). The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. The standard administration guidance states that 26/30 or above is generally considered within the normal range, although cut-off points may vary depending on population, education level, age and clinical context.
General perception of the person's cognitive sphere (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
Observed Emotion Rating Scale (OERS)
Prazo: Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)

Measures emotional state during the sessions (positive and negative emotions observed).The OERS measures the intensity or duration of these affective states using a 5-point Likert-type scale. Each emotional state is rated separately, usually from 1 to 5.

A higher score in pleasure is positive. A higher score in general alertness is usually positive or activation-related. Higher scores in anger, anxiety/fear or sadness indicate more negative affect.

Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
Menorah Park Engagement Scale (MPES)
Prazo: Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
The adapted MPES assesses participant engagement during the activity using a 5-point duration scale aligned with the OERS. Observation takes place during the central 10 minutes of the session, from minute 15 to minute 25, to avoid start-up or fatigue bias. Each engagement category is scored according to the total accumulated time observed: 1 means the behaviour was never observed; 2 indicates a very brief occurrence; 3 indicates a short occurrence; 4 means the behaviour was observed for 1 to 5 minutes; and 5 means it was observed for more than 5 minutes. The categories assessed are constructive engagement, passive engagement, social engagement, non-engagement and self-engagement. If two behaviours occur at the same time, constructive engagement is prioritised.
Pre-intervention and post-intervention (up to 1 week)
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD, proxy version)
Prazo: General perception of the person's recent overall wellbeing (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).
The QoL-AD proxy version assesses perceived quality of life in people with cognitive impairment through the judgement of a caregiver, professional or informant who knows the participant well. It includes 13 items, each scored on a 4-point scale: 1 means poor, 2 means fair, 3 means good and 4 means excellent. The total score is obtained by adding the 13 item scores, giving a possible range from 13 to 52 points. Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life.
General perception of the person's recent overall wellbeing (not session-specific), used at week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (post-intervention).

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Cadeira de estudo: Cristina García Bravo, PhD, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

13 de abril de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

15 de junho de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

6 de julho de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

27 de março de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

28 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

29 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

29 de maio de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

28 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 100220261372026

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em Therapy with videogames

Se inscrever