DeepMedFake-Assisted Detection of Synthetic and Discordant Medical Images
12 september 2026 bijgewerkt door: Lv, Han, Beijing Friendship Hospital
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance and Multi-Setting Application of an AI-Based Medical Image Verification System
This prospective randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether DeepMedFake improves the identification of medical images that require further verification.
DeepMedFake is an artificial intelligence-based medical image analysis system that provides an image-authenticity risk assessment, a patient-image consistency risk assessment and a recommendation regarding further verification.
Hospital physicians and healthcare audit professionals will participate in a randomized two-period crossover design.
Each participant will assess one case set with DeepMedFake assistance and the other without AI assistance.
The primary outcome in each cohort is the sensitivity of the final verification decision, evaluated separately in the hospital clinical and healthcare audit cohorts.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Nog niet aan het werven
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Studietype
Ingrijpend
Inschrijving (Geschat)
64
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.
Studiecontact
- Naam: Han Lv
- Telefoonnummer: +8613901073227
- E-mail: chrislvhan@126.com
Studie Locaties
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100050
- Beijing Friendship hospital, Capital Medical University
-
Contact:
- Han Lv, Professor
- Telefoonnummer: +8613901073227
- E-mail: chrislvhan@126.com
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
- Volwassen
- Oudere volwassene
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Ja
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Able to complete reading periods and all required electronic study procedures.
- Completed the standardized study training and practice cases.
Provided written informed consent before participation.
（1）Hospital clinical cohort participants must also meet the following criteria:
- Hold a valid physician qualification.
- Currently practice in ophthalmology, radiology, ultrasound medicine, or a clinical specialty in which imaging of the neurological or cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, thoracic, abdominal, or musculoskeletal domain is routinely reviewed.
- Have direct professional experience reviewing all imaging modalities and clinical imaging domains assigned to them in the study.
Routinely use the assigned medical images for image interpretation, image verification or clinical decision-making.
（2）Healthcare audit cohort participants must also meet the following criteria:
- Currently work in healthcare audit, medical reimbursement review, medical-cost review or medical-material verification.
- Have experience reviewing medical imaging materials as part of their routine work.
- Have knowledge required to interpret the medical images and patient information presented in the study and to determine whether further verification is required.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Direct involvement in development of the locked DeepMedFake model, determination of model weights or selection of decision thresholds.
- Direct involvement in selection or construction of the formal case library or adjudication of the reference standard.
- Direct involvement in generation or implementation of the reader randomization sequence.
- Previous participation as a reader in the pilot study.
- Previous access to any formal study case, case-construction record or reference-standard label.
- Access to undisclosed study information that could permit advance identification of case type or image-generation method.
- A financial, professional or other conflict of interest considered likely to compromise independent case assessment.
Studie plan
Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Ander
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Crossover-opdracht
- Masker: Enkel
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Experimenteel: Crossover Sequence A
Participants undergo unassisted review of case set S1 during Period 1, followed by DeepMedFake-assisted review of case set S2 during Period 2.
|
DeepMedFake is an artificial intelligence-based medical image analysis system designed to support the detection of synthetic medical images and authentic medical images paired with discordant patient information.
It provides an image-authenticity risk assessment, a patient-image consistency risk assessment and a recommendation regarding further verification.
In this study, DeepMedFake is used as a decision-support tool to assist participants in determining whether the image requires further verification before downstream clinical or healthcare audit use.
Final judgments and verification decisions are made by the participants.
|
|
Experimenteel: Crossover Sequence B
Participants undergo DeepMedFake-assisted review of case set S1 during Period 1, followed by unassisted review of case set S2 during Period 2.
|
DeepMedFake is an artificial intelligence-based medical image analysis system designed to support the detection of synthetic medical images and authentic medical images paired with discordant patient information.
It provides an image-authenticity risk assessment, a patient-image consistency risk assessment and a recommendation regarding further verification.
In this study, DeepMedFake is used as a decision-support tool to assist participants in determining whether the image requires further verification before downstream clinical or healthcare audit use.
Final judgments and verification decisions are made by the participants.
|
|
Experimenteel: Crossover Sequence C
Participants undergo unassisted review of case set S2 during Period 1, followed by DeepMedFake-assisted review of case set S1 during Period 2.
|
DeepMedFake is an artificial intelligence-based medical image analysis system designed to support the detection of synthetic medical images and authentic medical images paired with discordant patient information.
It provides an image-authenticity risk assessment, a patient-image consistency risk assessment and a recommendation regarding further verification.
In this study, DeepMedFake is used as a decision-support tool to assist participants in determining whether the image requires further verification before downstream clinical or healthcare audit use.
Final judgments and verification decisions are made by the participants.
|
|
Experimenteel: Crossover Sequence D
Participants undergo DeepMedFake-assisted review of case set S2 during Period 1, followed by unassisted review of case set S1 during Period 2.
|
DeepMedFake is an artificial intelligence-based medical image analysis system designed to support the detection of synthetic medical images and authentic medical images paired with discordant patient information.
It provides an image-authenticity risk assessment, a patient-image consistency risk assessment and a recommendation regarding further verification.
In this study, DeepMedFake is used as a decision-support tool to assist participants in determining whether the image requires further verification before downstream clinical or healthcare audit use.
Final judgments and verification decisions are made by the participants.
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Reader Performance With and Without DeepMedFake Assistance: Sensitivity of the Final Verification Decision in the Hospital Clinical Cohort
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
The percentage of reference-standard abnormal cases assigned to further verification by hospital physicians will be estimated under DeepMedFake-assisted and unassisted review.
The effect measure is the absolute percentage-point difference between review conditions.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Reader Performance With and Without DeepMedFake Assistance: Sensitivity of the Final Verification Decision in the Healthcare Audit Cohort
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
The percentage of reference-standard abnormal cases assigned to further verification by healthcare audit professionals will be estimated under DeepMedFake-assisted and unassisted review.
The effect measure is the absolute percentage-point difference between review conditions.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Reader Performance With and Without DeepMedFake Assistance: Specificity of the Final Verification Decision in the Hospital Clinical Cohort
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
The percentage of authentic, information-matched cases assigned to no further verification by hospital physicians will be estimated under each review condition and compared between conditions.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Reader Performance With and Without DeepMedFake Assistance: Specificity of the Final Verification Decision in the Healthcare Audit Cohort
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
The percentage of authentic, information-matched cases assigned to no further verification by healthcare audit professionals will be estimated under each review condition and compared between conditions.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Sensitivity of the Final Verification Decision for Synthetic Medical Image Cases
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
The percentage of reference-standard synthetic-image cases assigned to further verification will be estimated under each review condition.
DeepMedFake-assisted and unassisted review will be compared separately within the hospital clinical and healthcare audit cohorts.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Sensitivity of the Final Verification Decision in Discordant Cases
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
The percentage of authentic images paired with discordant patient information that are assigned to further verification will be estimated under each review condition.
DeepMedFake-assisted and unassisted review will be compared separately within the hospital clinical and healthcare audit cohorts.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Sensitivity of the Image-Authenticity Judgment
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
The percentage of reference-standard synthetic-image cases classified as suspected synthetic images will be estimated under each review condition and compared separately within each reader cohort.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Specificity of the Image-Authenticity Judgment
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
The percentage of reference-standard authentic-image cases classified as not suspected to be synthetic will be estimated under each review condition and compared separately within each reader cohort.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Sensitivity of the Patient-Image Consistency Judgment
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
Among authentic images, the percentage of discordant cases classified as discordant with the displayed patient information will be estimated under each review condition and compared separately within each reader cohort.
Synthetic-image cases will be excluded from this analysis.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Specificity of the Patient-Image Consistency Judgment
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
Among authentic images, the percentage of information-matched cases classified as matching the displayed patient information will be estimated under each review condition and compared separately within each reader cohort.
Synthetic-image cases will be excluded from this analysis.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
|
Case-Level Workflow Time
Tijdsspanne: During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
Elapsed time in seconds from successful case loading to submission of the final required case-level response, including selection of a proposed first verification pathway when required.
Recorded pauses will be excluded.
Workflow time will be compared between review conditions separately within each reader cohort.
|
During both reading periods, up to 4 weeks after randomization
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.
Sponsor
Studie record data
Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Geschat)
20 september 2026
Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)
20 oktober 2026
Studie voltooiing (Geschat)
31 oktober 2026
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
12 september 2026
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
12 september 2026
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
16 september 2026
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
16 september 2026
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
12 september 2026
Laatst geverifieerd
1 september 2026
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Trefwoorden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- 2026-P2-308-01
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
NEE
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Nee
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Nee
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .