Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Effectiveness of an Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Health Education Program (APN-HEALTH) (APN-HEALTH)

Effectiveness of an Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Health Education Program (Efectividad de un Programa de educación en Salud Desarrollado Por la Enfermera de Práctica Avanzada)

Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) has demonstrated a positive impact on improving health outcomes in various international clinical settings. In Spain, however, its integration is still limited and variable, especially in specialized fields such as neurology and surgery. Existing evidence suggests that health education led by an APN can improve key indicators such as health literacy, self-efficacy, and patient satisfaction, although further research is needed in our context.

Hypothesis: Health education provided by an APN significantly improves health literacy, self-efficacy, quality of life, and the healthcare experience of patients seen in neurology and surgery nursing clinics.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of health education provided by an APN on health literacy, self-efficacy, quality of life, and the experience of patients seen in a neurology and surgery nursing clinic.

Methods: A quasi-experimental, pre- and post-intervention, single-group study. The study will begin after approval by the relevant Ethics Committee. The intervention will consist of providing comprehensive, individualized health education that includes information on the person's health history, recommended lifestyle habits and practices, available treatment options, identification of warning signs and symptoms, how to respond appropriately to them, available care pathways, and contact information for the unit. Patients seen by a Primary Care Team (PCT) in neurology and surgery nursing consultations will be included, with data collected at three points in care: before the intervention, after the intervention, and at 6 months. The primary variable is health literacy, and secondary variables are self-efficacy, quality of life, and patient experience. A pre-post comparability analysis will be performed on the variables studied.

Relevance: The results will provide applicable evidence to promote organizational models that integrate PCTs into specialized care, improving the quality of care and the patient experience, and guiding future lines of research and implementation policies. In turn, they intend to demonstrate the value provided by the EPAs on the outcome indicators and the experience of the people attended in the neurology and surgery nursing consultations.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Nog niet aan het werven

Conditie

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Geschat)

50

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Patients referred for their first individualized health education visit at the Advanced Practice Nursing clinics in the Department of Neurosciences and Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment preventing active participation in or understanding of the educational intervention and assessment questionnaires.
  • Language barriers that prevent adequate understanding of the intervention or completion of the questionnaires.
  • Failure to complete the pre- and post-intervention assessments

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: NVT
  • Interventioneel model: Opdracht voor een enkele groep
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Advanced Practice Nursing Model

The intervention will consist of providing comprehensive, individualized health education tailored to each specific health situation and condition. This health education will take place during routine healthcare visits and will include: information about the person's health status, recommended lifestyle habits and practices, available treatment options, identification of warning signs and symptoms and how to respond appropriately, available healthcare pathways, and contact information for the unit. The health education will be supplemented with printed materials to facilitate understanding and self-care at home. The duration of these visits varies depending on the individual's health condition and situation, typically ranging from 30 to 60 minutes.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Health literacy
Tijdsspanne: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Health literacy will be assessed using the 12-item Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-Q12). Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 4 (very easy). The total score ranges from 12 to 48, with higher scores indicating better health literacy.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Self-efficacy for managing chronic disease
Tijdsspanne: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Self-efficacy will be assessed using the 4-item Spanish version of the Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale (SEMCD-S). Each item is scored from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). The overall score is calculated as the mean of the four items and ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy in managing chronic disease.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.
Health-related quality of life
Tijdsspanne: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-12v2). The questionnaire provides two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Scores will be calculated using norm-based scoring based on the 2009 US general population norms (mean 50, standard deviation 10). The theoretical score ranges are 9.9 to 76.0 for PCS and 3.2 to 77.9 for MCS, assuming complete data. Higher scores indicate better physical and mental health-related quality of life, respectively.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.
Patient experience
Tijdsspanne: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Patient experience will be assessed using the Instrument for Evaluation of the Experience of Chronic Patients (IEXPAC). The questionnaire includes 11 core items scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with responses converted to values ranging from 0 to 10. The overall score is calculated as the mean of the 11 core items and ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better patient experience. Additional conditional items are scored separately and are not included in the overall score.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Geschat)

1 februari 2027

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

1 februari 2028

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

1 februari 2028

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

13 juli 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

14 oktober 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

19 oktober 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

13 november 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

12 november 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 november 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • PR(AG)295/2025

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren