Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Application of the Four-Dimensional Driven Teaching Model (Version 3) to Anesthesia Training

27 juli 2026 bijgewerkt door: Cui yanghai, China International Neuroscience Institution

Application of the Four-Dimensional Driven Teaching Model (Version 3) to Anesthesia Training: A Multicenter Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the "Visual-Auditory-Tactile-Numerical" (VANT) four-dimensional integrated teaching model improves clinical thinking and decision-making skills in second-year anesthesia residents. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the VANT teaching model improve structured clinical thinking scores (measured by the Anesthesia Clinical Thinking Process Scale) compared to traditional teaching methods?
  • Does the VANT teaching model enhance crisis management performance, including accuracy of primary management and critical decision time, in high-fidelity simulation scenarios?
  • Does the VANT teaching model lead to better long-term knowledge retention (at 1 month) and ability to apply learned skills to new clinical situations (at 3 months)? Researchers will compare the VANT four-dimensional integrated teaching group to a traditional structured teaching group to see if the VANT model produces greater improvements in clinical reasoning, crisis response, and knowledge transfer.

Participants will:

  • Complete a 4-week training program (16 credit hours total) in either the VANT group or the traditional teaching group
  • In the VANT group, engage in multisensory immersive learning involving visual displays (physiological curves and brain network animations), auditory case narratives, tactile manikin manipulation with real-time feedback, and numerical modeling using PK/PD simulation software
  • In the control group, participate in traditional structured teaching including theoretical lectures, case discussions, and simulation practice with basic feedback
  • Complete clinical thinking assessments before training, immediately after, and at 1 month and 3 months post-training
  • Participate in a high-fidelity crisis simulation scenario to evaluate real-time decision-making ability
  • Complete questionnaires about their learning experience and cognitive load

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Nog niet aan het werven

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the "Visual-Auditory-Tactile-Numerical" (VANT) four-dimensional integrated teaching model improves clinical thinking and decision-making skills in second-year anesthesia residents. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the VANT teaching model improve structured clinical thinking scores (measured by the Anesthesia Clinical Thinking Process Scale) compared to traditional teaching methods?
  • Does the VANT teaching model enhance crisis management performance, including accuracy of primary management and critical decision time, in high-fidelity simulation scenarios?
  • Does the VANT teaching model lead to better long-term knowledge retention (at 1 month) and ability to apply learned skills to new clinical situations (at 3 months)? Researchers will compare the VANT four-dimensional integrated teaching group to a traditional structured teaching group to see if the VANT model produces greater improvements in clinical reasoning, crisis response, and knowledge transfer.

Participants will:

  • Complete a 4-week training program (16 credit hours total) in either the VANT group or the traditional teaching group
  • In the VANT group, engage in multisensory immersive learning involving visual displays (physiological curves and brain network animations), auditory case narratives, tactile manikin manipulation with real-time feedback, and numerical modeling using PK/PD simulation software
  • In the control group, participate in traditional structured teaching including theoretical lectures, case discussions, and simulation practice with basic feedback
  • Complete clinical thinking assessments before training, immediately after, and at 1 month and 3 months post-training
  • Participate in a high-fidelity crisis simulation scenario to evaluate real-time decision-making ability
  • Complete questionnaires about their learning experience and cognitive load

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Geschat)

40

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Studie Contact Back-up

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Volwassen

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All participants were in their second year of standardized residency training in anesthesiology, had completed basic anesthesia rotations, and possessed fundamental operational skills suitable for advanced clinical thinking training.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unwillingness to complete the full training and assessment protocol

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Dubbele

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: VANT GROUP
(Four-Dimensional Integrated Immersive Teaching): The "Visual-Auditory-Numerical-Tactile" (VANT) four-dimensional driven teaching model was implemented in a dedicated immersive simulation classroom equipped with multimodal teaching devices. The teaching procedure followed the sequential order of the four dimensions: ① Visual Insight. ② Auditory Embedding. ③ Numerical Validation. ④Tactile Interaction
Ander: VANT intervention
(Four-Dimensional Integrated Immersive Teaching): The "Visual-Auditory-Numerical-Tactile" (VANT) four-dimensional driven teaching model was implemented in a dedicated immersive simulation classroom equipped with multimodal teaching devices. The teaching procedure followed the sequential order of the four dimensions: ① Visual Insight. ② Auditory Embedding. ③ Numerical Validation. ④Tactile Interaction
Andere namen:
  • Teaching model intervention
Actieve vergelijker: Control Group
Control Group (Traditional Structured Teaching): This group adopted a structured teaching model consistent with most domestic anesthesia teaching practices, with total credit hours exactly matching the experimental group. The teaching content also centered on the same core case, the organizational format was:①Theoretical Lectures (4 hours).②Case Discussions (6 hours).③Simulation Practice (6 hours). The control group received a structured teaching model consistent with conventional didactic practice in our center, which follows a linear 'theory-discussion-practice' sequence without the integrated multisensory or real-time quantitative feedback loops.
Ander: Traditional Structured Teaching intervention
This group adopted a structured teaching model consistent with most domestic anesthesia teaching practices, with total credit hours exactly matching the experimental group. The teaching content also centered on the same core case, the organizational format was:①Theoretical Lectures (4 hours).②Case Discussions (6 hours).③Simulation Practice (6 hours).

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Assessment of Anesthesia Clinical Thinking Process
Tijdsspanne: pre-teaching (baseline), immediately post-teaching, and one month post-teaching
A modified version of the Anesthesia Clinical Thinking Process Scale (ACTPS), which had been validated for reliability and validity (Cronbach's α = 0.873), was used to evaluate the clinical thinking process before the teaching session, immediately after, and at one month post-teaching. The scale consists of 12 items across four dimensions: breadth of information integration, depth of problem identification, reasonableness of plan generation, and comprehensiveness of expected and alternative plans. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with a total score of 84 converted to a percentage scale.
pre-teaching (baseline), immediately post-teaching, and one month post-teaching

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
High-Fidelity Scenario-Based Assessment：Accuracy rate of the primary response (whether the judgment and initial measures aligned with guidelines/expert consensus);
Tijdsspanne: Immediately post-teaching
High-Fidelity Scenario-Based Assessment：Accuracy rate of the primary response (whether the judgment and initial measures aligned with guidelines/expert consensus);In high-fidelity scenarios, four critical decision points are established based on scenario-triggered events. Each decision point is scored independently according to the criteria below, with no mutual influence among them. The scores from the four decision points are summed to produce the "Integrated Management Competency Score" for the scenario (maximum score: 12 points). The final total score corresponds to a competency tier (e.g., 10-12 = Excellent, 7-9 = Proficient, 4-6 = Basic, 0-3 = Needs Improvement).
Immediately post-teaching
High-Fidelity Scenario-Based Assessment（Second）：Critical decision time (time from scenario start to the first correct intervention)
Tijdsspanne: Immediately post-teaching
High-Fidelity Scenario-Based Assessment（Second）：Critical decision time (time from scenario start to the first correct intervention);Compare the times recorded by the timers in the two groups at the first measurement point.
Immediately post-teaching
Mid- to Long-Term Knowledge Retention and Transfer Application Testing：Knowledge retention rate
Tijdsspanne: at 1 month and 3 months post-teaching
Knowledge retention rate: A closed-book test consisting of 20 standardized multiple-choice questions (1 point each, total 20 points), parallel in content to the teaching cases but with different scenarios, was administered at one month post-teaching. The retention rate was calculated as (actual score / maximum score × 100%).
at 1 month and 3 months post-teaching
Mid- to Long-Term Knowledge Retention and Transfer Application Testing：Transfer application ability
Tijdsspanne: at 1 month and 3 months post-teaching
Transfer application ability at three months: A new virtual case not presented during teaching was introduced. Participants were required to complete four tasks: selection of monitoring indicators, design of anesthesia and analgesia regimens, planning of adverse event countermeasures, and justification for regimen adjustments (each task scored 0-25, total 100 points). Two senior clinicians blinded to group allocation independently rated the performance, and the average score was taken as the transfer application score.
at 1 month and 3 months post-teaching
Subjective Learning Experience and Cognitive Load
Tijdsspanne: immediately post-teaching
The Paas Self-Rating Scale of Cognitive Load were used to measure participants' mental load, mental demand, and effort immediately after key teaching sessions.
immediately post-teaching

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

China International Neuroscience Institution

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Geschat)

25 juli 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

19 oktober 2026

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

22 oktober 2026

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

15 juli 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

27 juli 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

30 juli 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

30 juli 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

27 juli 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 juli 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • CINI -ZYLX-2026[0622]

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren