- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07679698
Self-Directed Learning for Pulmonary Ultrasound Education
"Scaling Up Ultrasound Education Without Scaling Up Tutors: A Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial of Self-Directed Learning for Pulmonary Pathology Recognition"
This study compared two ways of teaching medical students how to recognize lung conditions using ultrasound images.
All participants were third-year medical students taking part in a structured ultrasound training session at the University of Turin. Students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group learned lung ultrasound pathology recognition with direct guidance from a tutor. The other group used a self-directed digital learning tool called MEDQUIZ, which allowed students to review clinical cases and ultrasound videos independently.
The main goal of the study was to determine whether self-directed learning was equivalent to tutor-guided instruction for recognizing pulmonary ultrasound findings. Students completed ultrasound image-based assessments before and after the training. The assessments evaluated their ability to recognize anatomical structures, distinguish normal from abnormal findings, and identify specific lung conditions such as pneumonia, pleural effusion, interstitial syndrome, and pneumothorax.
The study also evaluated student satisfaction with the learning experience.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
This was a single-center, randomized, controlled equivalence trial conducted at the SimTO Advanced Medical Simulation Center, University of Turin, Italy. The study included third-year medical students enrolled in the curricular "Approach to Ultrasound" internship.
Before the in-person training session, all students completed online instructional materials on thoracic and abdominal ultrasound. During the internship, students participated in a structured two-hour ultrasound training session composed of four 30-minute stations. The stations included hands-on scanning of healthy volunteers and case-based pathology recognition activities.
At the thoracic pathology station, students were randomly assigned to either tutor-guided learning or self-directed learning. In the tutor-guided group, students worked through pulmonary ultrasound cases with direct supervision, clinical reasoning guidance, and feedback from a tutor. In the self-directed learning group, students used MEDQUIZ, a purpose-built digital learning tool that presented clinical cases, patient information, and lung ultrasound video clips in an interactive format.
The primary outcomes were based on pre-training and post-training assessments using ultrasound video cases. Students were assessed on three levels of competency: recognition of the anatomical structure shown in the ultrasound clip, classification of the finding as physiological or pathological, and identification of the specific pulmonary condition when a pathological finding was present. An overall case resolution score was also calculated.
Secondary outcomes included student satisfaction with the simulation-based learning experience, assessed at the end of the internship.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Italy
-
Turin, Italy, 이탈리아, 10126
- Advanced Medical Simulation Center- SimTO, School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 어린이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Third-year medical students enrolled in the "Approach to Ultrasound" curricular internship at the University of Turin
- Limited or no prior ultrasound experience
- No previous formal specialized ultrasound training
- Provision of informed consent for data collection
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to attend the complete ultrasound training session and both assessment sessions
- Physical or medical conditions limiting participation in hands-on ultrasound practice
- Refusal to provide informed consent for data collection
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
활성 비교기: Tutor-Guided Learning
Participants assigned to this arm completed the thoracic pathology recognition station with direct tutor guidance.
During the session, students reviewed pulmonary ultrasound cases through structured case-based learning, received real-time clinical reasoning guidance, and were provided with immediate corrective feedback by a trained tutor.
All other components of the ultrasound internship were identical to those completed by the self-directed learning group.
|
Participants completed the thoracic pathology recognition station with direct tutor guidance.
During the 30-minute station, students reviewed pulmonary ultrasound cases through structured case-based learning, received real-time clinical reasoning guidance, and were provided with immediate corrective feedback by a trained tutor.
|
|
실험적: Self-Directed Learning
Participants assigned to this arm completed the thoracic pathology recognition station using MEDQUIZ, a purpose-built self-directed digital learning tool.
Students independently reviewed clinical cases, patient information, and pulmonary ultrasound video clips without structured tutor guidance.
The tool included learning materials that remained available during the session.
All other components of the ultrasound internship were identical to those completed by the tutor-guided learning group.
|
Participants used MEDQUIZ, a purpose-built digital learning tool, to complete the thoracic pathology recognition station independently.
The tool presented clinical cases, patient information, learning materials, and pulmonary ultrasound video clips.
Students reviewed the cases and answered independently without structured tutor guidance during the 30-minute station.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Anatomical Structure Recognition Accuracy
기간: Immediately before and immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
Percentage of pulmonary ultrasound cases in which participants correctly identified the anatomical structure shown in the ultrasound video clip.
|
Immediately before and immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
|
Physiological Versus Pathological Discrimination Accuracy
기간: Immediately before and immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
Percentage of pulmonary ultrasound cases in which participants correctly classified the ultrasound finding as physiological or pathological.
|
Immediately before and immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
|
Pulmonary Pathology Identification Accuracy
기간: Immediately before and immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
Percentage of pathological pulmonary ultrasound cases in which participants correctly identified the specific pulmonary condition shown in the ultrasound video clip, including pneumonia or consolidation, interstitial syndrome, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax.
|
Immediately before and immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
|
Overall Pulmonary Ultrasound Case Resolution Score
기간: Immediately before and immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
Percentage of pulmonary ultrasound cases correctly resolved with the maximum score.
A case was considered correctly resolved when the participant correctly identified the anatomical structure, correctly classified the finding as physiological or pathological, and, where applicable, correctly identified the specific pulmonary pathology.
|
Immediately before and immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Student Satisfaction With the Simulation Experience
기간: Immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
Student satisfaction with the ultrasound training experience will be assessed after the session using the Italian version of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale.
This scale includes 18 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 to 5. The total score ranges from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the simulation-based learning experience.
Three subscale scores will also be calculated: Debriefing and Reflection, ranging from 9 to 45; Clinical Reasoning, ranging from 5 to 25; and Clinical Learning, ranging from 4 to 20.
For all subscales, higher scores indicate a better outcome, corresponding to greater satisfaction in the specific domain.
|
Immediately after the 3-hour ultrasound training session
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 연구 책임자: Alberto Milan, PhD, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
Tutor-Guided Learning에 대한 임상 시험
-
Klein Buendel, Inc.National Institute on Aging (NIA); Penn State University완전한
-
Xijing Hospital초대로 등록
-
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de...아직 모집하지 않음전립선암(전립선 절제술 후)
-
Chang Gung University of Science and Technology아직 모집하지 않음
-
Second Military Medical University완전한Transillumination-guided Fiberoptic Intubation 삽관법중국