- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT01634269
Clinical Evaluation of MDT-2111 in Subjects With Small Aortic Annuli and Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Medtronic MDT-2111 CoreValve Japan 23mm Study
Studieoversikt
Detaljert beskrivelse
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
Kanagawa
-
Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital
-
-
Osaka
-
Suita, Osaka, Japan
- Osaka University Hospital
-
Suita, Osaka, Japan
- National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
-
-
Saitama
-
Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
- Saitama Medical University
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Barn
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject must have co-morbidities such that one cardiologist and one cardiac surgeon agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement.
Subject has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with:
mean gradient > 40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s by either resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram, or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization (either resting or dobutamine stress), AND an initial aortic valve area of ≤ 0.8 cm² (or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.5 cm²/m²) by resting echocardiogram.
- Subject is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class Class III or greater. If screening committee agrees the eligibility of a patient with class II , based on medical factors, he/she can be enrolled.
- Patient has been informed of the nature of the trial and has signed an Informed Consent Form.
- Patient agrees to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and to return to the same investigational site where the procedure was performed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 30 days prior to the intended treatment.
- Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to the procedure.
Blood dyscrasias as defined:
- Leukopenia (WBC count < 1,000 cells/mm³)
- Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000 cells/mm³)
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- Hypercoagulable states
- Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
- Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support.
- Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
- Severe ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20% as measured by resting echocardiogram.
- Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack(TIA).
- End stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
- GI bleeding within the past 3 months.
A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following which cannot be adequately pre-medicated:
- Aspirin
- Ticlopidine
- Heparin
- Contrast media
- Nitinol (titanium and nickel alloy)
- Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis.
- Subject refuses a blood transfusion.
- Life expectancy < 12 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions.
- Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of an Investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent.
- Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits).
- Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device trial. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials.
- Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease.
- Native aortic annulus size < 18 mm or > 20 mm per the screening diagnostic imaging.
- Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position.
- Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation).
- Mitral regurgitation (moderate to severe) or severe tricuspid regurgitation.
- Moderate to severe mitral stenosis.
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Severe basal septal hypertrophy with an outflow gradient.
- Ascending aorta diameter > 34 mm
- Congenital bicuspid or unicuspid valve verified by echocardiography.
For patients with native coronary artery dependent circulation:
- Sinus of valsalva width < 25 mm OR
- Height of the left or right coronary sinus of valsalva (to the tubular aorta) < 15mm.
Femoral or iliac artery of the first choice corresponding to any one of the following:
- Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70°.
- Vessel diameter of femoral or iliac artery is less than 6 mm.
- Aorta has severe calcification, excess tortuosity or severe atherosclerosis.
- Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
Subclavian artery of the second choice corresponding to any one of the following:
- Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70° (in the case of left subclavian artery) and 30° (in the case of right subclavian artery).
- Vessel diameter of subclavian artery is less than 6 mm.
- Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
Direct Aortic Artery as third line choice of access. Patients are excluded from Direct Aortic access if:
- Access site is less than 6 cm from the aortic valve basal plane
- Access site has calcification or porcelain aorta
- Access site and delivery trajectory contain RIMA or patent RIMA graft
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: N/A
- Intervensjonsmodell: Enkeltgruppeoppdrag
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: MDT-2111 TAVI 23 mm
Subjects with small annuli and symptomatic severe AS deemed difficult for surgical intervention.
|
Device: 23 mm MDT-2111 System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using the 23 mm MDT-2111 system.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Score of Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and Effective Orifice Area (EOA).
Tidsramme: baseline and 6 months
|
The primary endpoint is a composite of functional effectiveness as measured by improvement of at least 1 NYHA class from baseline to 6 months and anatomical effectiveness as measured by Effective Orifice Area (EOA) ≥1.0 cm² at 6 months.
|
baseline and 6 months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
Tidsramme: 30 days
|
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
30 days
|
|
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
Tidsramme: 6 months
|
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
6 months
|
|
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
Tidsramme: 12 months
|
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
12 months
|
|
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
Tidsramme: 24 months
|
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
24 months
|
|
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)
Tidsramme: 0 dager til 30 dager
|
MACCE er definert som en sammensetning av:
|
0 dager til 30 dager
|
|
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)
Tidsramme: 0 dag til 6 måneder
|
MACCE er definert som en sammensetning av:
|
0 dag til 6 måneder
|
|
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)
Tidsramme: 0 dag til 12 måneder
|
MACCE er definert som en sammensetning av:
|
0 dag til 12 måneder
|
|
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)
Tidsramme: 0 dag til 24 måneder
|
MACCE er definert som en sammensetning av:
|
0 dag til 24 måneder
|
|
Device Success as Defined in the Description.
Tidsramme: after procedure or discharge
|
The following components must be satisfied for device success:
|
after procedure or discharge
|
|
Procedural Success, Defined as Device Success and Absence of In-hospital MACCE
Tidsramme: from admission for procedure to discharge
|
Procedural success is defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACCE.
|
from admission for procedure to discharge
|
|
Ekkokardiografisk vurdering av proteseventilytelse - gjennomsnittlig gradient
Tidsramme: 30 dager
|
30 dager
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient
Tidsramme: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
Ekkokardiografisk vurdering av proteseventilytelse - gjennomsnittlig gradient
Tidsramme: 12 måneder
|
12 måneder
|
|
|
Ekkokardiografisk vurdering av proteseventilytelse - gjennomsnittlig gradient
Tidsramme: 24 måneder
|
24 måneder
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Tidsramme: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Tidsramme: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Tidsramme: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Tidsramme: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
|
Ekkokardiografisk vurdering av proteseklaffytelse - venstre ventrikulær ejeksjonsfraksjon (LVEF)
Tidsramme: 30 dager
|
30 dager
|
|
|
Ekkokardiografisk vurdering av proteseklaffytelse - venstre ventrikulær ejeksjonsfraksjon (LVEF)
Tidsramme: 6 måneder
|
6 måneder
|
|
|
Ekkokardiografisk vurdering av proteseklaffytelse - venstre ventrikulær ejeksjonsfraksjon (LVEF)
Tidsramme: 12 måneder
|
12 måneder
|
|
|
Ekkokardiografisk vurdering av proteseklaffytelse - venstre ventrikulær ejeksjonsfraksjon (LVEF)
Tidsramme: 24 måneder
|
24 måneder
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
Tidsramme: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
Tidsramme: 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
Tidsramme: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
|
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
Tidsramme: 24 months
|
24 months
|
|
|
Gjenta sykehusinnleggelse
Tidsramme: 0 dager til 30 dager
|
0 dager til 30 dager
|
|
|
Gjenta sykehusinnleggelse
Tidsramme: 0 dag til 6 måneder
|
0 dag til 6 måneder
|
|
|
Gjenta sykehusinnleggelse
Tidsramme: 0 dag til 12 måneder
|
0 dag til 12 måneder
|
|
|
Gjenta sykehusinnleggelse
Tidsramme: 0 dag til 24 måneder
|
0 dag til 24 måneder
|
|
|
Ventilrelaterte dødsfall
Tidsramme: 0 dager til 30 dager
|
0 dager til 30 dager
|
|
|
Ventilrelaterte dødsfall
Tidsramme: 0 dag til 6 måneder
|
0 dag til 6 måneder
|
|
|
Valve-related Deaths
Tidsramme: 0 day to 12 months
|
0 day to 12 months
|
|
|
Ventilrelaterte dødsfall
Tidsramme: 0 dag til 24 måneder
|
0 dag til 24 måneder
|
|
|
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
Tidsramme: Baseline to 30 days
|
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status.
The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population.
The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score.
Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score.
A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
|
Baseline to 30 days
|
|
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
Tidsramme: Baseline to 6 months
|
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status.
The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population.
The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score.
Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score.
A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
Tidsramme: Baseline to 12 months
|
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status.
The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population.
The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score.
Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score.
A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
|
Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
Tidsramme: Baseline to 24 months
|
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status.
The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population.
The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score.
Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score.
A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
|
Baseline to 24 months
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Yoshi Sawa, Professor, Osaka University Hospital
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Anslag)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- MDT-2111 23 mm trial
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .