Insecticide-Treated Baby Wraps for the Prevention of Malaria
14 augustus 2026 bijgewerkt door: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Factory-Treated, Long-Lasting Insecticide-Treated Baby Wraps for the Prevention of Malaria: A Phase III Clinical Trial
The objective is to test the protective effect of permethrin-treated and etofenprox-treated lesus against malaria in young children
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Nog niet aan het werven
Interventie / Behandeling
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
The proposed study is a double-blind, randomized control trial of permethrin-treated and etofenprox-treated lesus to prevent P. falciparum malaria in children 2-4 months of age conducted at three sites in rural Uganda.
Participating mother-infant pairs will receive a new bed net and two permethrin-treated or untreated lesus at enrollment.
The total sample size will be 1,296 mother-infant pairs with 144 pairs in each group.
The investigators will follow participants longitudinally for three years.
Participants will be instructed and incentivized to present to one of the study clinics when a fever develops, where they will be evaluated, tested, and treated, if positive, for malaria.
Participants will also attend scheduled clinic visits every two months for routine surveillance of adverse effects and to test for asymptomatic infection.
Re-treatment and sham re-treatment of lesus will occur after 1 year of participation.
Participants will be asked to return the lesus after 2 years of participation.
Studietype
Ingrijpend
Inschrijving (Geschat)
1296
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.
Studiecontact
- Naam: Ross Boyce, MD, MSc
- Telefoonnummer: 919-966-2537
- E-mail: ross_boyce@med.unc.edu
Studie Locaties
-
-
-
Mbarara, Oeganda
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology
-
Contact:
- Edgar Mulogo, PhD, MPH
- Telefoonnummer: 256-48540-20332
-
Hoofdonderzoeker:
- Edgar Mulogo, PhD, MPH
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
- Kind
- Volwassen
- Oudere volwassene
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Ja
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Mother is at least 18 years old
- Mother has access to a working phone with a known number
- Mother is the parent or legal guardian of a singleton (i.e., not a twin) infant 2-4 months of age
- Has the ability to travel to a designated study site for visits and evaluation
- Mother/Infant pair presents to their 10-week immunization visit at one of the designated study sites
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participation in another study of malaria prevention
- Known allergic reaction to permethrin or etofenprox
- Infant has a known HIV diagnosis (or exposure) or sickle cell disease that would be an indication for malaria prophylaxis
Studie plan
Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Preventie
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Dubbele
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Experimenteel: Receives permethrin-treated lesu
Receives permethrin-treated lesu for 2 years
|
Patterned cotton-blend fabric will be obtained and treated with permethrin at Perimeter Insect Guard.
After treatment, the material will be cut into 2 x 1 meter swathes
|
|
Experimenteel: Receives etofenprox-treated lesu
Receives etofenprox-treated lesu for 2 years
|
Patterned cotton-blend fabric will be obtained and treated with etofenprox at Perimeter Insect Guard.
After treatment, the material will be cut into 2 x 1 meter swathes
|
|
Sham-vergelijker: Receives non-treated lesu
Receives the non-treated lesu for 2 years
|
Untreated fabric of identical appearance (i.e., color and pattern) will be similarly cut and packaged for use
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of clinical malaria in children between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Incidence of participants experiencing acute febrile illness AND positive malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) at a scheduled or unscheduled study visit.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Incidence of clinical malaria in children between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Incidence of participants experiencing acute febrile illness AND positive malaria RDT at a scheduled or unscheduled study visit.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of clinical malaria in children between the permethrin and control arms per site
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Incidence of participants experiencing acute febrile illness AND positive malaria RDT at a scheduled or unscheduled study visit.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Incidence of clinical malaria in children between the etofenprox and control arms per site
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Incidence of participants experiencing acute febrile illness AND positive malaria RDT at a scheduled or unscheduled study visit.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Incidence of hospitalizations due to malaria between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment to Month 36
|
Incidence of admissions from clinic after a positive malaria RDT.
|
From enrollment to Month 36
|
|
Incidence of hospitalizations due to malaria between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment to Month 36
|
Incidence of admissions from clinic after a positive malaria RDT.
|
From enrollment to Month 36
|
|
Number of deaths from any cause between the permethrin and control arms during wrap use
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment to Month 24
|
Number of deaths documented, regardless of cause.
|
From enrollment to Month 24
|
|
Number of deaths from any cause between the etofenprox and control arms during wrap use
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment to Month 24
|
Number of deaths documented, regardless of cause.
|
From enrollment to Month 24
|
|
Number of deaths from any cause between the permethrin and control arms after wrap use has been discontinued
Tijdsspanne: From Month 24 to Month 36
|
Number of deaths documented, regardless of cause.
|
From Month 24 to Month 36
|
|
Number of deaths from any cause between the etofenprox and control arms after wrap use has been discontinued
Tijdsspanne: From Month 24 to Month 36
|
Number of deaths documented, regardless of cause.
|
From Month 24 to Month 36
|
|
Number of deaths from malaria between the permethrin and control arms during wrap use
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment to Month 24
|
Number of deaths documented during hospitalization.
|
From enrollment to Month 24
|
|
Number of deaths from malaria between the etofenprox and control arms during wrap use
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment to Month 24
|
Number of deaths documented during hospitalization.
|
From enrollment to Month 24
|
|
Number of deaths from malaria between the permethrin and control arms after wrap use has been discontinued
Tijdsspanne: From Month 24 to Month 36
|
Number of deaths documented during hospitalization.
|
From Month 24 to Month 36
|
|
Number of deaths from malaria between the etofenprox and control arms after wrap use has been discontinued
Tijdsspanne: From Month 24 to Month 36
|
Number of deaths documented during hospitalization.
|
From Month 24 to Month 36
|
|
Difference between the permethrin and control arms in change from baseline of childrens' hemoglobin levels
Tijdsspanne: At baseline, 12 Months, and 24 Months
|
Hemoglobin measured using a Hemocue device.
|
At baseline, 12 Months, and 24 Months
|
|
Difference between the etofenprox and control arms in change from baseline of childrens' hemoglobin levels
Tijdsspanne: At baseline, 12 Months, and 24 Months
|
Hemoglobin measured using a Hemocue device.
|
At baseline, 12 Months, and 24 Months
|
|
Incidence of non-malarial febrile episodes in children between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Incidence of participants experiencing acute febrile illness and negative malaria RDT at a scheduled or unscheduled study visit.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Incidence of non-malarial febrile episodes in children between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Incidence of participants experiencing acute febrile illness and negative malaria RDT at a scheduled or unscheduled study visit.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Wrap attrition
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
The number of wraps lost or damaged and requiring replacement.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Incidence of rebound clinical malaria in children between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From Month 24 through Month 36
|
Incidence of participants experiencing acute febrile illness AND positive malaria RDT at a scheduled or unscheduled study visit after wrap discontinuation.
|
From Month 24 through Month 36
|
|
Incidence of rebound clinical malaria in children between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From Month 24 through Month 36
|
Incidence of participants experiencing acute febrile illness AND positive malaria RDT at a scheduled or unscheduled study visit after wrap discontinuation.
|
From Month 24 through Month 36
|
|
Number of adverse reactions to wraps between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Counts of the top 5 most common adverse reactions reported by participants on questionnaires and assessed by clinic staff.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Number of adverse reactions to wraps between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Counts of the top 5 most common adverse reactions reported by participants on questionnaires and assessed by clinic staff.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Number of participants with care-seeking events attributable to the permethrin wrap versus the control
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Number of participants with care-seeking events attributable to the permethrin wrap versus the control wrap.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Number of participants with care-seeking events attributable to the etofenprox wrap versus the control
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Number of participants with care-seeking events attributable to the etofenprox wrap versus the control wrap.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Number of participants with hospitalizations attributable to the permethrin wrap versus the control
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Number of participants with hospitalizations attributable to the permethrin wrap versus the control wrap.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Number of participants with hospitalizations attributable to the etofenprox wrap versus the control
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Number of participants with hospitalizations attributable to the etofenprox wrap versus the control wrap.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Number of participants with death attributable to the permethrin wrap versus the control
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Number of participants with death attributable to the permethrin wrap versus the control wrap.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Number of participants with death attributable to the etofenprox wrap versus the control
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Number of participants with death attributable to the etofenprox wrap versus the control wrap.
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's height-for-weight between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Change in Z-score for height-for-weight. A height-for-weight Z-score indicates how a child's height compares with a reference population of children of the same weight. A score of 0 represents the reference average; positive values indicate above-average height-for-weight, and negative values indicate below-average height-for-weight. Z = 0: Average height-for-weight in the reference population Z = +1: One standard deviation above the reference average Z = -1: One standard deviation below the reference average Z = -2: Substantially below the reference average |
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's height-for-weight between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Change in Z-score for height-for-weight. A height-for-weight Z-score indicates how a child's height compares with a reference population of children of the same weight. A score of 0 represents the reference average; positive values indicate above-average height-for-weight, and negative values indicate below-average height-for-weight. Z = 0: Average weight-for-age in the reference population Z = +1: One standard deviation above the reference average Z = -1: One standard deviation below the reference average Z = -2: Substantially below the reference average |
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's height-for-age between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Change in Z-score for height-for-age. A height-for-age Z-score indicates how a child's height compares with a reference population of children of the same age. A score of 0 represents the reference average; positive values indicate above-average height-for-age, and negative values indicate below-average height-for-age. Z = 0: Average height-for-age in the reference population Z = +1: One standard deviation above the reference average Z = -1: One standard deviation below the reference average Z = -2: Substantially below the reference average |
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's height-for-age between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Change in Z-score for height-for-age. Change in Z-score for height-for-age. A height-for-age Z-score indicates how a child's height compares with a reference population of children of the same age. A score of 0 represents the reference average; positive values indicate above-average height-for-age, and negative values indicate below-average height-for-age. Z = 0: Average height-for-age in the reference population Z = +1: One standard deviation above the reference average Z = -1: One standard deviation below the reference average Z = -2: Substantially below the reference average |
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's weight-for-age between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Change in Z-score for weight-for-age. Change in Z-score for weight-for-age. A weight-for-age Z-score indicates how a child's weight compares with a reference population of children of the same age. A score of 0 represents the reference average; positive values indicate above-average weight-for-age, and negative values indicate below-average weight-for-age. Z = 0: Average weight-for-age in the reference population Z = +1: One standard deviation above the reference average Z = -1: One standard deviation below the reference average Z = -2: Substantially below the reference average |
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's weight-for-age between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Change in Z-score for weight-for-age. Change in Z-score for weight-for-age. Change in Z-score for weight-for-age. A weight-for-age Z-score indicates how a child's weight compares with a reference population of children of the same age. A score of 0 represents the reference average; positive values indicate above-average weight-for-age, and negative values indicate below-average weight-for-age. Z = 0: Average weight-for-age in the reference population Z = +1: One standard deviation above the reference average Z = -1: One standard deviation below the reference average Z = -2: Substantially below the reference average |
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's acute malnutrition between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Change in Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC).
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's acute malnutrition between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: From enrollment through Month 24
|
Change in Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC).
|
From enrollment through Month 24
|
|
Change in child's score on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Change in median composite scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning.
The Early Learning Composite from the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) will be used to measure developmental functioning.
The Early Learning Composite (ELC) is a standardized composite score derived from the 5 subtests measured on the MSEL.
It has a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
Higher scores indicate stronger performance.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's score on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Change in mean composite scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning.
The Early Learning Composite from the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) will be used to measure developmental functioning.
The Early Learning Composite (ELC) is a standardized composite score derived from the 5 subtests measured on the MSEL.
It has a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
Higher scores indicate stronger performance.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Physical Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Physical subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which includes items measuring gross- and fine-motor skills, coordination, strength, stamina, and flexibility.
Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Adaptive Behavior Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Adaptive Behavior subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which includes items measuring age-appropriate independent functioning.
Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Social-Emotional Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Social-Emotional subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which includes items measuring skills related to interpersonal behavior and demonstration of social and emotional competence.
Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Cognitive Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Cognitive subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which includes items measuring perception, concept development, number relations, reasoning, memory, classification, time concepts, and related mental acuity tasks.
Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Communication Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Communication subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which reflects the ability to understand spoken and written language as well as to use both verbal and nonverbal skills to communicate.
Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Physical Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Physical subscale of the Developmental Profile 4. Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Adaptive Behavior Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Adaptive Behavior subscale of the Developmental Profile 4. Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Social-Emotional Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Social-Emotional subscale of the Developmental Profile 4. Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Cognitive Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Cognitive subscale of the Developmental Profile 4. Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's percentile on the Developmental Profile 4: Communication Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Communication subscale of the Developmental Profile 4. Expressed as a percentile from 0 to 100%, where a score of 50% indicates that the child performs equal to their same age peers, a score above 50% indicates they perform better than their same age peers, and a score below 50% indicates they perform worse than their same age peers.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Physical Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Physical subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Physical Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Physical subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Adaptive Behavior Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Adaptive Behavior subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Adaptive Behavior Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Adaptive Behavior subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Social-Emotional Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Social-Emotional subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Social-Emotional Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Social-Emotional subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Cognitive Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Cognitive subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Cognitive Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Cognitive subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Communication Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Communication subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's growth score on the Developmental Profile 4: Communication Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Communication subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which is expressed as a a raw score from 40 to 160 that is designed specifically to track progress and monitor developmental change over time, where higher scores indicate better performance
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Physical Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Physical subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Physical Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Physical subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Adaptive Behavior Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Adaptive Behavior subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Adaptive Behavior Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Adaptive Behavior subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Social-Emotional Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Social-Emotional subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Social-Emotional Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Social-Emotional subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Cognitive Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Cognitive subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Cognitive Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Cognitive subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Communication Scale between the permethrin and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Communication subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
|
Change in child's age equivalent on the Developmental Profile 4: Communication Scale between the etofenprox and control arms
Tijdsspanne: Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Performance on the Communication subscale of the Developmental Profile 4, which translates the child's performance to the age at which an average child achieves those same raw scores.
Expressed as a metric in the format X:Y where X equals the number of years old, and Y equals a number between 0 and 11.
Values higher than the child's age-equivalence reflects developmental functioning consistent with that of older children.
|
Enrollment, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Ross Boyce, MD, MSc, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Studie record data
Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Geschat)
1 januari 2027
Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)
1 januari 2030
Studie voltooiing (Geschat)
1 januari 2031
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
14 augustus 2026
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
14 augustus 2026
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
19 augustus 2026
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
19 augustus 2026
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
14 augustus 2026
Laatst geverifieerd
1 augustus 2026
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Trefwoorden
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- 26-1754
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
JA
Beschrijving IPD-plan
Deidentified individual data that supports the results may be shared beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
IPD-tijdsbestek voor delen
beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
IPD-toegangscriteria voor delen
Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Nee
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Nee
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .